Missing the Mark: Gathering Better Data From Student-Athlete Exit Interviews

in Case Studies in Sport Management
View More View Less
  • 1 Ohio University
Restricted access

Purchase case

USD  $9.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $49.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $65.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $93.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $124.00

A great deal of sport management literature in recent years draws upon the need for effective quantitative and qualitative research methods. However, there are limited cases for a sport management faculty to effectively teach students proper process, design, and implementation of survey or interview research, particularly for real-world sport applications, such as student-athlete exit interviews. This case aims to fill this gap and outlines a plan for students to identify limitations in current student-athlete exit data collection methods and to learn the common barriers associated with effective research design. Students are made aware of common missteps throughout the research process and are provided foundations for effective survey and interview design. Information taught via this case can also be used across sport management contexts, such as fan experience surveys, retail customer satisfaction surveys, or donor satisfaction interviews.

The authors are with Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.

Strode (strode@ohio.edu) is corresponding author.

Supplementary Materials

    • Teaching Note (PDF 128 KB)
    • Supplementary Material (PDF 415 KB)
  • Andrew, D., Pedersen, P.M., & McEvoy, C.D. (2020). Research methods and design in sport management. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

  • Hoeber, L., & Shaw, S. (2017). Contemporary qualitative research methods in sport management. Sport Management Review, 20(1), 47. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2016.11.005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Iannotta, S.J. (2015). An analysis of current practices for NCAA Division I-FBS student-athlete exit interviews (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Retrieved from https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/parent/2n49t333b/file_sets/zc77sr46j

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Libit, D., & Cyphers, L. (2019, November 5). And the survey says… The Intercollegiate. Retrieved from https://theintercollegiate.substack.com/p/and-the-survey-says

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA]. (2020a). 2020-21 NCAA division I manual. Retrieved from http://www.ncaapublications.com/productdownloads/D121.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA]. (2020b). Student-athlete well-being. Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.org/governance/student-athlete-well-being

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pitts, B., Li, M., & Kim, A.C.H. (2018). Research methods in sport management (2nd ed.). Morgantown, WV: FIT Publishing.

  • Singer, J.N., Shaw, S., Hoeber, L., Walker, N., Agyemang, K.J.A., & Rich, K. (2019). Critical conversations about qualitative research in sport management. Journal of Sport Management, 33(1), 5063. doi:10.1123/jsm.2018-0085

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Solomon, J. (2018, April 23). The history behind the debate over paying NCAA athletes. The Aspen Institute. Retrieved from https://www.aspeninstitute.org/blog-posts/history-behind-debate-paying-ncaa-athletes/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Todd, S., Magnusen, M., Lachowetz, T., & Jones, A. (2016). Knowing your fans: A case study of survey research in a collegiate ticket office. Case Studies in Sport Management, 5(1), 9597. doi:10.1123/cssm.2015-0043

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 667 667 25
Full Text Views 77 77 2
PDF Downloads 34 34 5