Reliability of the 3-Component Model of Aerobic, Anaerobic Lactic, and Anaerobic Alactic Energy Distribution (PCr-LA-O2) for Energetic Profiling of Continuous and Intermittent Exercise
in International Journal of Sports Physiology and PerformanceClick name to view affiliation
Purpose: To assess the test–retest reliability of the continuous (PCr-LA-O2) and intermittent (PCr-LA-O2int) version of the 3-component model of energy distribution in an applied setting. Methods: Sixteen male handball players (age 23 [3] y, height 185 [7] cm, weight 85 [14] kg) completed the 30–15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30–15IFT) twice. Performance was assessed by peak speed (speed of the last successfully completed stage of the 30–15IFT [VIFT], in kilometers per hour) and time to exhaustion (in seconds). Oxygen uptake (in milliliters per kilogram per minute) and blood lactate concentrations (in millimoles per liter) were obtained before, during, and until 15 minutes after exercise. Total metabolic energy (in joules per kilogram), total metabolic power (in watts per kilogram), and energy shares (in joules per kilogram and percentage) of the aerobic (energy contribution of the aerobic system [WAERint]), anaerobic lactic, and anaerobic alactic (anaerobic alactic energy [WPCrint]) systems were calculated using both model versions, respectively. Results: Test–retest reliability was very good for VIFT (limits of agreement [LoA]: −1.13 to 0.63 km·h−1, coefficient of variation [CV%] 1.68), time to exhaustion (LoA: −101 to 38 s, CV% 2.92), peak oxygen uptake (LoA: −2.68 to 4.04 mL·min−1·kg−1, CV% 1.48), and peak heart rate (−6.9 to 7.7 beats·min−1, CV% 1.1), but moderate for change in blood lactate concentration (LoA: −3.84 to 4.07 mmol·L−1, CV% 11.43). Reliability of the modeled total energy and its fractions were high for total metabolic energy (LoA: −1489 to 1177 J·kg−1, CV% 2.88), total metabolic power (LoA: −2.0 to 1.9 W·kg−1, CV% 3.58), contribution of aerobic (LoA: −1673 to 1283 J·kg−1, CV% 3.62), WAERint (LoA: −1760 to 2160 J·kg−1, CV% 6.04), and moderate for anaerobic alactic (LoA: −368 to 439 J·kg−1, CV% 14.85), WPCrint (LoA: −1707 to 988 J·kg−1, CV% 9.98), and energy share of anaerobic lactic concentration (LoA: −229 to 235 J·kg−1, CV% 11.43). Conclusion: Considering the inherent fluctuations of the underlying energetics, the reliabilities of both versions of the 3-component model of energy distribution are acceptable for applied settings.
Kaufmann (sebastian.kaufmann@uni-wuerzburg.de) is corresponding author, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6148-5051
© 2023 Human Kinetics