Monitoring the Heart Rate Variability Responses to Training Loads in Competitive Swimmers Using a Smartphone Application and the Banister Impulse-Response Model
Click name to view affiliation
Search for other papers by Eva Piatrikova in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicholas J. Willsmer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco Altini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mladen Jovanović in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lachlan J.G. Mitchell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Javier T. Gonzalez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ana C. Sousa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sean Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose: First, to examine whether heart rate variability (HRV) responses can be modeled effectively via the Banister impulse-response model when the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) alone, and in combination with subjective well-being measures, are utilized. Second, to describe seasonal HRV responses and their associations with changes in critical speed (CS) in competitive swimmers. Methods: A total of 10 highly trained swimmers collected daily 1-minute HRV recordings, sRPE training load, and subjective well-being scores via a novel smartphone application for 15 weeks. The impulse-response model was used to describe chronic root mean square of the successive differences (rMSSD) responses to training, with sRPE and subjective well-being measures used as systems inputs. Changes in CS were obtained from a 3-minute all-out test completed in weeks 1 and 14. Results: The level of agreement between predicted and actual HRV data was R2 = .66 (.25) when sRPE alone was used. Model fits improved in the range of 4% to 21% when different subjective well-being measures were combined with sRPE, representing trivial-to-moderate improvements. There were no significant differences in weekly group averages of log-transformed (Ln) rMSSD (P = .34) or HRV coefficient of variation of Ln rMSSD (P = .12); however, small-to-large changes (d = 0.21–1.46) were observed in these parameters throughout the season. Large correlations were observed between seasonal changes in HRV measures and CS (changes in averages of Ln rMSSD: r = .51, P = .13; changes in coefficient of variation of Ln rMSSD: r = −.68, P = .03). Conclusion: The impulse-response model and data collected via a novel smartphone application can be used to model HRV responses to swimming training and nontraining-related stressors. Large relationships between seasonal changes in measured HRV parameters and CS provide further evidence for incorporating a HRV-guided training approach.
Piatrikova, Willsmer, Gonzalez, and Williams are with the Dept for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom. Altini is with the A.S.M.A. B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Jovanović is with the Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. Mitchell is with the Queensland Academy of Sport, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Sousa is with the Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; and Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, University Inst of Maia, ISMAI, Maia, Portugal.
© 2024 Human Kinetics