Effect of the Pacing Strategies on the Open-Water 10-km World Swimming Championships Performances

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $107.00

1 year subscription

USD $142.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $203.00

2 year subscription

USD $265.00

Purpose: To (1) compare the pacing strategies of different-level open-water swimmers during the 10-km race of the FINA 2015 Swimming World Championships and (2) relate these pacing strategies to the race performance. Methods: Final and intermediate split times, as well as intermediate race positions, from the 10-km race participants (69 men and 51 women) were collected from the public domain and were divided into 5 groups (G1–G5) depending on their finishing positions. Results: Medalists and finalists (G1 and G2, respectively) presented an even pacing profile with swimming velocities similar to those of the less successful swimmers (G3–G5) on the initial and middle stages of the race but a 1.5–3% increase in swimming velocity in the last quarter of the race. This acceleration toward the end of the race, or “end spurt,” was largely related to the race performance and was not observed in the G3 and G4 (even-paced profile) or G5 (positive pacing profile) groups. Intermediate race positions and lap rankings were negatively related to finishing position, indicating a delayed positioning of the most successful swimmers at 25%, 50%, and 75% of race distance. Conclusions: The adoption of a conservative starting strategy by open-water swimmers with a negative pacing profile and delayed partial positioning seems to increase the chances of overall race success, as it allows a fast end spurt that is closely related to successful finishing race positions.

Rodriguez is with the Catalonian Swimming Federation and the High Performance Center, Barcelona, Spain. Veiga is with the Madrid Swimming Federation, Madrid, Spain, and the Health and Human Performance Dept, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Veiga (Santiago.veiga@upm.es) is corresponding author.
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Article Sections
References
  • 1.

    Zingg MARüst CARosemann TLepers RKnechtle B. Analysis of swimming performance in FINA World Cup long-distance open water races. Extrem Physiol Med. 2014;3:210. PubMed ID: 24382200 doi:10.1186/2046-7648-3-2

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Swiss Luxury Watch Manufacturer. Omega SA website. http://www.omegatiming.com/Sport. Accessed May 10 2016.

    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Khodaee MBuck KSpittler JGrothe HSaeidi AReed A. Pain management, cognitive strength and exercise addiction in ultra marathon runners. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11:S1-1S1-6. doi:10.1123/IJSPP.2016-0495

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Van Heest JLMahnoey CEHerr L. Characteristics of elite open-water swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18:302305. PubMed ID: 15142018 doi:10.1519/R-13513.1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Van Ingen Schenau GJde Koning JJde Groot G. Optimisation of sprinting performance in running, cycling and speed skating. Sports Med. 1994;17:259275. PubMed ID: 8009139 doi:10.2165/00007256-199417040-00006

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Thiel CFoster CBanzer Wde Koning J. Pacing in Olympic track races: competitive tactics versus best performance strategy. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:11071115. PubMed ID: 22738897 doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.701759

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Tucker RLambert MINoakes TD. An analysis of pacing strategies during men’s world-record performances in track athletics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006;1:233245. PubMed ID: 19116437 doi:10.1123/ijspp.1.3.233

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Garland SW. An analysis of the pacing strategy adopted by elite competitors in 2000 m rowing. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:3942. PubMed ID: 15618339 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2003.010801

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Abbiss CRLaursen PB. Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition. Sports Med. 2008;38:239252. PubMed ID: 18278984 doi:10.2165/00007256-200838030-00004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Abbiss CRThompson KGLipski MMeyer TSkorski S. Difference in pacing between time- and distance-based time trials in trained cyclists. Int J Sports Physio. Perform. 2016;11:10181023. PubMed ID: 26868360 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0613

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Foster CGreen MASnyder ACThompson NN. Physiological responses during simulated competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:877882. PubMed ID: 8350712 doi:10.1249/00005768-199307000-00018

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Smits BLPepping GJHettinga FJ. Pacing and decision making in sport and exercise: the roles of perception and action in the regulation of exercise intensity. Sports Med. 2014;44:763775. PubMed ID: 24706362 doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0163-0

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Renfree A. St Clair Gibson A. Influence of different performance levels on pacing strategy during the women’s World Championship marathon race. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8:279285. PubMed ID: 23006811 doi:10.1123/ijspp.8.3.279

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Hanley B. Pacing, packing and sex-based differences in Olympic and IAAF World Championship marathons. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:16751681. PubMed ID: 26736042 doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1132841

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Chatard JCWilson B. Drafting distance in swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:11761181. PubMed ID: 12840639 doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000074564.06106.1F

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Lukes RAChin SBHaake SJ. The understanding and development of cycling aerodynamics. Sports Eng. 2005;8:5974. doi:10.1007/BF02844004

  • 17.

    Janssen MWilson BDToussaint HM. Effects of drafting on hydrodynamic and metabolic responses in front crawl swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:837843. PubMed ID: 19276849 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818f2a9b

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Vernillo GPiacentini MFDrake AAgnello LFiorella PLa Torre A. Exercise intensity and pacing strategy of a 5-km indoor race walk during a world record attempt: a case study. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:20482052. PubMed ID: 21701290 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e4f78e

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112155159. PubMed ID: 19565683 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

  • 20.

    Hopkins WGMarshall SWBatterham AMHanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:313. PubMed ID: 19092709 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Vogt PRüst CARosemann TLepers RKnechtle B. Analysis of 10 km swimming performance of elite male and female open-water swimmers. Springerplus. 2013;2:603. PubMed ID: 24324922 doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-603

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Pyne DBLee HSwanwick KM. Monitoring the lactate threshold in world-ranked swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:291297. PubMed ID: 11224820 doi:10.1097/00005768-200102000-00019

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Keskinen KLKeskinen OPMero A. Effects of pool length on biomechanical performance in front crawl swimming. In: Troup JPHollander APStrasse DTrappe SWCappaert JMTrappe TA eds. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VII. London, UK: E & FN Spon; 1996:216220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Zamparo PBonifazi MFaina Met al. Energy cost of swimming of elite long-distance swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94:697704. PubMed ID: 15887025 doi:10.1007/s00421-005-1337-0

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Renfree ACrivoi do Carmo EMartin LPeters DM. The influence of collective behavior on pacing in endurance competitions. Front Physiol. 2015;6:373. PubMed ID: 26696903 doi:10.3389/fphys.2015.00373

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Foster Cde Koning JJHettinga Fet al. Effect of competitive distance on energy expenditure during simulated competition. Int J Sports Med. 2004;25:198204. PubMed ID: 15088244 doi:10.1055/s-2003-45260

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Abbiss CRRoss MLGarvican LAet al. The distribution of pace adopted by cyclists during a cross-country mountain bike World Championships. J Sports Sci. 2013;31:787794. PubMed ID: 23521618 doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.751118

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Lipin´ska PAllen SVHopkins WG. Relationships between pacing parameters and performance of elite male 1500 m swimmers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11:159163. PubMed ID: 26114929 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0117

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Lipin´ska PAllen SVHopkins WG. Modeling parameters that characterize pacing of elite female 800 m freestyle swimmers. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16:287292. PubMed ID: 25703479 doi:10.1080/17461391.2015.1013996

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    March DSVanderburgh PMTitlebaum PJHoops ML. Age, sex, and finish time as determinants of pacing in the marathon. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(2):386391. PubMed ID: 20224445 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bffd0f

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Deaner ROCarter REJoyner MJHunter SK. Men are more likely than women to slow in the marathon. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:607616. PubMed ID: 24983344 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000432

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 60 60 27
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Downloads 1 1 0
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar