The Effect of the Model of Organizational Infrastructure on Collegiate Athletic Trainer Job Satisfaction: A Critically Appraised Topic

in International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training
Emily A. Hall PhD, LAT, ATC * , 1 , Dario Gonzalez MS, LAT, ATC * , 1 and Rebecca M. Lopez PhD, LAT, ATC, CSCS * , 1
View More View Less
  • 1 University of South Florida
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $76.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $101.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $144.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $192.00

Clinical Question: Does the medical model of organizational structure compared to either the academic or traditional models have a greater influence on job satisfaction and quality of life in collegiate athletic trainers? Clinical Bottom Line: Based on the quality of the person-oriented evidence available, the recommendation to adopt the medical model for athletic training staff would receive a Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) grade of B.

The authors are with Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Hall (eannehall@usf.edu) is corresponding author.
  • 1.

    Brumels K, Beach A. Professional role complexity and job satisfaction of collegiate certified athletic trainers. J Athl Train. 2008;43(4):373378. PubMed ID: 18668170 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-43.4.373

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Mazerolle SM, Eason CM, Pitney WA. Athletic trainers’ barriers to maintaining professional commitment in the collegiate setting. J Athl Train. 2015;50(5):524531. PubMed ID: 25761133 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.04

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Mazerolle SM, Goodman A, Pitney WA. Achieving work-life balance in the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I setting, part I: the role of the head athletic trainer. J Athl Train. 2015;50(1):8288. PubMed ID: 25343530 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.88

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Mazerolle SM, Eason CM. The organizational climate in collegiate athletics: an athletic trainer’s perspective. J Athl Train. 2018;53(1):8897. PubMed ID: 29251534 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-52.12.24

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Mazerolle SM, Eason CM, Goodman A. Organizational infrastructure in the collegiate athletic training setting, part I: quality-of-life comparisons and commonalities among the models. J Athl Train. 2017;52(1):1222. PubMed ID: 27874297 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.19

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Baker CS, Wilkerson GB. Comparison of Athletic Trainer Stress and Job Satisfaction with Different Models of Care Delivery. Int J Athl Ther Train. 2018;23(4):150155. doi:10.1123/ijatt.2016-0110

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Courson R, Goldenberg M, Adams KG, et al. Inter-association consensus statement on best practices for sports medicine management for secondary schools and colleges. J Athl Train. 2014;49(1):128137. PubMed ID: 24499040 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.06

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Eason CM, Mazerolle SM, Goodman A. Organizational infrastructure in the collegiate athletic training setting, part III: benefits of and barriers in the medical and academic models. J Athl Train. 2017;52(1):3544. PubMed ID: 27977302 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.25

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Goodman A, Mazerolle SM, Eason CM. Organizational infrastructure in the collegiate athletic training setting, part II: benefits of and barriers in the athletics model. J Athl Train. 2017;52(1):2334. PubMed ID: 27977301 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.24

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Kroshus E, Baugh CM, Daneshvar DH, Stamm JM, Laursen RM, Austin SB. Pressure on sports medicine clinicians to prematurely return collegiate athletes to play after concussion. J Athl Train. 2015;50(9):944951. PubMed ID: 26207440 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-50.6.03

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. IC Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada; 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(1):4753. PubMed ID: 21835406 doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Mazerolle SM, Gerhart ST, Eason CM. Exploring the effect of the medical model organizational structure on collegiate athletic trainers’ quality of life: a case study. Athl Train Sports Health Care. 2018;10(4):158168. doi:10.3928/19425864-20180201-01

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Hankemeier D, Manspeaker SA. Perceptions of interprofessional and collaborative practice in collegiate athletic trainers. J Athl Train. 2018;53(7):703708. PubMed ID: 30102070 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-308-17

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 21 21 0
Full Text Views 290 290 59
PDF Downloads 120 120 20