We are updating our website on Thursday, December 2 from 9 AM – 5 PM EST. During this time, users may experience some disruptions while using the site. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Metabolic Cost of Paddling on Different Commercially Available Kayak Ergometers

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $114.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $152.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $217.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $289.00

Purpose: To compare the metabolic cost of paddling on different commercially available kayak ergometers using a standardized kayak incremental exercise protocol. Methods: Six male sprint kayak athletes undertook an incremental exercise protocol on 3 different kayak ergometers utilizing a randomized counterbalanced pair-matched design. Results: Mean maximal aerobic power on the WEBA ergometer (265 [14] W) was significantly higher than on the Dansprint (238 [9] W) and KayakPro® (247 [21] W, P < .01, effect size [ES] = 0.80). At the fifth stage, absolute oxygen consumption on the WEBA (3.82 [0.25] L·min−1) was significantly lower (P < 0.05, ES = 0.20) than KayakPro and Dansprint (4.10 [0.28] and 4.08 [0.27] L·min−1, respectively). Blood lactate concentration response at the sixth stage was significantly lower for the WEBA (3.5 [0.8] mmol·L−1), compared with KayakPro and Dansprint (5.4 [1.2] and 5.6 [1.5] mmol·L−1, P = .012, ES = 0.20). Stroke rate was significantly higher, without any effect of pacing during the submaximal stages for the Dansprint, compared with the WEBA (P < .001, ES = 0.28) and KayakPro (P < .001, ES = 0.38). A pacing effect was present at the maximal stage for all ergometers. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that paddling on different kayak ergometers when controlling power output elicits different metabolic and work outputs. It is recommended that scientists and coaches avoid testing on different ergometers and regularly calibrate these devices. Moreover, when an ergometer has been calibrated against a first principle device, it is necessary to consider calibration of various drag settings, due to their impact on stroke rate. Further research should explore the relationship between drag settings and stroke rate.

Oliveira Borges and Coutts are with the Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Oliveira Borges is also with the Australian Inst of Sport, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, and the School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Oliveira Borges, Bullock, Aitken, and Cox are with Paddle Australia, Sydney, Australia. Bullock and Cox are also with the Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.

Oliveira Borges (thiago.oliveiraborges@alumni.uts.edu.au) is corresponding author.
  • 1.

    Tanner R, Gore CJ. Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013.

  • 2.

    Oliveira Borges T, Bullock N, Aitken D, Coutts AJ. Accuracy and validity of commercially available kayak ergometers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(9):12671270. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0653

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Skorski S, Abbiss CR. The manipulation of pace within endurance sport. Front Physiol. 2017;8:102. PubMed ID: 28289392

  • 4.

    Bullock N, Woolford S, Peeling P, Bonetti D. Physiological protocols for the assessment of athletes in specific sports—sprint kayak athletes. In: Gore RTaCJ, ed. Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013:421433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Borg G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1998.

  • 6.

    Cooper HM, Hedges LV. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994.

  • 7.

    Hopkins WG. A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics. A New View of Statistics. 2002. http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html. Accessed 10 October, 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Lucia A, Juan AFS, Montilla M, et al. In professional road cyclists, low pedaling cadences are less efficient. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2004;36(6):10481054. PubMed ID: 15179176 doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000128249.10305.8A

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Leveque JM, Brisswalter J, Bernard O, Goubault C. Effect of paddling cadence on time to exhaustion and V ˙ O 2 kinetics at the intensity associated with VO2max in elite white-water kayakers. Can J Appl Physiol. 2002;27(2):602611. doi:10.1139/h02-035

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Konings MJ, Hettinga FJ. Pacing decision making in sport and the effects of interpersonal competition: a critical review. Sports Med. 2018;48(8):18291843. PubMed ID: 29799094 doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0937-x

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Astrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of Work Physiology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1986.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1111 844 85
Full Text Views 17 3 0
PDF Downloads 16 5 0