Baseline Concussion Symptom Scores Vary Between Interview and Computer Self-Report Only for Male College Athletes

in International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD  $74.00

1 year subscription

USD  $99.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD  $141.00

2 year subscription

USD  $188.00

We compared two modes of ascertaining symptom information in baseline concussion testing with 754 NCAA Division II collegiate athletes. All athletes reported symptoms in both a face-to-face structured clinical interview using the SCAT3 symptom scale items and the similar symptom self-report scale in the computerized ImPACT test. Males reported significantly more symptoms and with greater severity during the interview compared to the computerized self-report. If males report symptoms according to a different format in posttrauma assessments than baseline, differences may reflect mode of testing and not change due to concussion.

Kissinger-Knox, Norheim, and Webbe are with the Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL. Vagt is with Fairchild Air Force Base, Spokane, WA. Mulligan is with the Atlantic Psychiatry Center, Palm Bay, FL.

Webbe (webbe@fit.edu) is corresponding author.
  • 1.

    Webbe FM, Zimmer A. History of neuropsychological study of sport-related concussion. Brain Inj. 2015;29(2):129138. PubMed ID: 25093375 doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.937746

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Piland SG, Ferrara MS, Macciocchi SN, Broglio SP, Gould TE. Investigation of baseline self-report concussion symptom scores. J Athl Train. 2010;45(3):273278. PubMed ID: 20446841 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-45.3.273

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Covassin T, Elbin RJ III, Stiller-Ostrowski JL, Kontos AP. Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) practices of sports medicine professionals. J Athl Train. 2009;44(6):639644. PubMed ID: 19911091 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-44.6.639

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Lovell MR, Collins MW. Neuropsychological assessment of the College Football Player. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(2):926. PubMed ID: 9575253 doi:10.1097/00001199-199804000-00004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Maroon JC, Lovell MR, Norwig J, Podell K, Powell JW, Hartl R. Cerebral concussion in athletes: evaluation and neuropsychological testing. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(3):659672. PubMed ID: 10981754

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health. 2005;27(3):281291. PubMed ID: 15870099 doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi031

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Covassin T, Swanik CB, Sachs M, et al. Sex differences in baseline neuropsychological function and concussion symptoms of collegiate athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:923927. PubMed ID: 16990442 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.029496

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Shehata N, Wiley JP, Richea S, et al. Sport concussion assessment tool: baseline values for varsity collision sport athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:730734. PubMed ID: 19460765 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.059832

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Rabinowitz AR, Merritt VC, Arnett PA. The return-to-play incentive and the effect of motivation on neuropsychological test performance implications for baseline concussion testing. Dev Neuropsychol. 2015;40(1):2933. PubMed ID: 25649777 doi:10.1080/87565641.2014.1001066

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Krol AL, Mrazik M, Naidu D, Brooks BL, Iverson GL. Assessment of symptoms in a concussion management programme: method influences outcome. Brain Inj. 2011;25(13–14):13001305. PubMed ID: 22077535 doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.624571

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Schatz P, Zillmer EA. Computer-based assessment of sports-related concussion. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10(1):4247. PubMed ID: 12734074 doi:10.1207/S15324826AN1001_6

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Alsalaheen B, Stockdale K, Pechumer D, Broglio SP. Measurement error in the Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(4):242251. PubMed ID: 26291631 doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000175

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Bruce JM, Echemendia RJ, Meeuwisse W, Hutchinson MG, Aubry M, Comper P. Measuring cognitive change with ImPACT: the aggregate baseline approach. Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;31(8):13291340. PubMed ID: 28397546 doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1311375

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Custer A, Sufrinko A, Elbin RJ, Covassin T, Collins M, Kontos A. High baseline postconcussion symptom scores and concussion outcomes in athletes. J Athl Train. 2016;51(2):136141. PubMed ID: 26885702 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.2.12

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Broshek DK, Kaushik T, Freeman JR, Erlanger D, Webbe F, Barth JT. Sex differences in outcome following sports-related concussion. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:856863. PubMed ID: 15926710 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.5.0856

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Chen J, Johnston KM, Collie A, McCrory P, Ptito A. A validation of the post-concussion symptom scale in the assessment of complex concussion using cognitive testing and functional MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:12311238. PubMed ID: 17371902 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.110395

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport- the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Clin J Sport Med. 2013;23(2):89117. PubMed ID: 23478784 doi:10.1097/JSM.0b013e31828b67cf

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MW, et al. Measurement of symptoms following sports-related concussion: reliability and normative data for the post-concussion scale. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13(3):166174. PubMed ID: 17361669 doi:10.1207/s15324826an1303_4

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Schatz P, Neidzwski K, Scolaro Moser R, Karpf R. Relationship between subjective test feedback provided by high-school athletes during computer-based assessment of baseline cognitive functioning and self-reported symptoms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25(4):285292. PubMed ID: 20363733 doi:10.1093/arclin/acq022

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Movahed MR, Martinez A, Morrell H, Greaves S, Greaves J, Sattur S. Differences according to gender in reporting physical symptoms during echocardiographic screening in healthy teenage athletes. Cardiol Young. 2008;18(3):303306. PubMed ID: 18405422 doi:10.1017/S104795110800214X

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Eiser C, Havermans T, Eiser J. The emergence during adolescence of gender differences in symptom reporting. J Adolescence. 1995;18(3):307316. doi:10.1006/jado.1995.1021

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Levine FM, DeSimone LL. The effects of experimenter gender on pain report in male and female subjects. Pain. 1991;44:6972. PubMed ID: 2038491 doi:10.1016/0304-3959(91)90149-R

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 50 50 0
Full Text Views 243 242 22
PDF Downloads 45 45 6