The Blockchain Phenomenon: Conceptualizing Decentralized Networks and the Value Proposition to the Sport Industry

in International Journal of Sport Communication
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $63.00

1 year subscription

USD $84.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $119.00

2 year subscription

USD $156.00

The sport industry has experienced significant technological change in its environment with the recent rise of Bitcoin and its underlying foundation, blockchain. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to introduce and conceptually ground blockchain in sport and discuss the implications and value proposition of blockchain to the sport industry. After a brief overview of blockchain and the technology stack, the mechanism is conceptually rooted in the network paradigm, a framework already known to the academic sport community. This treatment argues that the decentralized, closed, and dense mesh network produced by blockchain technology is beneficial to the sport industry. Notably, the article identifies blockchain’s capacity to facilitate new sources of revenue and improve data management and suggests that sport management and communication consider the value of blockchain and the technology stack as the digital footprint in the industry intensifies and becomes increasingly complex.

The author is with the Dept. of Management, Faculty of Business and Law, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.

Address correspondence to michael.naraine@deakin.edu.au.
International Journal of Sport Communication
Article Sections
References
  • AchenR.M.KaczorowskiJ.HorsmannT. & KetzlerA. (2018). Exploring off-season content and interaction on Facebook: A comparison of U.S. professional sport leagues. International Journal of Sport Communication 11 389413. doi:10.1123/ijsc.2018-0013

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BambroughB. (2018June 12). Trump–Kim summit: Dennis Rodman–backed cryptocurrency Potcoin soars after meeting. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2018/06/12/trump-kim-summit-cryptocurrency-potcoin-is-deals-first-winner-adding-20/#75ba27221637

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BambroughB. (2019April 10). Coinbase and Visa are making Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple’s XRP and Litecoin payments a reality. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2019/04/10/coinbase-and-visa-are-making-bitcoin-ethereum-ripples-xrp-and-litecoin-payments-a-reality/#39f781ed5943

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BerryR. & ManoliA.E. (2018). Alternative revenue streams for centrally funded sport governing bodies. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 10(3) 429450. doi:10.1080/19406940.2017.1387587

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BlowsN. (2018May 9). SportyCo welcomes Luís Figo and prepares to host the world sports blockchain summit. Bitcoinist. Retrieved from http://bitcoinist.com/sportyco-welcomes-luis-figo-prepares-host-world-sports-biockchain-summit/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BorgattiS.P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27 5571. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008

  • BorgattiS.P. & FosterP.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management 29 9911013. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BorgattiS.P. & HalginD.S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science 22 11681181. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0641

  • BorgattiS.P.MehraA.BrassD.J. & LabiancaG. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323 892895. PubMed ID: 19213908 doi:10.1126/science.1165821

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of theory and research (pp. 24258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrowneR. (2017December 19). Big transaction fees are a problem for bitcoin—but there could be a solution. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/19/big-transactions-fees-are-a-problem-for-bitcoin.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BurtR. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

  • CaseyM.J. (2014June 18). BitPay to sponsor St. Petersburg Bowl in first major Bitcoin sports deal. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/bitpay-to-sponsor-st-petersburg-bowl-in-first-major-bitcoin-sports-deal-1403098202

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CharitouC.D. & MarkidesC.C. (2003). Responses to disruptive strategic innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 44 5563.

  • ChernyD. & LernerR. (2018August 28). Tigers left angry after latest AFL ticket fail. The Age. Retrieved from https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/ticketek-website-struggles-with-high-demand-for-afl-finals-tickets-20180828-p5006c.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChinF. (2017October 6). Arena funding debate: A play that always unfolds over several acts. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-election-2017-arena-funding-debate-explainer-eyeopener-extra-podcast-1.4342529

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CliffordC. (2018January 17). Billionaire Mark Cuban says the Dallas Mavericks will accept Bitcoin next season. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/17/mark-cuban-nbas-dallas-mavericks-will-accept-bitcoin-next-season.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CrosbyM.NachiappanPattanayakP.VermaS. & KalyanaramanV. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond Bitcoin. Applied Innovation Review 2 619.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CunninghamG.B.FairleyS.FerkinsL.KerwinS.LockD.ShawS. & WickerP. (2018). eSport: Construct specifications and implications for sport management. Sport Management Review 21 16. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.11.002

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FiloK.LockD. & KargA. (2015). Sport and social media research: A review. Sport Management Review 18 166181. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.11.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FosterG.O’ReillyN. & DávilaA. (2016). Sports business management: Decision making around the globe. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • FunkD.C.PizzoA.D. & BakerB.J. (2018). eSport management: Embracing eSport education and research opportunities. Sport Management Review 21 713. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.008

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GeurinA.N. & BurchL.M. (2017). User-generated branding via social media: An examination of six running brands. Sport Management Review 20 273284. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2016.09.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrellK.B.MaromD. & SwartR. (2015). Crowdfunding: The corporate era. London, England: Elliot & Thompson.

