Polarized Versus High-Intensity Multimodal Training in Recreational Runners

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $107.00

1 year subscription

USD $142.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $203.00

2 year subscription

USD $265.00

Purpose: This study longitudinally compared changes in running performance (5-km time trial) and fitness (maximal oxygen uptake [VO2max] and body composition [BC]) between polarized training and CrossFit Endurance (CFE) in recreational runners. Methods: Participants (N = 21) completed 12 wk of CFE or polarized endurance training (POL). Both groups trained 5 d·wk−1. POL ran 5 d·wk−1, whereas CFE ran 3 d·wk−1 and performed CrossFit 3 d·wk−1 (run + CrossFit 1 d·wk−1). Intensity was classified as low, moderate, or high (zone 1, 2, or 3) according to ventilatory thresholds. POL was prescribed greater volume (295 [67] min·wk−1), distributed as 85%/5%/10% in Z1/Z2/Z3. CFE emphasized a lower volume (110 [18] min·wk−1) distribution of 48%/8%/44%. Results: POL ran 283 (75.9) min·wk−1 and 47.3 (11.6) km·wk−1, both exceeding the 117 (32.2) min·wk−1 and 19.3 (7.17) km·wk−1 in CFE (P < .001). The POL distribution (74%/11%/15%) had greater total and percentage Z1 (P < .001) than CFE (46%/15%/39%), which featured higher percentage Z3 (P < .001). Time trial improved −93.8 (40.4) s (−6.21% [2.16%]) in POL (P < .001) and −84.2 (65.7) s (−5.49% [3.56%]) in CFE (P = .001). BC improved by −2.45% (2.59%) fat in POL (P = .02) and −2.62% (2.53%) in CFE (P = .04). The magnitude of improvement was not different between groups for time trial (P = .79) or BC (P = .88). Both groups increased VO2max (P ≤ .01), but with larger magnitude (P = .04, d = 0.85) in POL (4.3 [3.6] mL·kg·min−1) than CFE (1.78 [1.9] mL·kg·min−1). Conclusions: Recreational runners achieved similar improvement in 5-km performance and BC through polarized training or CFE, but POL yielded a greater increase in VO2max. Extrapolation to longer distances requires additional research.

The authors are with the Dept of Exercise Science, Bellarmine University, Louisville, KY.

Carnes (acarnes@bellarmine.edu) is corresponding author.
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Article Sections
References
  • 1.

    Hydren JRCohen BS. Current scientific evidence for a polarized cardiovascular endurance training model. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(12):35233530. PubMed ID: 26595137 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001197

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Seiler S. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):276291. PubMed ID: 20861519 doi:10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Running USA. US Road Race Trends. Running USA. March 232017. https://runningusa.org/RUSA/News/2018/U.S_Road_Race_Participation_Numbers_Hold_Steady_for_2017.aspx

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Muñoz ISeiler SBautista JEspaña JLarumbe EEsteve-Lanao J. Does polarized training improve performance in recreational runners? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(2):265272. PubMed ID: 23752040 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2012-0350

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Billat VLDemarle ASlawinski JPaiva MKoralsztein JP. Physical and training characteristics of top-class marathon runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(12):20892097. PubMed ID: 11740304 doi:10.1097/00005768-200112000-00018

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Fiskerstrand ÅSeiler K. Training and performance characteristics among Norwegian International rowers 1970–2001. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004;14(5):303310. PubMed ID: 15387804 doi:10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.370.x

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Arne GEike E. Training methods and intensity distribution of young world-class rowers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2009;4(4):448460. PubMed ID: 20029096 doi:10.1123/ijspp.4.4.448

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Orie JHofman Nde Koning JJFoster C. Thirty-eight years of training distribution in Olympic speed skaters. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(1):9399. PubMed ID: 24408352 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0427

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Sandbakk ØHolmberg HCLeirdal SEttema G. The physiology of world-class sprint skiers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):916. PubMed ID: 20500558 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01117.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Seiler KSKjerland . Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16(1):4956. PubMed ID: 16430681 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00418.x

