Effect of Biological Maturation on Performance of the Athletic Ability Assessment in Australian Rules Football Players

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Daniel K. Rogers
Search for other papers by Daniel K. Rogers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ian McKeown
Search for other papers by Ian McKeown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gaynor Parfitt
Search for other papers by Gaynor Parfitt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Darren Burgess
Search for other papers by Darren Burgess in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Roger G. Eston
Search for other papers by Roger G. Eston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Purpose: To determine the effect of biological maturation on athletic movement competency as measured using the Athletic Ability Assessment-6. Methods: Fifty-two junior Australian Rules football players were split into 3 groups based on proximity to peak height velocity, while 46 senior players were split into 2 groups based on playing status. The subjects completed the Athletic Ability Assessment-6 (inclusive of the overhead squat, double lunge, single-leg Romanian dead lift, push-up, and chin-up). All subjects were filmed and retrospectively assessed by a single rater. A 1-way analysis of variance and effect-size statistics (Cohen d) with corresponding 90% confidence intervals were used to describe between-groups differences in the component movement scores. The statistical significance was set a priori at P < .05. Results: There were significant between-groups differences for all component movements (P < .05). Post hoc testing revealed that older, more mature subjects possessed greater competency in all movements except the overhead squat. The effect sizes revealed predominantly moderate to very large differences in competency between the senior and junior groups (range of d [90% confidence interval]: 0.70 [0.06 to 1.30] to 3.01 [2.18 to 3.72]), with unclear to moderate differences found when comparing the 3 junior groups (0.08 [−0.50 to 0.65] to 0.97 [0.22–1.61]). Conclusions: The findings suggest that biological maturation may be associated with changes in athletic movement competency in youth Australian Rules football players. Therefore, it is recommended that strength and conditioning coaches monitor maturity status when working with 12- to 15-y-old players. This can allow for a comparison of an individual’s athletic movement competency to maturity-based standards and help guide developmentally appropriate training programs.

Rogers, Parfitt, Burgess, and Eston are with the Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Rogers and McKeown are with the Port Adelaide Football Club, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Burgess is also with the Melbourne Football Club, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Rogers (rogdk001@mymail.unisa.edu.au) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Lloyd RS, Oliver JL. The youth physical development model: a new approach to long-term athletic development. Strength Cond J. 2012;34:6172. doi:10.1519/SSC.0b013e31825760ea

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Lundgren LE, Tran TT, Farley ORL, et al. Athletic movement competency is related to general athletic performance variables and surfing performance. J Aust Strength Cond. 2014;22:8083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Darrall-Jones JD, Jones B, Till K. Anthropometric and physical profiles of English academy rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:20862096. PubMed ID: 25647656 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000872

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Gaudion SL, Doma K, Sinclair W, Banyard HG, Woods CT. Identifying the physical fitness, anthropometric and athletic movement qualities discriminant of developmental level in elite junior Australian football: implications for the development of talent. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31:18301839. PubMed ID: 27787473 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001682

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Woods CT, Raynor AJ, Bruce L, McDonald Z, Collier N. Predicting playing status in junior Australian Football using physical and anthropometric parameters. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18:225229. PubMed ID: 24613146 doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2014.02.006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Woods CT, McKeown I, Haff GG, Robertson S. Comparison of athletic movement between elite junior and senior Australian football players. J Sports Sci. 2015;34:12601265. PubMed ID: 26525174 doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1107185

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Lloyd RS, Oliver JL, Radnor JM, Rhodes BC, Faigenbaum AD, Myer GD. Relationships between functional movement screen scores, maturation and physical performance in young soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2014;33:1119. PubMed ID: 24857046 doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.918642

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Baxter-Jones ADG, Eisenamann JC, Sherar LB. Controlling for maturation in pediatric exercise science. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2005;17:1830. doi:10.1123/pes.17.1.18

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Philippaerts RM, Vaeyens R, Janssens M, et al. The relationship between peak height velocity and physical performance in youth soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2006;24:221230. PubMed ID: 16368632 doi:10.1080/02640410500189371

