Physical Activity Measurement Among Individuals With Disabilities: A Literature Review

in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly
View More View Less
  • 1 Texas State University
  • 2 The Ohio State University
Restricted access

Purchase Article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $64.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $86.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $122.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $162.00

This review examined the literature on physical activity measurement among individuals with disabilities utilizing Yun and Ulrich’s (2002) view on measurement validity. Specific inclusion criteria were identified. The search produced 115 articles; however, only 28 met all specified criteria. Findings revealed that self-reports and accelerometers were the most common approaches to measuring physical activity, and individuals with orthopedic impairments, those with mental retardation, and those with other health impairments received the most attention. Of the 28 articles, 17 (61%) reported validity and reliability evidence. Among those studies reporting validity, criterion-related evidence was the most common; however, a number of methodological limitations relative to validity were observed. Given the importance of using multiple physical activity measures, only five (18%) studies reported the use of multiple measures. Findings are discussed relative to conducting future physical activity research on persons with disabilities.

Carlos M. Cervantes is with the Department of Health and Human Performance at Texas State University-San Marcos. David L. Porretta is with the School of Physical Education at The Ohio State University in Columbus.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 781 548 152
Full Text Views 21 11 0
PDF Downloads 34 21 0