One Long Versus 2 Short Sessions? Physiological and Perceptual Responses to Low-Intensity Training at Self-Selected Speeds in Cross-Country Skiers

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Rune Kjøsen TalsnesMeråker High School, Trøndelag County Council, Steinkjer, Norway
Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Bodø, Norway

Search for other papers by Rune Kjøsen Talsnes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Sigrid NordgårdenDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Bodø, Norway

Search for other papers by Sigrid Nordgården in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jan KocbachDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Center for Elite Sports Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Search for other papers by Jan Kocbach in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Guro Strøm SolliDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Center for Elite Sports Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Search for other papers by Guro Strøm Solli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Purpose: To compare self-selected speeds and corresponding physiological responses and perceived training stress between 1 long session versus 2 shorter sessions of low-intensity training (LIT) in 1 day among cross-country skiers. Methods: Thirteen national-level skiers performed 2 different LIT types during classical roller-skiing matched for the same distance in a counterbalanced order. The training consisted of either 1 long (approximately 3 h) session (1LIT) or 2 shorter (approximately 1.5 h each) sessions (2LIT) with 7 hours of recovery in between. Speed, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion, and blood lactate concentrations were measured, and perceived training stress (1–10) was assessed after sessions. Results: 2LIT was performed at mean (SD) 1.9% (2.0%) higher speeds versus 1LIT (P ≤ .01). Higher speeds were also found in the second versus first session of 2LIT and the second versus first part of 1LIT (1.9% [3.2%] and 3.2% [3.6%], respectively, both P ≤ .01). There were no significant differences between LIT types in heart rate, although rating of perceived exertion increased in the second versus first part of 1LIT (0.9 [0.8] point, P ≤ .01). Blood lactate concentration was reduced in the second versus first session/part of both LIT types (approximately 0.16 [0.20] mmol·L−1, P ≤ .05). There were no differences in perceived training stress between LIT types 7 and 23 hours after training, although higher perceived muscular exertion (2.0 [1.1] points, P ≤ .01) was found directly after 1LIT. Conclusions: Compared with a distance-matched long session, skiers perform 2LIT at slightly higher self-selected speeds with the same physiological responses elicited, although minor differences in perceived training stress were observed.

Talsnes (rune.k.talsnes@nord.no) is corresponding author.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 14 KB)
    • Supplementary Table S2 (PDF 20 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Losnegard T. Energy system contribution during competitive cross-country skiing. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119(8):16751690. PubMed ID: 31076890 doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04158-x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC. A reappraisal of success factors for Olympic cross-country skiing. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(1):117121. PubMed ID: 24088346 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0373

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC. Physiological capacity and training routines of elite cross-country skiers: approaching the upper limits of human endurance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(8):10031011. PubMed ID: 28095083 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0749

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Sandbakk Ø, Hegge AM, Losnegard T, Skattebo O, Tonnessen E, Holmberg HC. The physiological capacity of the world’s highest ranked female cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(6):10911100. PubMed ID: 26741124 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000862

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC, Leirdal S, Ettema G. The physiology of world-class sprint skiers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):e9e16. PubMed ID: 20500558 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01117.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Solli GS, Tønnessen E, Sandbakk Ø. The training characteristics of the world’s most successful female cross-country skier. Front Physiol. 2017;8:Article 1069. PubMed ID: 29326603 doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.01069

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Tønnessen E, Sylta Ø, Haugen TA, Hem E, Svendsen IS, Seiler S. The road to gold: training and peaking characteristics in the year prior to a gold medal endurance performance. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):Article e101796. PubMed ID: 25019608 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101796

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Haugnes P, Kocbach J, Luchsinger H, Ettema G, Sandbakk Ø. The interval-based physiological and mechanical demands of cross-country ski training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(10):13711377. PubMed ID: 30958055 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2018-1007

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Seeberg TM, Kocbach J, Danielsen J, et al. Physiological and biomechanical responses to cross-country skiing in varying terrain: low- vs high-intensity. Front Physiol. 2021;12:Article 741573. PubMed ID: 34707511 doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.741573

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Solli GS, Kocbach J, Seeberg TM, et al. Sex-based differences in speed, sub-technique selection, and kinematic patterns during low- and high-intensity training for classical cross-country skiing. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207195. PubMed ID: 30440017 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207195

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Seiler S. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):276291. PubMed ID: 20861519 doi:10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Bartlett JD, Hawley JA, Morton JP. Carbohydrate availability and exercise training adaptation: too much of a good thing? Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(1):312. PubMed ID: 24942068 doi:10.1080/17461391.2014.920926

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Maunder E, Seiler S, Mildenhall MJ, Kilding AE, Plews DJ. The importance of “durability” in the physiological profiling of endurance athletes. Sports Med. 2021;51(8):16191628. doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01459-0

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES, et al. Defining training and performance caliber: a participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;17(2):317331. PubMed ID: 34965513 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Bolger CM, Kocbach J, Hegge AM, Sandbakk Ø. Speed and heart-rate profiles in skating and classical cross-country skiing competitions. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(7):873880. PubMed ID: 25671845 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0335

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2(2):9298. PubMed ID: 5523831

  • 17.

    Talsnes RK, Solli GS, Kocbach J, Torvik P, Sandbakk Ø. Laboratory- and field-based performance-predictions in cross-country skiing and roller-skiing. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256662. PubMed ID: 34428258 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256662

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Rodriguez NR, Di Marco NM, Langley S. American College of Sports Medicine position stand nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):709731. PubMed ID: 19225360 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31890eb86

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Gløersen Ø, Kocbach J, Gilgien M. Tracking performance in endurance racing sports: evaluation of the accuracy offered by three commercial GNSS receivers aimed at the sports market. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1425. PubMed ID: 30356794 doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01425

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:863. PubMed ID: 24324449 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Chtourou H, Souissi N. The effect of training at a specific time of day: a review. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(7):19842005. PubMed ID: 22531613 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825770a7

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Kilduff LP, Finn CV, Baker JS, Cook CJ, West DJ. Preconditioning strategies to enhance physical performance on the day of competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(6):677681. PubMed ID: 23689163 doi:10.1123/ijspp.8.6.677

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2377 2377 29
Full Text Views 61 61 0
PDF Downloads 79 79 0