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Steinacker JMLormes WLehmann MAltenburg D. Training of rowers before world championships. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(7):11581163. PubMed ID: 9662689 doi:10.1097/00005768-199807000-00022

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Esteve-lanao JSan Juan AFEarnest CPFoster CLucia A. How do endurance runners actually train? Relationship with competition performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(3):496504. PubMed ID: 15741850 doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000155393.78744.86

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Esteve-Lanao JFoster CSeiler SLucia A. Impact of training intensity distribution on performance in endurance athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(3):943. PubMed ID: 17685689

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Neal CMHunter AMBrennan Let al. Six weeks of a polarized training-intensity distribution leads to greater physiological and performance adaptations than a threshold model in trained cyclists. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114(4):461471. PubMed ID: 23264537 doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00652.2012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Stöggl TSperlich B. Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training. Front Physiol. 2014;5:33. PubMed ID: 24550842 doi:10.3389/fphys.2014.00033

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Thompson WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2017. ACSM’s Health Fitness J. 2016;20(6):817.

  • 17.

    Van Gent BRSiem DDvan Middelkoop Mvan Os TABierma-Zeinstra SSKoes BB. Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(8):469480. PubMed ID: 17473005 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.033548

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Mackenzie B. A new way to train: interview with Brian MacKenzie. Competitor. November 102014. http://running.competitor.com/2014/11/news/new-way-train-interview-brian-mackenzie_1175232014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Hak PTHodzovic EHickey B. The nature and prevalence of injury during CrossFit training [published online ahead of print November 22 2013]. J Strength Cond Res. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000318

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Mackenzie B. Brian MacKenzie’s 12-week CrossFit Endurance advanced training program. Competitor. May 272011. http://running.competitor.com/2011/05/training/brian-mackenzies-12-week-crossfit-endurance-advanced-training-program_284002013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    McCrory MAMolé PAGomez TDDewey KGBernauer EM. Body composition by air-displacement plethysmography by using predicted and measured thoracic gas volumes. J Appl Physiol. 1998;84(4):14751479. PubMed ID: 9516218 doi:10.1152/jappl.1998.84.4.1475

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Lucía AHoyos JSantalla AEarnest AChicharro J. Tour de France versus Vuelta a España: which is harder? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(5):872878. PubMed ID: 12750600 doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000064999.82036.B4

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Foster JPCarl HKara MEsten PLBrice G. Differences in perceptions of training by coaches and athletes. South African J Sports Med. 2001;8(2):37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Sweet TWFoster CMcGuigan MRBrice G. Quantitation of resistance training using the session rating of perceived exertion method. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(4):796802. PubMed ID: 15574104

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Tjelta LI. The training of international level distance runners. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2016;11(1):122134. doi:10.1177/1747954115624813

  • 26.

    McLaughlin JEHowley ETBassett DR JrThompson DLFitzhugh EC. Test of the classic model for predicting endurance running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(5):991997. PubMed ID: 19997010 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c0669d

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Greenlee TAGreene DRWard NJet al. Effectiveness of a 16-week high-intensity cardioresistance training program in adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(9):25282541. PubMed ID: 28820847 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001976

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Berryman NMujika IArvisais DRoubeix MBinet CBosquet L. Strength training for middle- and long-distance performance: a meta-analysis. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(1):5763. PubMed ID: 28459360 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0032

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Saanijoki TNummenmaa LEskelinen JJet al. Affective responses to repeated sessions of high-intensity interval training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(12):26042611. PubMed ID: 26110694 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000721

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Carron AVWidmeyer WNBrawley LR. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the group environment questionnaire. J Sport Psychol. 1985;7(3):244266. doi:10.1123/jsp.7.3.244

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Carnes AJMahoney SE. Cohesion is associated with perceived exertion and enjoyment during group running. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2016;19(6):2439.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 207 207 91
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar