Say What You Mean: Rethinking Disability Language in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

Click name to view affiliation

Danielle PeersUniversity of Alberta

Search for other papers by Danielle Peers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nancy Spencer-CavaliereUniversity of Alberta

Search for other papers by Nancy Spencer-Cavaliere in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Lindsay EalesUniversity of Alberta

Search for other papers by Lindsay Eales in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly (APAQ) currently mandates that authors use person-first language in their publications. In this viewpoint article, we argue that although this policy is well intentioned, it betrays a very particular cultural and disciplinary approach to disability: one that is inappropriate given the international and multidisciplinary mandate of the journal. Further, we contend that APAQ’s current language policy may serve to delimit the range of high-quality articles submitted and to encourage both theoretical inconsistency and the erasure of the ways in which research participants self-identify. The article begins with narrative accounts of each of our negotiations with disability terminology in adapted physical activity research and practice. We then provide historical and theoretical contexts for person-first language, as well as various other widely circulated alternative English-language disability terminology. We close with four suggested revisions to APAQ’s language policy.

Danielle Peers, Nancy Spencer-Cavaliere, and Lindsay Eales are in the Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Address author correspondence to Danielle Peers at peers@ualberta.ca.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4797 1245 198
Full Text Views 1329 79 10
PDF Downloads 1602 89 11