Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $107.00

1 year subscription

USD $142.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $203.00

2 year subscription

USD $265.00

Purpose: Session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) is an often-used measure to assess athletes’ training load (TL). However, little is known about which factors could optimize the quality of data collection thereof. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the survey methods and the time points when sRPE was assessed on the correlation between subjective (sRPE) and objective (heart-rate training impulse; TRIMP) assessment of TL. Methods: In the first part of the study, 45 well-trained subjects (30 men and 15 women) performed 20 running sessions with a heart-rate monitor and reported sRPE 30 min after training cessation. For the reporting, the subjects were grouped into 3 groups (paper–pencil, online questionnaire, and mobile device). In the second part of the study, another 40 athletes (28 men and 12 women) performed 4 × 5 running sessions with the 4 time points to report the sRPE randomly assigned (directly after training cessation, 30 min postexercise, in the evening of the same day, and the next morning directly after waking up). Results: The assessment of sRPE is influenced by time point, survey method, TRIMP, sex, and training type. It is recommended to assess sRPE values via a mobile device or online tool, as the paper survey method displayed lower correlations between sRPE and TRIMP. Conclusions: Subjective TL measures are highly individual. When compared with the same relative intensity, lower sRPE values were reported by women for the training types representing slow runs and for time points with greater duration between training cessation and sRPE assessment. The assessment method for sRPE should be kept constant for each athlete, and comparisons between athletes or sexes are not recommended.

Roos, Frei, and Wyss are with the Swiss Federal Inst of Sport Magglingen SFISM, Magglingen, Switzerland. Roos and Taube are with the Dept of Medicine, Movement and Sport Science, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland. Tuch is with the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Inst of Sport Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany, and the Dept of Sports and Sport Science, Karlsruhe Inst of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Roos (lilian.roos@baspo.admin.ch) is corresponding author.
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Article Sections
References
  • 1.

    Coutts AJCormack S. Monitoring the training response. In: Joyce DLewindon D eds. High-Performance Training for Sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2014:7184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Sands WAStone MH. Monitoring the elite athlete. Olympic Coach. 2005;17(3):412.

  • 3.

    Edwards S. Heart Rate Monitor Book. Sacramento, CA: Fleet Feet Press; 1993.

  • 4.

    Banister EW. Modeling Elite Athletic Performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1991.

  • 5.

    Foster CDaines EHector LSnyder ACWelsh R. Athletic performance in relation to training load. Wis Med J. 1996;95(6):370374. PubMed ID: 8693756

  • 6.

    Foster CHector LLWelsh RSchrager MGreen MASnyder AC. Effects of specific versus cross-training on running performance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70(4):367372. PubMed ID: 7649149 doi:10.1007/BF00865035

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Foster CFlorhaug JAFranklin Jet al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):109115. PubMed ID: 11708692

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Noble BJBorg GAJacobs ICeci RKaiser P. A category-ratio perceived exertion scale: relationship to blood and muscle lactates and heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15(6):523528. PubMed ID: 6656563 doi:10.1249/00005768-198315060-00015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Borresen JLambert MI. Quantifying training load: a comparison of subjective and objective methods. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008;3(1):1630. PubMed ID: 19193951 doi:10.1123/ijspp.3.1.16

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Herman LFoster CMaher MAMikat RPPorcari JP. Validity and reliability of the session RPE method for monitoring exercise intensity. S Afr J Sports Med. 2006;18(1):1417. doi:10.17159/2078-516X/2006/v18i1a247

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Saw AEMain LCGastin PB. Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):281291. PubMed ID: 26423706 doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094758

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med. 2014;44(suppl 2):139147. PubMed ID: 25200666 doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Foster CHeimann KMEsten PLBrice GPorcari JP. Differences in perceptions of training by coaches and athletes. S Afr J Sports Med. 2001;8:37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Kilpatrick MWRobertson RJPowers JMMears JLFerrer NF. Comparisons of RPE before, during, and after self-regulated aerobic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):682687. PubMed ID: 19204580 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818a0f09

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Day MLMcGuigan MRBrice GFoster C. Monitoring exercise intensity during resistance training using the session RPE scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(2):353358. PubMed ID: 15142026

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Sweet TWFoster CMcGuigan MRBrice G. Quantitation of resistance training using the session rating of perceived exertion method. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(4):796802. PubMed ID: 15574104

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Hornsby JHGreen JMO’Neal EKKillen LLMcIntosh JRCoates TE. Influence of terminal RPE on session RPE. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(10):28002805. PubMed ID: 23302757 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182830d6c

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Kraft JAGreen JMThompson KR. Session ratings of perceived exertion responses during resistance training bouts equated for total work but differing in work rate. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(2):540545. PubMed ID: 24476745 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b569c

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Egan ADWinchester JBFoster CMcGuigan MR. Using session RPE to monitor different methods of resistance exercise. J Sport Sci Med. 2006;5(2):289295. PubMed ID: 24260002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Uchida MCTeixeira LFGodoi VJet al. Does the timing of measurement alter session-RPE in boxers? J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(1):5965. PubMed ID: 24570606

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Christen JFoster CPorcari JPMikat RP. Temporal robustness of the session rating of perceived exertion. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(8):10881093. PubMed ID: 26999454 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0438

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Singh FFoster CTod DMcGuigan MR. Monitoring different types of resistance training using session rating of perceived exertion. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007;2(1):3445. PubMed ID: 19255453 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2.1.34

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Lupo CCapranica LCortis CGuidotti FBianco ATessitore A. Session-RPE for quantifying load of different youth taekwondo training sessions. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017;57(3):189194. PubMed ID: 26796074 doi:10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06021-X

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Chow GC. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica. 1960;28(3):591605. doi:10.2307/1910133

  • 25.

    Zuidgeest MHendriks MKoopman LSpreeuwenberg PRademakers J. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients’ experiences with breast care. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):68. PubMed ID: 21946048 doi:10.2196/jmir.1241

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Kongsved SMBasnov MHolm-Christensen KHjollund NH. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e25. PubMed ID: 17942387 doi:10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Hohwu LLyshol HGissler MJonsson SHPetzold MObel C. Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: a mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e173. PubMed ID: 23978658 doi:10.2196/jmir.2595

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Minganti CFerragina ADemarie SVerticchio NMeeusen RPiacentini MF. The use of session RPE for interval training in master endurance athletes: should rest be included? J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011;51(4):547554. PubMed ID: 22212255

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Robertson RJMoyna NMSward KLMillich NBGoss FLThompson PD. Gender comparison of RPE at absolute and relative physiological criteria. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(12):21202129. PubMed ID: 11128861 doi:10.1097/00005768-200012000-00024

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Morishita SYamauchi SChiharu FDomen K. Rating of perceived exertion for quantification of the intensity of resistance exercises. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;1(9):14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    O’Connor PJPoudevigne MSPasley JD. Perceived exertion responses to novel elbow flexor eccentric action in women and men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(5):862868. doi:10.1097/00005768-200205000-00021

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 76 76 23
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cited By