Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD  $107.00

1 year subscription

USD  $142.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD  $203.00

2 year subscription

USD  $265.00

Purpose: Recent studies have shown that soccer players’ responses are similar on natural grass (NG) and artificial turf (AT), but they did not control the mechanical properties of these surfaces. This work aimed to analyze the influence of the game surface on amateur soccer players’ physical and physiological responses using a soccer simulation protocol. Methods: A total of 16 amateur players performed 3 bouts of the soccer simulation protocol on AT, and, on another day, 3 bouts on NG. The mechanical properties of both surfaces were recorded. The order of surfaces was randomly established for each participant. Physiological responses of players were assessed before and after the 6-repeated-sprints test existing at the midpoint of each bout. Fatigue (% best; % diff) and general variables (total time; best time, mean time; maximum speed) for both the repeated sprint test (RST) and the agility tests (nonlinear actions at maximum speed) incorporated into the soccer simulation protocol were also analyzed. Results: The 2 surfaces displayed different mechanical properties. Physical responses were found similar for both surfaces (P > .05) before and after the RST. There were no surface differences in sprint times or fatigue variables for the RST (P > .05). The agility test was faster on AT than on NG in bout 1 (average speed [+1.17 km/h;P = .037]; agility test cut time [−0.31 s; P = .027] and best time [−0.52 s; P = .042]). Conclusions: The differences in the mechanical properties of the 2 surfaces are not sufficient to cause differences in the physiological and physical responses of soccer players, although they may affect turns and cuts.

López-Fernández, Colino, and Gallardo are with the IGOID Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain. Sánchez-Sánchez, García-Unanue, and Felipe are with the School of Sport Science, European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

López-Fernández (jorgelopfdez@gmail.com) is corresponding author.
  • 1.

    Burillo P, Gallardo L, Felipe JL, Gallardo AM. Mechanical assessment of artificial turf football pitches: the consequences of no quality certification. Sci Res Essays. 2012;7(28):24572465.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    FIFA. FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf. Handbook of Test Methods. Zurich, Switzerland: FIFA; 2015.

  • 3.

    Sánchez-Sánchez J, García-Unanue J, Jiménez-Reyes P, et al. Influence of the mechanical properties of third-generation artificial turf systems on soccer players’ physiological and physical performance and their perceptions. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):111368. PubMed doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111368

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Andersson H, Ekblom B, Krustrup P. Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: movement patterns, technical standards, and player impressions. J Sports Sci. 2008;26(2):113122. PubMed doi:10.1080/02640410701422076

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Burillo P, Gallardo L, Felipe JL, Gallardo AM. Artificial turf surfaces: perception of safety, sporting feature, satisfaction and preference of football users. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(suppl 1):S437447. PubMed doi:10.1080/17461391.2012.713005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Hughes MG, Birdsey L, Meyers R, et al. Effects of playing surface on physiological responses and performance variables in a controlled football simulation. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(8):878886. PubMed doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.757340

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Nédélec M, McCall A, Carling C, Le Gall F, Berthoin S, Dupont G. Physical performance and subjective ratings after a soccer-specific exercise simulation: comparison of natural grass versus artificial turf. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(5):529536. PubMed doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.738923

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Stone KJ, Hughes MG, Stembridge MR, Meyers RW, Newcombe DJ, Oliver JL. The influence of playing surface on physiological and performance responses during and after soccer simulation. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;16(1):4249. PubMed doi:10.1080/17461391.2014.984768

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Encarnación-Martínez A, García-Gallart A, Gallardo AM, Sánchez-Sáez JA, Sánchez-Sánchez J. Effects of structural components of artificial turf on the transmission of impacts in football players. Sports Biomech. 2017:110. PubMed doi:10.1080/14763141.2017.1285347

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Sánchez-Sánchez J, Felipe JL, Burillo P, del Corral J, Gallardo L. Effect of the structural components of support on the loss of mechanical properties of football fields of artificial turf. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol. 2014;228(3):155164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Sánchez-Sánchez J, García-Unanue J, Felipe JL, et al. Physical and physiological responses of amateur football players on 3rd generation artificial turf systems during simulated game situations. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(11):31653177. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001415

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Stone KJ, Oliver JL, Hughes MG, Stembridge M, Newcombe DJ, Meyers RW. Development of a soccer simulation protocol to include repeated sprints and agility. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011;6(3):427431. PubMed doi:10.1123/ijspp.6.3.427

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Bangsbo J, Iaia FM, Krustrup P. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test. Sports Med. 2008;38(1):3751. PubMed doi:10.2165/00007256-200838010-00004

  • 14.

    Brito J, Krustrup P, Rebelo A. The influence of the playing surface on the exercise intensity of small-sided recreational soccer games. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(4):946956. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.08.011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology: a power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155159. PubMed doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

  • 16.

    Ubago-Guisado E, García-Unanue J, López-Fernández J, Sánchez-Sánchez J, Gallardo L. Association of different types of playing surfaces with bone mass in growing girls. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(15):14841492. PubMed doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1223328

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Bangsbo J, Mohr M, Krustrup P. Physical and metabolic demands of training and match-play in the elite football player. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(7):665674. PubMed doi:10.1080/02640410500482529

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    . Di Michele R, Di Renzo AM, Ammazzalorso S, Merni F. Comparison of physiological responses to an incremental running test on treadmill, natural grass, and synthetic turf in young soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(3):939945. PubMed doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a07b6e

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    McGhie D, Ettema G. Biomechanical analysis of surface-athlete impacts on third-generation artificial turf. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):177185. PubMed doi:10.1177/0363546512464697

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Gains GL, Swedenhjelm AN, Mayhew JL, Bird HM, Houser JJ. Comparison of speed and agility performance of college football players on field turf and natural grass. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(10):26132617. PubMed doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181eccdf8

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Binnie MJ, Dawson B, Pinnington H, Landers G, Peeling P. Sand training: a review of current research and practical applications. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(1):815. PubMed doi:10.1080/02640414.2013.805239

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Villwock MR, Meyer EG, Powell JW, Fouty AJ, Haut RC. The effects of various infills, fibre structures, and shoe designs on generating rotational traction on an artificial surface. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol. 2009;223(1):1119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Sassi A, Stefanescu A, Bosio A, Riggio M, Rampinini E. The cost of running on natural grass and artificial turf surfaces. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(3):606611. PubMed doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c7baf9

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 199 183 41
Full Text Views 15 11 1
PDF Downloads 2 2 0