Fibular Glide Mobilization With Movement for the Treatment of Acute Lateral Ankle Sprains: A Critically Appraised Topic

in International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training

Click name to view affiliation

Robert J. BonserLiberty University, Lynchburg, VA, USA

Search for other papers by Robert J. Bonser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Bethany L. HansbergerTowson University, Towson, MD, USA

Search for other papers by Bethany L. Hansberger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rick A. LoutschNorthwestern College, Orange City, IA, USA

Search for other papers by Rick A. Loutsch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christy L. GendronAzusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA, USA

Search for other papers by Christy L. Gendron in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Russell T. BakerUniversity of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA

Search for other papers by Russell T. Baker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

What are the effects of the Mulligan Concept™ posterior fibular mobilization with movement (MWM) on clinical outcomes in patients who sustain an acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS)? The evidence reviewed was level C–Recommendation based on “consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, or case series for studies of diagnosis, treatment, prevention or screening.” In the studies examined, patients who received Mulligan Concept™ posterior fibular mobilizations in combination with other treatments significantly improved (Minimal Clinically Important Difference met) on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Disablement of Physically Active (DPA) scale. All patients in the studies were discharged within 2-18 days. However, due to the low level of evidence and the use of traditional conservative treatments in conjunction with mobilization, it is difficult to ascertain whether the Mulligan LAS treatment aided recovery more than traditional methods of treating acute LAS. Therefore, Mulligan Concept™ posterior fibular MWM may be useful clinically in conjunction with traditional conservative treatments for reduction of pain, disability and discharge time for patients with acute LAS, but future research must be conducted to determine if MWMs offer any benefits above and beyond traditional methods of treatment.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. J Sports Med. 2014;44(1):123140. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Herzog M, Kerr Z, Marshall E, Wikstrom E. Epidemiology of ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):603610. PubMed ID: 31135209 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-447-17

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Bielska I, Wang X, Lee R, Johnson A. The health economics of ankle and foot sprains and fractures: a systematic review of English-language published papers. Part 2: the direct and indirect costs of injury. Foot. 2019;39:115121. PubMed ID: 29174064 doi:10.1016/j.foot.2017.07.003

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    McKeon PO, Donovan LA. Perceptual framework for conservative treatment and rehabilitation of ankle sprains: an evidence-based paradigm shift. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):628638. PubMed ID: 31135210 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-474-17

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Hubbard TJ, Hertel J. Anterior positional fault of the fibula after sub-acute lateral ankle sprains. Man Ther. 2008;13(1):6367. PubMed ID: 17188923 doi:10.1016/j.math.2006.09.008

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Kavanaugh J. Is there a positional fault at the inferior tibiofibular joint in patients with acute or chronic ankle sprains compared to normals? Man Ther. 1999;4(1):1924.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Bianco L, Fermin S, Oates R, May J, Cheatham S, Nasypany A. Use of the Mulligan concept in the treatment of lateral ankle sprains in the active population: an exploratory prospective case series. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2019;63(3):154161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Hudson R, Baker RT, May J, Reordan D, Nasypany A. Novel treatment of lateral ankle sprains using the Mulligan concept: an exploratory case series analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2017;25(5):251259. PubMed ID: 29449767 doi:10.1080/10669817.2017.1332557

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    May JM, Nasypany A, Paolino J, Baker RT, Seegmiller J. Patient outcomes utilizing the Mulligan concept of mobilization with movement to treat intercollegiate patients diagnosed with lateral ankle sprain: an a priori case series. J Sport Rehab. 2017;26(6):486496. PubMed ID: 27834613 doi:10.1123/jsr.2015-0204

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Munn Z, Barker T, Moola S, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):21272133. PubMed ID: 33038125 doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Mulligan BR. Manual Therapy NAGS, SNAGS, MWMS etc. Wellington, New Zealand: Plane View Services Ltd; 2010.

  • 12.

    Baker R, Nasypany A, Seegmiller J, Baker J. The Mulligan concept: mobilizations with movement. Int J Athl Ther. 2013;18(1):3034. doi:10.1123/ijatt.18.1.30

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Ebell M, Siwek B, Woolf S, Susman J, Ewigman B, Bowman M. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Med. 2004;17(1):5967. doi:10.3122/jabfm.17.1.59

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Miranda J, Silva W, Silva H, Mascerenhas R, Oliveriera V. Effectiveness of cryotherapy on pain intensity, swelling, range of motion, function and recurrence in acute ankle sprain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther Sport. 2021;49:243249. PubMed ID: 33813154 doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.011

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Ferreira-Valente M, Pais-Ribeiro J, Jensen M. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2014;152(10):23992404. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Vela L, Denegar C. The disablement in the Physically Active Scale, part II: the psychometric properties of an outcomes scale for musculoskeletal injuries. J Athl Train. 2010;45(6):630641. PubMed ID: 21062187 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-45.6.630

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Ortega-Avila AB, Cervera-Garvi P, Marchena-Rodriguez A, et al. Conservative treatment for acute ankle sprain: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10):3128. doi:10.3390/jcm9103128

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Tully MA, Bleakley CM, O’Connor SR, McDonough SM. Functional management of ankle sprains: what volume and intensity of walking is undertaken in the first week postinjury. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(12):877882. PubMed ID: 22267573 doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090692

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Cross KM, Worrell TW, Leslie JE, Van Veld KR. The relationship between self-reported and clinical measures and the number of days to return to sport following acute lateral ankle sprains. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(1):1623. PubMed ID: 11787905 doi:10.2519/jospt.2002.32.1.16

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1406 1093 34
Full Text Views 169 153 4
PDF Downloads 221 205 5