Comparing Weekly Training and Game Demands According to Playing Position in a Semiprofessional Basketball Team

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Markus N.C. Williams
Search for other papers by Markus N.C. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Vincent J. Dalbo
Search for other papers by Vincent J. Dalbo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jordan L. Fox
Search for other papers by Jordan L. Fox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Cody J. O’Grady
Search for other papers by Cody J. O’Grady in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Aaron T. Scanlan
Search for other papers by Aaron T. Scanlan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Purpose: To compare weekly training and game demands according to playing position in basketball players. Methods: A longitudinal, observational study was adopted. Semiprofessional, male basketball players categorized as backcourt (guards; n = 4) and frontcourt players (forwards/centers; n = 4) had their weekly workloads monitored across an entire season. External workload was determined using microsensors and included PlayerLoad (PL) and inertial movement analysis variables. Internal workload was determined using heart rate to calculate absolute and relative summated-heart-rate-zones workload and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) to calculate session-RPE workload. Comparisons between weekly training and game demands were made using linear mixed models and effect sizes in each positional group. Results: In backcourt players, higher relative PL (P = .04, very large) and relative summated-heart-rate-zones workload (P = .007, very large) were evident during training, while greater session-RPE workload (P = .001, very large) was apparent during games. In frontcourt players, greater PL (P < .001, very large), relative PL (P = .019, very large), peak PL intensities (P < .001, moderate), high-intensity inertial movement analysis events (P = .002, very large), total inertial movement analysis events (P < .001, very large), summated-heart-rate-zones workload (P < .001, very large), RPE (P < .001, very large), and session-RPE workload (P < .001, very large) were evident during games. Conclusions: Backcourt players experienced similar demands between training and games across several variables, with higher average workload intensities during training. Frontcourt players experienced greater demands across all variables during games than training. These findings emphasize the need for position-specific preparation strategies leading into games in basketball teams.

Williams is with the Dept. of Sports Performance, United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee, Lake Placid, NY, USA. Dalbo, Fox, O’Grady, and Scanlan are with the Human Exercise and Training Laboratory, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.

Scanlan (a.scanlan@cqu.edu.au) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Fox J, Scanlan A, Stanton R. A review of player monitoring approaches in basketball: current trends and future directions. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(7):20212029. PubMed ID: 28445227 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001964

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    O’Grady C, Fox J, Dalbo V, Scanlan A. A systematic review of the external and internal workloads experienced during games-based drills in basketball players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020;15(5):603616. PubMed ID: 32294618 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2019-0785

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Portes R, Navarro RM, Sosa C, Trapero JJ, Jiménez SL. Monitoring and interpreting external load in basketball: a narrative review. Rev Psicol Deporte. 2019;28(3):119131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Stojanović E, Stojiljković N, Scanlan A, Dalbo V, Berkelmans D, Milanović Z. The activity demands and physiological responses encountered during basketball match-play: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(1):111135. PubMed ID: 29039018 doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0794-z

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Bourdon P, Cardinale M, Murray A, et al. Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(suppl 2):S2-161S2-170. doi:10.1123/IJSPP.2017-0208

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Fox J, Stanton R, Scanlan A. A comparison of training and competition demands in semiprofessional male basketball players. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018;89(1):103111. PubMed ID: 29334021 doi:10.1080/02701367.2017.1410693

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    García F, Vázquez-Guerrero J, Castellano J, Casals M, Schelling X. Differences in physical demands between game quarters and playing positions in professional basketball players during official competition. J Sports Sci Med. 2020;19(2):256263. PubMed ID: 32390718

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Reina Román M, García-Rubio J, Feu S, Ibáñez S. Training and competition load monitoring and analysis of women’s amateur basketball by playing position: approach study. Front Psychol. 2019;9:2689. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02689

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Svilar L, Castellano J, Jukic I. Comparison of 5vs5 training games and match-play using microsensor technology in elite basketball. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(7):18971903. PubMed ID: 30204654 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002826

