The Effect of Cycling Intensity on Cycling Economy During Seated and Standing Cycling

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Marco Arkesteijn
Search for other papers by Marco Arkesteijn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Simon Jobson
Search for other papers by Simon Jobson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James Hopker
Search for other papers by James Hopker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Louis Passfield
Search for other papers by Louis Passfield in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Background:

Previous research has shown that cycling in a standing position reduces cycling economy compared with seated cycling. It is unknown whether the cycling intensity moderates the reduction in cycling economy while standing.

Purpose:

The aim was to determine whether the negative effect of standing on cycling economy would be decreased at a higher intensity.

Methods:

Ten cyclists cycled in 8 different conditions. Each condition was either at an intensity of 50% or 70% of maximal aerobic power at a gradient of 4% or 8% and in the seated or standing cycling position. Cycling economy and muscle activation level of 8 leg muscles were recorded.

Results:

There was an interaction between cycling intensity and position for cycling economy (P = .03), the overall activation of the leg muscles (P = .02), and the activation of the lower leg muscles (P = .05). The interaction showed decreased cycling economy when standing compared with seated cycling, but the difference was reduced at higher intensity. The overall activation of the leg muscles and the lower leg muscles, respectively, increased and decreased, but the differences between standing and seated cycling were reduced at higher intensity.

Conclusions:

Cycling economy was lower during standing cycling than seated cycling, but the difference in economy diminishes when cycling intensity increases. Activation of the lower leg muscles did not explain the lower cycling economy while standing. The increased overall activation, therefore, suggests that increased activation of the upper leg muscles explains part of the lower cycling economy while standing.

Arkesteijn is with the Inst of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Wales. Jobson is with the Dept of Sport and Exercise, University of Winchester, Hampshire, England. Hopker and Passfield are with the School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Kent, England.

Address author correspondence to Marco Arkesteijn at maa36@aber.ac.uk.
  • Collapse
  • Expand