Accuracy of the Fitbit Zip for Measuring Steps for Adolescents With Visual Impairments

in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

Click name to view affiliation

Justin A. HaegeleOld Dominion University

Search for other papers by Justin A. Haegele in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ali S. BrianUniversity of South Carolina

Search for other papers by Ali S. Brian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Donna WolfOld Dominion University

Search for other papers by Donna Wolf in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Our purpose in this study was to document the criterion validity of the Fitbit Zip for measuring steps taken by youth with visual impairments (VI). A secondary purpose was to determine whether walking pace, mounting position, or relative position to the user’s mobility device impacted the criterion validity of the device. Fourteen adolescent-aged individuals (Mage = 15.4; 13 male and 1 female) with VI participated in this study. Participants wore four Fitbit Zips at different mounting positions and completed two, 2-min walking trials while the lead investigator hand tallied steps. Measurement validity was analyzed using absolute percent error (APE), intraclass correlation coefficients estimated level of conformity, and paired samples t tests and Cohen’s d effect sizes assessed APE relative to mounting positions. Results supported the use of the Fitbit Zip during regular-paced walking; however, caution must be used during activities exceeding regular walking speeds, as devices consistently underestimated steps.

Haegele and Wolf are with the Dept. of Human Movement Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA. Brian is with the Dept. of Physical Education & Athletic Training, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.

Address author correspondence to Justin Haegele at Jhaegele@odu.edu
  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1952 568 160
Full Text Views 33 3 1
PDF Downloads 29 4 2