Between-Days Reliability and Sensitivity of Common Fatigue Measures in Rugby Players

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Gregory Roe
Search for other papers by Gregory Roe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joshua Darrall-Jones
Search for other papers by Joshua Darrall-Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kevin Till
Search for other papers by Kevin Till in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Padraic Phibbs
Search for other papers by Padraic Phibbs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dale Read
Search for other papers by Dale Read in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jonathon Weakley
Search for other papers by Jonathon Weakley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ben Jones
Search for other papers by Ben Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This study established the between-days reliability and sensitivity of a countermovement jump (CMJ), plyometric push-up, well-being questionnaire, and whole-blood creatine kinase concentration ([CK]) in elite male youth rugby union players. The study also established the between-days reliability of 1, 2, or 3 CMJs and plyometric-push-up attempts. Twenty-five players completed tests on 2 occasions separated by 5 d (of rest). Between-days typical error, coefficient of variation (CV), and smallest worthwhile change (SWC) were calculated for the well-being questionnaire, [CK], and CMJ and plyometric-push-up metrics (peak/mean power, peak/mean force, height, flight time, and flight-time to contraction-time ratio) for 1 maximal effort or taking the highest score from 2 or 3 maximal efforts. The results suggest that CMJ mean power (2 or 3 attempts), peak force, or mean force and plyometric-push-up mean force (from 2 or 3 attempts) should be used for assessing lower- and upper-body neuromuscular function, respectively, due to both their acceptable reliability (CV < 5%) and good sensitivity (CV < SWC). The well-being questionnaire and [CK] demonstrated between-days CVs >5% (7.1% and 26.1%, respectively) and poor sensitivity (CV > SWC). The findings from this study can be used when interpreting fatigue markers to make an objective decision about a player’s readiness to train or compete.

The authors are with the Inst for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, and Yorkshire Carnegie Rugby Club, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.

Address author correspondence to Gregory Roe at g.roe@leedsbeckett.ac.uk
  • Collapse
  • Expand