  • GrixJ. & CarmichaelF. (2012). Why do governments invest in elite sport? A polemic. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 4 7390. doi:10.1080/19406940.2011.627358

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HallmanmK. & GielT. (2018). eSports—Competitive sports or recreational activity? Sport Management Review 21 1420. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.011

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HambrickM.E. (2012). Six degrees of information: Using social network analysis to explore the spread of information within sport social networks. International Journal of Sport Communication 5 1634. doi:10.1123/ijsc.5.1.16

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HeereB. (2018). Embracing the sportification of society: Defining e-sports through a polymorphic view on sport. Sport Management Review 21 2124. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.002

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HeitnerD. (2018May 4). How blockchain tech can improve the sports and fitness industry with Netflix-like streaming options. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrenheitner/2018/05/04/how-blockchain-tech-can-improve-the-sports-and-fitness-industry-with-netflix-like-streaming-options/#2ad64db46159

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HoeberL. & HoeberO. (2012). Determinants of an innovation process: A case study of technological innovation in a community sport organization. Journal of Sport Management 26 213223. doi:10.1123/jsm.26.3.213

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HornB.P.CantorM. & FortR. (2015). Proximity and voting for professional sporting stadiums: The patter of support for the Seahawk stadium referendum. Contemporary Economic Policy 33 678688. doi:10.1111/coep.12108

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JensenJ.A. & CobbsJ.B. (2014). Predicting return on investment in sport sponsorship. Journal of Advertising Research 54 435447. doi:10.2501/JAR-54-4-435-447

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JosephP. (2016). A case study of records management practices in historic motor sport. Records Management Journal 26 314336. doi:10.1108/RMJ-08-2015-0031

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KatzM. & HeereB. (2015). Empowerment within brand communities: Overcoming the Achilles’ heel of scale-free networks. Sport Management Review 18 370383. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.10.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KatzM.WardR.M. & HeereB. (2018). Explaining attendance through the brand community triad: Integrating network theory and team identification. Sport Management Review 21 176188. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.06.004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KayeK. (2014January 21). How leagues, teams are using data to boost ticket sales, retain fans, help marketers. Ad Age. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/special-report-2014-sports/leagues-teams-data-boost-ticket-sales/291179/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KilduffM. & BrassD.J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals 4 317357. doi:10.1080/19416520.2010.494827

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KilduneJ. (2018May 26). Most successful ICOs of 2018 so far. Cryptoslate. Retrieved from https://cryptoslate.com/most-successful-icos-of-2018-so-far/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KwokA.O.J. & KohS.G.M. (2018). Is blockchain technology a watershed for tourism development? Current Issues in Tourism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13683500.2018.1513460

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22 2851.

  • MacIntoshE.W. & DohertyA. (2010). The influence of organizational culture on job satisfaction and intention to leave. Sport Management Review 13 106117. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2009.04.006

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacLeanJ.CousensL. & BarnesM. (2011). Look who’s linked with whom: A case study of one community basketball network. Journal of Sport Management 25 562575. doi:10.1123/jsm.25.6.562

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarrB. (2018March 2). Artificial intelligence and blockchain: 3 major benefits of combining these two mega-trends. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/03/02/artificial-intelligence-and-blockchain-3-major-benefits-of-combining-these-two-mega-trends/#62bd4cb4b44b

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MartínezF. (2017December 3). The blockchain and the sports industry. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@Globatalent/the-blockchain-and-the-sports-industry-13c6ea745d0e

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MasonD.S.SantS-L & SoebbingB. (2017). The peculiar economics of sports team ownership: Pursuing urban development in North American cities. Sport Business and Management: An International Journal 7 358374. doi:10.1108/SBM-10-2016-0067

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MasonD.S.WashingtonM. & BuistE.A.N. (2015). Signaling status through stadiums: The discourses of comparison within a hierarchy. Journal of Sport Management 29 539554. doi:10.1123/jsm.2014-0156

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MaurerB.NelmsT.C. & SwartzL. (2013). “When perhaps the real problem is money itself!” The practical materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics 23 261277. doi:10.1080/10350330.2013.777594

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MiddlebrookS.T. & HughesS.J. (2014). Regulating cryptocurrencies in the United States: Current issues and future directions. William Mitchell Law Review 40 814848.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MisenerK. & DohertyA. (2009). A case study of organizational capacity in nonprofit community sport. Journal of Sport Management 23 457482. doi:10.1123/jsm.23.4.457

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MollickE. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 29 116. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MorrisD.Z. (2017December 17). Bitcoin hits a new record high, but stops short of $20,000. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/12/17/bitcoin-record-high-short-of-20000/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NakamotoS. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.824/papers/bitcoin.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NaraineM.L. & KargA.J. (2019). Digital media in international sports : Engaging fans via social media and fantasy sports. In E. MacIntoshG. Bravo & M. Li (Eds.) International sport management (pp. 315331). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NaraineM.L. & ParentM.M. (2016a). “Birds of a feather”: An institutional approach to Canadian national sport organizations’ social-media use. International Journal of Sport Communication 9 140162. doi:10.1123/ijsc.2016-0010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NaraineM.L. & ParentM.M. (2016b). Illuminating centralized users in the social media ego network of two national sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management 30 689701. doi:10.1123/jsm.2016-0067

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NaraineM.L. & ParentM.M. (2017). Examining social media adoption and change to the stakeholder communication paradigm in not-for-profit sport organizations. Journal of Amateur Sport 3 5581. doi:10.17161/jas.v3i2.6492

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’ReillyN.J. & NadeauJ.P. (2006). Revenue generation in professional sport: A diagnostic analysis. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing 1 311330. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2006.010564

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParentM.M.NaraineM.L. & HoyeR. (2018). A new era for governance structures and processes in Canadian national sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management 32 555566. doi:10.1123/jsm.2018-0037

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParentM.M.RouillardC. & NaraineM.L. (2017). Network governance of a multi-level, multi-sectoral sport event: Difference in coordinating ties and actors. Sport Management Review 20 497509. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.02.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PegoraroA. (2014). Twitter as disruptive innovation in sport communication. Communication & Sport 2 132137. doi:10.1177/2167479514527432

  • PrellC. (2009). Linking social capital to small-worlds: A look at local and network-level processes and structure. Methodological Innovations Online 4 822. doi:10.1177/205979910900400102

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PrestonJ. (2018). Initial coin offerings: Innovation, democratization and the SEC. Duke Law & Technology Review 16 318322.

  • QuatmanC. & ChelladuraiP. (2008). Social network theory and analysis: A complementary lens for inquiry. Journal of Sport Management 22 338360. doi:10.1123/jsm.22.3.338

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RattenV. & FerreiraJ. (2016). Sport entrepreneurship and innovation. Oxon, England: Routledge.

  • RidgersN.D.TimperioA.BrownH.BallK.MacfarlaneS.LaiS.K.SalmonJ. (2018). Wearable activity tracker use among Australian adolescents: Usability and acceptability study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6 e86. PubMed ID: 29643054 doi:10.2196/mhealth.9199

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SallentO.PalauR. & GuiaJ. (2011). Exploring the legacy of sport events on sport tourism networks. European Sport Management Quarterly 11 397421. doi:10.1080/16184742.2011.599208

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SisamM.O’BrienM. & BeseltE. (2018May 27). Sport industry trends and insights. Symposium conducted at the 46th Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of CanadaToronto, Canada C. Bradish Chair.

    • Export Citation
  • SlackT. & ParentM.M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

  • SottasP-E.RobinsonN. & SaugyM. (2009). The athletes’ biological passport and indirect markers of blood doping. In D. Thieme& P. Hemmersbach (Eds.) Doping in sports: Biochemical principles effects and analysis (pp. 305326). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79087-7

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SwanM. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.

  • TapscottA. & TapscottD. (2017March 1). How blockchain is changing finance. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/03/how-blockchain-is-changing-finance

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TapscottD. & TapscottA. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money business and the world. New York, NY: Penguin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TooheyK. & TaylorT. (2008). Mega events, fear, and risk: Terrorism at the Olympic Games. Journal of Sport Management 22 451469. doi:10.1123/jsm.22.4.451

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WarnerS.BowersM.T. & DixonM.A. (2012). Team dynamics: A social network perspective. Journal of Sport Management 26 5366. doi:10.1123/jsm.26.1.53

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WashingtonM. & PattersonK.D.W. (2011). Hostile takeover or joint venture: Connections between institutional theory and sport management research. Sport Management Review 14 112. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2010.06.003

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WellmanB. & FrankK. (2001). Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support from personal communities. In N. LinK. Cook & R.S. Burt (Eds.) Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 233273). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WickerP. & BreuerC. (2011). Scarcity of resources in German non-profit sport clubs. Sport Management Review 14 188201. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2010.09.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhaoJ.L.FanS. & YanJ. (2016). Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue. Financial Innovation 2(28) 17. doi:10.1186/s40854-016-0049-2

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 139 139 139
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar