Assessing Overreaching With Heart-Rate Recovery: What Is the Minimal Exercise Intensity Required?

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Yann Le Meur
Search for other papers by Yann Le Meur in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Martin Buchheit
Search for other papers by Martin Buchheit in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anaël Aubry
Search for other papers by Anaël Aubry in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Aaron J Coutts
Search for other papers by Aaron J Coutts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Christophe Hausswirth
Search for other papers by Christophe Hausswirth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Purpose:

Faster heart-rate recovery (HRR) after high to maximal exercise (≥90% of maximal heart rate) has been reported in athletes suspected of functional overreaching (f-OR). This study investigated whether this response would also occur at lower exercise intensity.

Methods:

Responses of HRR and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were compared during an incremental intermittent running protocol to exhaustion in 20 experienced male triathletes (8 control subjects and 13 overload subjects led to f-OR) before and immediately after an overload training period and after a 1-wk taper.

Results:

Both groups demonstrated an increase in HRR values immediately after the training period, but this change was very likely to almost certainly larger in the f-OR group at all running intensities (large to very large differences, eg, +16 ± 7 vs +3 ± 5 beats/min, in the f-OR and control groups at 11 km/h, respectively). The highest between-groups differences in changes in HRR were reported at 11 km/h (13 ± 4 beats/min) and 12 km/h (10 ± 6 beats/min). A concomitant increase in RPE at all intensities was reported only in the f-OR group (large to extremely large differences, +2.1 ± 1.5 to +0.7 ± 1.5 arbitrary units).

Conclusion:

These findings confirm that faster HRR does not systematically predict better physical performance. However, when interpreted in the context of the athletes’ fatigue state and training phase, HRR after submaximal exercise may be more discriminant than HRR measures taken after maximal exercise for monitoring f-OR. These findings may be applied in practice by regularly assessing HRR after submaximal exercise (ie, warm-up) for monitoring endurance athletes’ responses to training.

Le Meur, Aubry, and Hausswirth are with the Laboratory of Sport, Expertise and Performance (EA 7370), French National Inst of Sport, Expertise and Performance (INSEP), Paris, France. Buchheit is with the Performance Dept, Paris Saint Germain Football Club, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France. Coutts is with the Sport and Exercise Discipline Group, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Address correspondence to Yann Le Meur at ylmsportscience@gmail.com.
  • Collapse
  • Expand