Physiological and Metabolic Responses to Exercise on Treadmill, Elliptical Trainer, and Stepper: Practical Implications for Training

in International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Click name to view affiliation

Andrew N. Bosch University of Cape Town

Search for other papers by Andrew N. Bosch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Kirsten C. Flanagan University of Cape Town

Search for other papers by Kirsten C. Flanagan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Maaike M. Eken Stellenbosch University

Search for other papers by Maaike M. Eken in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Adrian Withers University of Cape Town

Search for other papers by Adrian Withers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Jana Burger University of Cape Town

Search for other papers by Jana Burger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
, and
Robert P. Lamberts University of Cape Town
Stellenbosch University

Search for other papers by Robert P. Lamberts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
Restricted access

Elliptical trainers and steppers are proposed as useful exercise modalities in the rehabilitation of injured runners due to the reduced stress on muscles and joints when compared to running. This study compared the physiological responses to submaximal running (treadmill) with exercise on the elliptical trainer and stepper devices at three submaximal but identical workloads. Authors had 18 trained runners (male/female: N = 9/9, age: mean ± SD = 23 ± 3 years) complete randomized maximal oxygen consumption tests on all three modalities. Submaximal tests of 3 min were performed at 60%, 70%, and 80% of peak workload individually established for each modality. Breath-by-breath oxygen consumption, heart rate, fuel utilization, and energy expenditure were determined. The value of maximal oxygen consumption was not different between treadmill, elliptical, and stepper (49.3 ± 5.3, 48.0 ± 6.6, and 46.7 ± 6.2 ml·min−1·kg−1, respectively). Both physiological measures (oxygen consumption and heart rate) as well as carbohydrate and fat oxidation differed significantly between the different exercise intensities (60%, 70%, and 80%) but did not differ between the treadmill, elliptical trainer, and stepper. Therefore, the elliptical trainer and stepper are suitable substitutes for running during periods when a reduced running load is required, such as during rehabilitation from running-induced injury.

Bosch, Flanagan, Withers, Burger, and Lamberts are with the Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Eken and Lamberts are with the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa. Lamberts is also with the Institute of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.

Bosch (Andrew.bosch@uct.ac.za) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • American College of Sports Medicine. (2017). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bertelsen, M.L., Hulme, A., Petersen, J., Brund, R.K., Sørensen, H., Finch, C.F., … Nielsen, R.O. (2017). A framework for the etiology of running-related injuries. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27(11), 11701180. PubMed ID: 28329441 doi:10.1111/sms.12883

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, G.A., Cook, C.M., Krueger, R.D., & Heelan, K.A. (2010). Comparison of energy expenditure on a treadmill vs an elliptical device at a self-selected exercise intensity. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(6), 16431649. PubMed ID: 20453685 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cb2854

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalleck, L., Kravitz, L., & Robergs, R. (2004). Maximal exercise testing using the elliptical cross-trainer and treadmill. Journal of Exercise Physiology, 7(3), 94101. PubMed ID: 20093957 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2472

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durnin, J.V, & Womersley, J. (1974). Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: Measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. The British Journal of Nutrition, 32(1), 7797.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eken, M.M., Withers, A., Flanagan, K., Burger, J., Bosch, A., & Lamberts, R.P. (2020). Muscular activation patterns during exercise on the treadmill, stepper and elliptical trainer. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Advance online publication. PubMed ID: 32881840 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003743

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexibel statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175191. PubMed ID: 17695343 doi:10.3758/bf03193146

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frayn, K.N. (1983). Calculation of substrate oxidation from gaseous exchange rates in vivo. Journal of Applied Physiology, 55(2), 628634. PubMed ID: 6618956 doi:10.1152/jappl.1983.55.2.628

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fredericson, M. (1996). Common injuries in runners. Sports Medicine, 21(1), 4972. PubMed ID: 8771285 doi:10.2165/00007256-199621010-00005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Green, J.M., Crews, T.R., Pritchet, C., Mathfield, C., & Hall, L. (2004). Heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion during treadmill and elliptical exercise training. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98(1), 340348. PubMed ID: 15058894 doi:10.2466/pms.98.1.340-348

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joubert, D.P., Oden, G.L., & Estes, B.C. (2011). The effects of elliptical cross training on VO2max in recently trained runners. International Journal of Exercise Science, 4(1), 243251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mays, R.J., Boér, N.F., Mealey, L.M., Kim, K.H., & Goss, F.L. (2010). A comparison of practical assessment methods to determine treadmill, cycle, and elliptical ergometer VO2peak. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(5), 13251331. PubMed ID: 20393357 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c7c677

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mercer, J.A., Dufek, J.S., & Bates, B.T. (2001). Analysis of peak oxygen consumption and heart rate during elliptical and treadmill exercise. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 10, 4856. doi:10.1123/jsr.10.1.48

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moyna, N.M., Robertson, R.J., Meckes, C.L., Peoples, J.A., Millich, N.B., & Thompson, P.D. (2001). Intermodal comparison of energy expenditure at exercise intensities corresponding to the perceptual preference range. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33(8), 14041410. PubMed ID: 11474346 doi:10.1097/00005768-200108000-00025

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mujika, I., & Padilla, S. (2000). Detraining: Loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part II. Sports Medicine, 30(2), 7987. PubMed ID: 10999420 doi:10.2165/00007256-200030030-00001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ross, W., & Marfell-Jones, M. (1991). Kinanthropometry. In J. MacDougall, H. Wenger, & H. Green (Eds.), Physiological testing of the high performance athlete (pp. 223308). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roy, J.L., Smith, J.F., Bishop, P.A., Hallinan, C., Wang, M., & Hunter, G.R. (2004). Prediction of maximal VO2 from submaximal stairmaster test in young women. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 18(1), 9296. PubMed ID: 14971977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siegl, A., Kösel, E.M., Tam, N., Koschnick, S., Langerak, N., Skorski, S., … Lamberts, R. (2017). Submaximal markers of fatigue and overreaching; Implications for monitoring athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(9), 675682. PubMed ID: 28704885 doi:10.1055/s-0043-110226

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tarnopolsky, M.A. (2000). Gender differences in metabolism; nutrition and supplements. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 3(3), 287298. PubMed ID: 11101268 doi:10.1016/s1440-2440(00)80038-9

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turner, M.J., Williams, A.B., Williford, A.L., & Cordova, M.L. (2010). A comparison of physiologic and physical discomfort responses between exercise modalities. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(3), 796803. PubMed ID: 20093957 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2472

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van der Worp, M.P., ten Haaf, D.S.M., van Cingel, R., de Wijer, A., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W.G., & Staal, J.B. (2015). Injuries in runners: A systematic review on risk factors and sex differences. PLoS One, 10(2), e0114937. PubMed ID: 25706955 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114937

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Gent, R.N., Siem, D., van Middelkoop, M., van Os, A.G., Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.A., Koes, B.W., & Taunton, J.E. (2007). Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(8), 469480. PubMed ID: 17473005 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.033548

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zeni, A., Hoffman, M.D., & Clifford, P.S. (1996). Energy expenditure with indoor exercise machines. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 275(18), 14241427. PubMed ID: 8618368 doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530420052035

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4475 1265 82
Full Text Views 196 17 2
PDF Downloads 202 27 2