The Road to Rio: A Brief Report of Training-Load Distribution of Open-Water Swimmers During the Olympic Season

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Roberto Baldassarre
Search for other papers by Roberto Baldassarre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marco Bonifazi
Search for other papers by Marco Bonifazi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Romain Meeusen
Search for other papers by Romain Meeusen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Maria Francesca Piacentini
Search for other papers by Maria Francesca Piacentini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Purpose: The 10-km open-water swimming race is an endurance event that takes place in lakes, rivers, or sea and has been an Olympic event since 2008. The aim of the present brief report is to describe training volume and intensity distribution of elite open-water swimmers during the 2016 Olympic season, verifying if, in order to maximize performance, most of the training would be performed at low intensities. Methods: Eight elite Italian open-water swimmers (3 male and 5 female; 25 [2] y, 1.74 [0.05] m, 68.26 [8.17] kg) specialized in distances between 5 and 25 km participated in the study. Training load was determined using an online training diary. Training intensity was categorized according to the 3-zone model: Z1, light intensity; Z2, moderate intensity; and Z3, high intensity. Session rating of perceived exertion was used to quantify training-intensity distribution. This method assigns the entire session into a single intensity zone based on the rating of perceived exertion recorded 30 min posttraining. Results: Total yearly training volume was 3576.93 (272.390) km (3220.80–4041.97), distributed across 446 (37) (397–484) sessions monitored during the 2016 Olympic season. Training-intensity distribution in each zone was 76.83% (8.11%) in Z1, 17.70% (6.79%) in Z2, and 5.47% (5.93%) in Z3. Conclusions: High volumes in Z1 appear to be an important training method used by elite open-water swimmers. However, future research is necessary to study the effects of different training-intensity distribution on open-water swimming performances.

Baldassarre and Piacentini are with the Dept of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico,” Rome, Italy. Bonifazi is with the Dept of Medical, Surgical and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. Meeusen is with the Human Physiology Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Piacentini (mariafrancesca.piacentini@uniroma4.it) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Seiler S. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):276291. PubMed ID: 20861519 doi:10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Mujika I, Chatard JC, Busso T, Geyssant A, Barale F, Lacoste L. Effects of training on performance in competitive swimming. Can J Appl Physiol. 1995;20(4):395406. PubMed ID: 8563672 doi:10.1139/h95-031

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Baldassarre R, Bonifazi M, Zamparo P, Piacentini MF. Characteristics and challenges of open-water swimming performance: a review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(10):12751284. PubMed ID: 28459347 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0230

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Pyne DB, Sharp RL. Physical and energy requirements of competitive swimming events. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2014;24(4):351359. PubMed ID: 25029351 doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0047

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Zamparo P, Bonifazi M, Faina M, et al. Energy cost of swimming of elite long-distance swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94(5–6):697704. PubMed ID: 15887025 doi:10.1007/s00421-005-1337-0

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Piacentini MF, Meeusen R. An online training-monitoring system to prevent nonfunctional overreaching. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(4):524527. PubMed ID: 25310521 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0270

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Seiler KS, Kjerland . Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16(1):4956. PubMed ID: 16430681 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00418.x

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Wallace LK, Slattery KM, Coutts AJ. The ecological validity and application of the session-RPE method for quantifying training loads in swimming. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):3338. PubMed ID: 19002069 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874512

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Stellingwerf T. Case study: Nutrition and training periodization in three elite marathon runners. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2012;22(5):392400. PubMed ID: 23011657 doi:10.1123/ijsnem.22.5.392

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Psycharakis SG. A longitudinal analysis on the validity and reliability of ratings of perceived exertion for elite swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(2):420426. PubMed ID: 20351574 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bff58c

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Hydren JR, Cohen BS. Current scientific evidence for a polarized cardiovascular endurance training model. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(12):35233530. PubMed ID: 26595137 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001197

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Seiler S, Tønnessen E. Intervals, thresholds, and long slow distance: the role of intensity and duration in endurance training. Training. 2009;13(13):3253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    VanHeest JL, Mahoney CE, Herr L. Characteristics of elite open-water swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(2):302. PubMed ID: 15142018 doi:10.1519/R-13513.1

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Mujika I. Olympic preparation of a world-class female triathlete. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(4):727731. PubMed ID: 24088819 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0245

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Barroso R, Salgueiro DF, do Carmo EC, Nakamura FY. The effects of training volume and repetition distance on session rating of perceived exertion and internal load in swimmers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(7):848852. PubMed ID: 25671844 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0410

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Sylta O, Tønnessen E, Seiler S. From heart-rate data to training quantification: a comparison of 3 methods of training-intensity analysis. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(1):100107. PubMed ID: 24408353 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0298

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2840 1623 194
Full Text Views 57 10 0
PDF Downloads 58 18 0