Aerobic and Anaerobic Power Distribution During Cross-Country Mountain Bike Racing

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Bernhard Prinz
Search for other papers by Bernhard Prinz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
Dieter Simon
Search for other papers by Dieter Simon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
Harald Tschan
Search for other papers by Harald Tschan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
, and
Alfred Nimmerichter
Search for other papers by Alfred Nimmerichter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0758
Keywords:
off-road cyclists; high-intensity cycling; competition; race performance
First Published Online:
12 Apr 2021
In Print:
Volume 16: Issue 11
Page Range:
1610–1615
Restricted access

Purpose: To determine aerobic and anaerobic demands of mountain bike cross-country racing. Methods: Twelve elite cyclists (7 males; V˙O2max = 73.8 [2.6] mL·min-1·kg−1, maximal aerobic power [MAP] = 370 [26] W, 5.7 [0.4] W·kg−1, and 5 females; V˙O2max = 67.3 [2.9] mL·min−1·kg−1, MAP = 261 [17] W, 5.0 [0.1] W·kg−1) participated over 4 seasons at several (119) international and national races and performed laboratory tests regularly to assess their aerobic and anaerobic performance. Power output, heart rate, and cadence were recorded throughout the races. Results: The mean race time was 79 (12) minutes performed at a mean power output of 3.8 (0.4) W·kg−1; 70% (7%) MAP (3.9 [0.4] W·kg−1 and 3.6 [0.4] W·kg−1 for males and females, respectively) with a cadence of 64 (5) rev·min−1 (including nonpedaling periods). Time spent in intensity zones 1 to 4 (below MAP) were 28% (4%), 18% (8%), 12% (2%), and 13% (3%), respectively; 30% (9%) was spent in zone 5 (above MAP). The number of efforts above MAP was 334 (84), which had a mean duration of 4.3 (1.1) seconds, separated by 10.9 (3) seconds with a mean power output of 7.3 (0.6) W·kg−1 (135% [9%] MAP). Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of the anaerobic energy system and the interaction between anaerobic and aerobic energy systems. Therefore, the ability to perform numerous efforts above MAP and a high aerobic capacity are essential to be competitive in mountain bike cross-country.

Prinz, Simon, and Nimmerichter are with the Training and Sports Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. Prinz and Tschan are with the Centre for Sport Science and University Sports, University of Vienna, Austria.

Nimmerichter (alfred.nimmerichter@fhwn.ac.at) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Cover International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
  • 1.

    Impellizzeri F, Sassi A, Rodriguez-Alonso M, Mognoni P, Marcora S. Exercise intensity during off-road cycling competitions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(11):1808–1813. PubMed ID: 12439087 doi:10.1097/00005768-200211000-00018

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Rampinini E, Mognoni P, Sassi A. Correlations between physiological variables and performance in high level cross country off road cyclists. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(10):747–751. PubMed ID: 16183772 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.017236

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Stapelfeldt B, Schwirtz A, Schumacher YO, Hillebrecht M. Workload demands in mountain bike racing. Int J Sports Med. 2004;25(4):294–300. PubMed ID: 15162249 doi:10.1055/s-2004-819937

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Gregory J, Johns DP, Walls JT. Relative vs. absolute physiological measures as predictors of mountain bike cross-country race performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(1):17–22. PubMed ID: 17313256 doi:10.1519/00124278-200702000-00004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Union Cyclist Internationale (UCI). Part 4 Mountain Bike Union cycliste internationale cycling regulations. 2020. https://www.uci.org/inside-uci/constitutions-regulations/regulations. Accessed January 23, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Hays A, Devys S, Bertin D, Marquet LA, Brisswalter J. Understanding the physiological requirements of the mountain bike cross-country Olympic race format. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1062. PubMed ID: 30158873 doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01062

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Macdermid PW, Stannard S. Mechanical work and physiological responses to simulated cross country mountain bike racing. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(14):1491–1501. PubMed ID: 22876780 doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.711487

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Granier C, Abbiss CR, Aubry A, et al. Power output and pacing during international cross-country mountain bike cycling. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(9):1243–1249. PubMed ID: 29688109 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0516

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM. The physiology of mountain biking. Sports Med. 2007;37(1):59–71. PubMed ID: 17190536 doi:10.2165/00007256-200737010-00005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Kuipers H, Verstappen FT, Keizer HA, Geurten P, van Kranenburg G. Variability of aerobic performance in the laboratory and its physiologic correlates. Int J Sports Med. 1985;6(4):197–201. PubMed ID: 4044103 doi:10.1055/s-2008-1025839

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Lehmann M, Berg A, Kapp R, Wessinghage T, Keul J. Correlations between laboratory testing and distance running performance in marathoners of similar performance ability. Int J Sports Med. 1983;4(4):226–230. PubMed ID: 6654546 doi:10.1055/s-2008-1026039

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Berg A, Jakob E, Lehmann M, Dickhuth HH, Huber G, Keul J. Current aspects of modern ergometry. Pneumologie. 1990;44(1):2–13. PubMed ID: 2408033

  • 13.

    Gardner AS, Stephens S, Martin DT, Lawton E, Lee H, Jenkins D. Accuracy of SRM and power tap power monitoring systems for bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(7):1252–1258. PubMed ID: 15235334 doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000132380.21785.03

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Maier T, Schmid L, Muller B, Steiner T, Wehrlin JP. Accuracy of cycling power meters against a mathematical model of treadmill cycling. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(6):456–461. PubMed ID: 28482367 doi:10.1055/s-0043-102945

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Wooles AL, Robinson AJ, Keen PS. A static method for obtaining a calibration factor for SRM bicycle power cranks. Sports Eng. 2005;8(3):137–144. doi:10.1007/BF02844014

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Costa VP, de Oliveira FR. Physiological variables to predict performance in cross-country mountain bike. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2008;11(6):14–24.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Fornasiero A, Savoldelli A, Modena R, Boccia G, Pellegrini B, Schena F. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of top-level youth cross-country cyclists. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(8):901–906. PubMed ID: 28671853 doi:10.1080/02640414.2017.1346271

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Inoue A, Sa Filho AS, Mello FC, Santos TM. Relationship between anaerobic cycling tests and mountain bike cross-country performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(6):1589–1593. PubMed ID: 21912290 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234eb89

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Abbiss CR, Ross ML, Garvican LA, et al. The distribution of pace adopted by cyclists during a cross-country mountain bike World Championships. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(7):787–794. PubMed ID: 23521618 doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.751118

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications. Sports Med. 2013;43(10):927–954. PubMed ID: 23832851 doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0066-5

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med. 2013;43(5):313–338. PubMed ID: 23539308 doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Ronnestad BR, Hansen EA, Raastad T. Effect of heavy strength training on thigh muscle cross-sectional area, performance determinants, and performance in well-trained cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(5):965–975. PubMed ID: 19960350

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 5065 3234 62
Full Text Views 72 35 5
PDF Downloads 110 61 9