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Trapero J, Sosa Marín C, Zhang S, et al. Comparison of the movement characteristics based on position-specific between semi-elite and elite basketball players. Rev Psicol Deporte. 2019;28(3):140145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Scanlan A, Tucker P, Dalbo V. A comparison of linear speed, closed-skill agility, and open-skill agility qualities between backcourt and frontcourt adult semiprofessional male basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(5):13191327. PubMed ID: 24149765 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000276

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Pion J, Segers V, Stautemas J, Boone J, Lenoir M, Bourgois J. Position-specific performance profiles, using predictive classification models in senior basketball. Int J Sports Sci Coa. 2018;13(6):10721080. doi:10.1177/1747954118765054

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Zhang S, Lorenzo A, Gómez M-A, Liu H, Gonçalves B, Sampaio J. Players’ technical and physical performance profiles and game-to-game variation in NBA. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2017;17(4):466483. doi:10.1080/24748668.2017.1352432

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Scanlan A, Dascombe B, Reaburn P. A comparison of the activity demands of elite and sub-elite Australian men’s basketball competition. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(11):11531160. PubMed ID: 21777151 doi:10.1080/02640414.2011.582509

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Svilar L, Castellano J, Jukic I, Casamichana D. Positional differences in elite basketball: selecting appropriate training-load measures. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(7):947952. PubMed ID: 29345556 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0534

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Vázquez-Guerrero J, Suarez-Arrones L, Gómez D, Rodas G. Comparing external total load, acceleration and deceleration outputs in elite basketball players across positions during match play. Kinesiology. 2018;50(2):228234. doi:10.26582/k.50.2.11

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Torres-Ronda L, Ric A, Llabres-Torres I, de las Heras B, del Alcazar X. Position-dependent cardiovascular response and time-motion analysis during training drills and friendly matches in elite male basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(1):6070. PubMed ID: 26284807 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001043

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Foster C, Florhaug J, Franklin J, et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):109115. PubMed ID: 11708692 doi:10.1519/00124278-200102000-00019

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Fox J, O’Grady C, Scanlan A. Game schedule congestion affects weekly workloads but not individual game demands in semi-professional basketball. Biol Sport. 2020;37(1):5967. PubMed ID: 32205911 doi:10.5114/biolsport.2020.91499

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Montgomery P, Pyne D, Minahan C. The physical and physiological demands of basketball training and competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(1):7586. PubMed ID: 20308698 doi:10.1123/ijspp.5.1.75

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Fox J, Conte D, Stanton R, McLean B, Scanlan A. The application of accelerometer-derived moving averages to quantify peak demands in basketball: a comparison of sample duration, playing role, and session type [published online ahead of print February 14, 2020]. J Strength Cond Res. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003486

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Barrett S, Midgley A, Lovell R. PlayerLoad: reliability, convergent validity, and influence of unit position during treadmill running. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(6):945952. PubMed ID: 24622625 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0418

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Luteberget L, Holme B, Spencer M. Reliability of wearable inertial measurement units to measure physical activity in team handball. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(4):467473. PubMed ID: 28872371 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0036

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Scanlan A, Fox J, Poole J, et al. A comparison of traditional and modified summated-heart-rate-zones models to measure internal training load in basketball players. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2018;22(4):303309. doi:10.1080/1091367X.2018.1445089

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Berkelmans D, Dalbo V, Fox J, et al. Influence of different methods to determine maximum heart rate on training load outcomes in basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(11):31773185. PubMed ID: 30540282 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002291

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):313. PubMed ID: 19092709 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Coote J. Recovery of heart rate following intense dynamic exercise. Exp Physiol. 2010;95(3):431440. PubMed ID: 19837772 doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2009.047548

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    van de Pol P, Kavussanu M, Ring C. Goal orientations, perceived motivational climate, and motivational outcomes in football: a comparison between training and competition contexts. Pysch Sport Exerc. 2012;13(4):491499. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.002

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Scanlan A, Wen N, Tucker P, Dalbo V. The relationships between internal and external training load models during basketball training. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(9):23972405. PubMed ID: 24662233 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000458

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Cerin E, Szabo A, Hunt N, Williams C. Temporal patterning of competitive emotions: a critical review. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(8):605626. PubMed ID: 10972411 doi:10.1080/02640410050082314

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2274 1148 40
Full Text Views 46 15 0
PDF Downloads 53 20 0