Differential Ratings of Perceived Match and Training Exertion in Girls’ Soccer

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Matthew D. Wright
Search for other papers by Matthew D. Wright in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Francisco Songane
Search for other papers by Francisco Songane in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stacey Emmonds
Search for other papers by Stacey Emmonds in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paul Chesterton
Search for other papers by Paul Chesterton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthew Weston
Search for other papers by Matthew Weston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Shaun J. Mclaren
Search for other papers by Shaun J. Mclaren in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Purpose: To understand the validity of differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE) as a measure of girls’ training and match internal loads. Methods: Using the centiMax scale (CR100), session dRPE for breathlessness (sRPE-B) and leg muscle exertion (sRPE-L) were collected across a season of training (soccer, resistance, and fitness) and matches from 33 players (15 [1] y). Differences and associations between dRPE were examined using mixed and general linear models. The authors’ minimal practical important difference was 8 arbitrary units (AU). Results: Mean (AU [SD] ∼16) sRPE-B and sRPE-L were 66 and 61 for matches, 51 and 49 for soccer, 86 and 67 for fitness, and 45 and 58 for resistance, respectively. Session RPE-B was rated most likely harder than sRPE-L for fitness (19 AU; 90% confidence limits: ±7) and most likely easier for resistance (−13; ±2). Match (5; ±4) and soccer (−3; ±2) differences were likely to most likely trivial. The within-player relationships between sRPE-B and sRPE-L were very likely moderate for matches (r = .44; 90% confidence limits: ±.12) and resistance training (.38; ±.06), likely large for fitness training (.51; ±.22), and most likely large for soccer training (.56; ±.03). Shared variance ranged from 14% to 35%. Conclusions: Practically meaningful differences between dRPE following physical training sessions coupled with low shared variance in all training types and matches suggest that sRPE-B and sRPE-L represent unique sensory inputs in girls’ soccer players. The data provide evidence for the face and construct validity of dRPE as a measure of internal load in this population.

Wright, Songane, and Weston are with the Dept of Exercise and Sport, Paramedic and Operational Departmental Practice, and Chesterton, the Dept of Physiotherapy, Sports Rehabilitation, Dietetics and Leadership, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom. Emmonds and Mclaren are with the Carnegie Applied Rugby Research Centre, Inst for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom. Mclaren is also with the England Performance Unit, Rugby Football League, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Wright (m.wright@tees.ac.uk) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Datson N, Drust B, Weston M, Gregson W. Repeated high-speed running in elite female soccer players during international competition. Sci Med Football. 2019;3(2):150156. doi:10.1080/24733938.2018.1508880

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Mujika I, Santisteban J, Impellizzeri FM, Castagna C. Fitness determinants of success in men’s and women’s football. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(2):107114. PubMed ID: 19058090 doi:10.1080/02640410802428071

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Coutts AJ. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(2):270273. PubMed ID: 30614348 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2018-0935

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Mclaren SJ, Macpherson TW, Coutts AJ, Hurst C, Spears IR, Weston M. The relationships between internal and external measures of training load and intensity in team sports: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2017;48(3):641658. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0830-z

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2010;20(11):873899. doi:10.1080/026404102320761787

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Scantlebury S, Till K, Atkinson G, Sawczuk T, Jones B. The within-participant correlation between s-RPE and heart rate in youth sport. Sports Med Int Open. 2017;1(6):E195E199. doi:10.1055/s-0043-118650

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Weston M. Difficulties in determining the dose-response nature of competitive soccer matches. J Athl Enhanc. 2013;2(1):15. doi:10.4172/2324-9080.1000e107

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Weston M, Siegler J, Bahnert A, McBrien J, Lovell R. The application of differential ratings of perceived exertion to Australian Football League matches. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(6):704708. PubMed ID: 25241705 doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.001

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Mclaren SJ. The Application of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion to Training Monitoring in Team Sports [doctoral thesis]. Middlesbrough, UK: Teesside University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Vanrenterghem J, Nedergaard NJ, Robinson MA, Drust B. Training load monitoring in team sports: a novel framework separating physiological and biomechanical load-adaptation pathways. Sports Med. 2017;47(11):21352142. PubMed ID: 28283992 doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0714-2

