The Effect of Variation of Plyometric Push-Ups on Force-Application Kinetics and Perception of Intensity

Click name to view affiliation

Wissem Dhahbi
Search for other papers by Wissem Dhahbi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anis Chaouachi
Search for other papers by Anis Chaouachi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anis Ben Dhahbi
Search for other papers by Anis Ben Dhahbi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jodie Cochrane
Search for other papers by Jodie Cochrane in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laurence Chèze
Search for other papers by Laurence Chèze in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Angus Burnett
Search for other papers by Angus Burnett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Karim Chamari
Search for other papers by Karim Chamari in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Purpose:

To examine differences between ground-reaction-force (GRF)-based parameters collected from 5 types of plyometric push-ups. Between-trials reliability and the relationships between parameters were also assessed.

Methods:

Thirty-seven highly active commando soldiers performed 3 trials of 5 variations of the plyometric push-up in a counterbalanced order: standard countermovement push-up (SCPu), standard squat push-up (SSPu), kneeling countermovement push-up (KCPu), kneeling squat push-up (KSPu), and drop-fall push-up (DFPu). Vertical GRF was measured during these exercises using a portable Kistler force plate. The GRF applied by the hands in the starting position (initial force supported), peak GRF and rate of force development during takeoff, flight time, impact force, and rate of force development impact on landing were determined.

Results:

During standard-position exercises (SCPu and SSPu) the initial force supported and impact force were higher (P < .001) than with kneeling exercises (KCPu, KSPu, and DFPu). The peak GRF and rate of force development during takeoff were higher (P < .001) in the countermovement push-up exercises ([CMP] SCPu, KCPu, and DFPu) than squat push-up exercises ([SP] SSPu and KSPu). Furthermore, the flight time was greater (P < .001) during kneeling exercises than during standard-position exercises. A significant relationship (P < .01) between impact force and the rate of force development impact was observed for CMP and SP exercises (r = .83 and r = .62, respectively). The initial force supported was also negatively related (P < .01) to the flight time for both CMP and SP (r = –.74 and r = –.80, respectively). It was revealed that the initial force supported and the peak GRF during takeoff had excellent reliability; however, other parameters had poor absolute reliability.

Conclusions:

It is possible to adjust the intensity of plyometric push-up exercises and train athletes’ muscle power by correctly interpreting GRF-based parameters. However, caution is required as some parameters had marginal absolute reliability.

Dhahbi and Chaouachi are with the Tunisian Research Laboratory “Sport Performance Optimization,” National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports, Tunis, Tunisia. Ben Dhahbi is with the Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia. Cochrane and Burnett are with the School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia. Chèze is with the Laboratory of Shock Biomechanics and Mechanics, University of Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France. Chamari is with the Athlete Health and Performance Research Center, ASPETAR, Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Address author correspondence to Wissem Dhahbi at wissem.dhahbi@gmail.com.
  • Collapse
  • Expand