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function—part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1:6272. PubMed ID: 21522216

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Portas MD, Parkin G, Roberts J, Batterham AM. Maturational effect on Functional Movement Screen score in adolescent soccer players. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:854858. PubMed ID: 27138939 doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.001

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Frost DM, Beach TAC, Campbell TL, Callaghan JP, McGill SM. An appraisal of the Functional Movement Screen grading criteria—is the composite score sensitive to risky movement behavior. Phys Ther Sport. 2015;16:324330. PubMed ID: 26106038 doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.02.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Frost DM, Beach TAC, Callaghan JP, McGill SM. Using the Functional Movement Screen to evaluate the effectiveness of training. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:16201630. PubMed ID: 21921825 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234ec59

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Hartigan EH, Lawrence M, Bisson BM. Relationship of the functional movement screen in-line lunge to power, speed, and balance measures. Sports Health. 2014;6:197202. PubMed ID: 24790688 doi:10.1177/1941738114522412

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones ADG, Bailey DA, Beunen GP. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:689694. PubMed ID: 11932580

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Rogers DK, McKeown I, Parfitt G, Burgess D, Eston RG. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the athletic ability assessment in sub-elite Australian rules football players. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33:125138. PubMed ID: 28777248 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002175

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Hinkin TR. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ Res Methods. 1998;1:104121. doi:10.1177/109442819800100106

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Bennett H, Arnold J, Martin M, Norton K, Davison K. A randomised controlled trial of movement quality-focused exercise versus traditional resistance exercise for improving movement quality and physical performance in trained adults. J Sports Sci. 2019;37:28062817. PubMed ID: 31500505 doi:10.1080/02640414.2019.1665234

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring. 2019. Effect size calculator. https://www.cem.org/effect-size-calculator. Accessed April 30, 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:313. PubMed ID: 19092709 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Ireton MRE, Till K, Weaving D, Jones B. Differences in movement skills and physical qualities of elite senior and academy rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33:13281338. PubMed ID: 28934100 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Carron AV, Bailey DA. Strength development in boys from 10 through 16 years. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1974;39:137. PubMed ID: 4377166 doi:10.2307/1165931

  • 23.

    Pichardo AW, Oliver JL, Harrison CB, Maulder PS, Lloyd RS, Kandoi R. The influence of maturity offset, strength and movement competency on motor skill performance in adolescent males. Sports. 2019;7:168. doi:10.3390/sports7070168

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Ryan D, McCall A, Fitzpatrick G, Hennessy L, Meyer T, McCunn R. The influence of maturity status on movement quality among English Premier League academy soccer players. Sport Perf Sci Rep. 2018;32:13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    McKay MJ, Baldwin JN, Ferreira P, Simic M, Vanicek N, Burns J. Normative reference values for strength and flexibility of 1,000 children and adults. Neurology. 2017;88:3643. PubMed ID: 27881628 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003466

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Lefevre J, Beunen G, Steens G, Claessens A, Renson R. Motor performance during adolescence and age thirty as related to age at peak height velocity. Ann Hum Biol. 1990;17:423435. PubMed ID: 2260844 doi:10.1080/03014469000001202

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Kazman JB, Galecki JM, Lisman P, Deuster PA, O’Connor FG. Factor structure of the functional movement screen in marine officer candidates. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:672678. PubMed ID: 23924891 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a6dd83

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Lubans DR, Smith JJ, Harries SK, Barnett LM, Faigenbaum AD. Development, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the resistance training skills battery. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:13731380. PubMed ID: 24755868 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b5527

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Malina RM, Koziel SM. Validation of maturity offset in a longitudinal sample of polish boys. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:424437. PubMed ID: 24016098 doi:10.1080/02640414.2013.828850

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Frost DM, Beach TAC, Callaghan JP, McGill SM. FMS scores change with performers’ knowledge of the grading criteria—are general whole-body movement screens capturing ‘dysfunction’? J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:30373044. PubMed ID: 26502271 doi:10.1097/JSC.0000000000000211

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2530 992 53
Full Text Views 56 7 0
PDF Downloads 52 13 0