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Boisseau N, Delamarche P. Metabolic and hormonal responses to exercise in children and adolescents. Sports Med. 2000;30(6):405422. PubMed ID: 11132123 doi:10.2165/00007256-200030060-00003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Leceaga J, Los Arcos A, Castillo Alvira D, Yanci J. Influence of plyometric training volume on differentiated perceived exertion load of high level soccer players. Pensar Mov. 2017;15(2):e27664. doi:10.15517/pensarmov.v15i2.27664

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Los Arcos A, Yanci J, Mendiguchia J, Gorostiaga EM. Rating of muscular and respiratory perceived exertion in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(11):32803288. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000540

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Los Arcos A, Mendez-Villanueva A, Yanci J, Martínez-Santos R. Respiratory and muscular perceived exertion during official games in professional soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(3):301304. PubMed ID: 26217923 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0270

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Azcárate U, Yanci J, Arcos AL. Influence of match playing time and the length of the between-match microcycle in Spanish professional soccer players’ perceived training load. Sci Med Football. 2018;2(1):2328. doi:10.1080/24733938.2017.1386322

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Green JM, McIntosh JR, Hornsby J, Timme L, Gover L, Mayes JL. Effect of exercise duration on session RPE at an individualized constant workload. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;107(5):501507. PubMed ID: 19680680 doi:10.1007/s00421-009-1153-z

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Weaving D, Jones B, Marshall P, Till K, Abt G. Multiple measures are needed to quantify training Lloads in professional rugby league. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(10):735740. PubMed ID: 28783849 doi:10.1055/s-0043-114007

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Groslambert A, Mahon AD. Perceived exertion. Sports Med. 2006;36(11):911928. PubMed ID: 17052130 doi:10.2165/00007256-200636110-00001

  • 19.

    Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones ADG, Bailey DA, Beunen GP. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(4):689694. PubMed ID: 11932580

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Wright MD, Laas M-M. Strength training and metabolic conditioning for female youth and adolescent soccer players. Strength Cond J. 2016;38(2):96104. doi:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000212

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Mclaren SJ, Smith A, Spears IR, Weston M. A detailed quantification of differential ratings of perceived exertion during team-sport training. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(3):290295. PubMed ID: 27451269 doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: part 1—correlation within subjects. Br Med J. 1995;310(6977):446. doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6977.446

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Hopkins WG. A Spreadsheet for deriving a confidence interval, mechanistic inference and clinical inference from a p value. Sportscience. 2007;11:1620. sportsci.org/2007/wghinf.htm. Accessed September 5, 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Hopkins W. Magnitude-based decisions. Sportscience. 2019;23:iiii. sportsci.org/2019/inbrief.htm. Accessed July 9, 2019.

  • 25.

    Kyprianou E, Lolli L, Haddad Al H, et al. A novel approach to assessing validity in sports performance research: integrating expert practitioner opinion into the statistical analysis. Sci Med Football. 2019;3(4):333338. doi:10.1080/24733938.2019.1617433

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Davidson M. Known-groups validity. In: Michalos AC, ed. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2014:34813482. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1581

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Folland JP, Williams AG. The adaptations to strength training. Sports Med. 2007;37(2):145168. PubMed ID: 17241104

  • 28.

    Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Hormonal responses and adaptations to resistance exercise and training. Sports Med. 2005;35(4):339361. PubMed ID: 15831061 doi:10.2165/00007256-200535040-00004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Wright MD, Hurst C, Taylor JM. Contrasting effects of a mixed-methods high-intensity interval training intervention in girl football players. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(19):18081815. PubMed ID: 26881963 doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1139163

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Mclaren SJ, Graham M, Spears IR, Weston M. The sensitivity of differential ratings of perceived exertion as measures of internal load. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(3):404406. PubMed ID: 26218099 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0223

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Sports Med. 2013;43(5):313338. PubMed ID: 23539308 doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Chia M. Power recovery in the Wingate anaerobic test in girls and women following prior sprints of a short duration. Biol Sport. 2001;18(1):4553.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Wright MD, Innerd A. Application and interpretation of the yo-yo intermittent recovery test to the long-term physical development of girls association football players. Sci Med Football. 2019;3(4):297306. doi:10.1080/24733938.2019.1609071

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Cook J, Hislop J, Adewuyi T, et al. Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(28):1175. doi:10.3310/hta18280

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3009 1256 40
Full Text Views 64 30 4
PDF Downloads 59 27 3