Perspectives on Postmatch Fatigue From 300 Elite European Soccer Players

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Valter Di SalvoDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico,”Rome, Italy
Performance and Research Department, Italian Football Federation (FIGC), Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Valter Di Salvo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6756-3305*
,
Daniele BonannoJosoor Institute, Doha, Qatar

Search for other papers by Daniele Bonanno in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mattia ModonuttiPerformance and Research Department, Italian Football Federation (FIGC), Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Mattia Modonutti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrea ScanavinoPerformance and Research Department, Italian Football Federation (FIGC), Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Andrea Scanavino in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Claudio DonatelliPerformance and Research Department, Italian Football Federation (FIGC), Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Claudio Donatelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Fabio PigozziDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico,”Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Fabio Pigozzi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5808-9405
, and
Lorenzo LolliFootball Exchange, Research Institute of Sport Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Lorenzo Lolli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-3361
Restricted access

Purpose: To examine the general perspectives of elite soccer players on the time course of perceived postmatch fatigue and the influence of away matches on subjective perceptions. Methods: Adopting a cross-sectional study design, we invited 371 subjects from 14 top-division European clubs competing in the Belgian First Division A, English Premier League, French Ligue 1, Italian Serie A, Portuguese Primeira Liga, Russian Premier League, and Swiss Premier League to take part in a short survey on general issues relating to postmatch fatigue measurement and tracking in professional soccer. Results: Three hundred male professional soccer players completed the short questionnaire. For perceptions relevant to the time course of postmatch fatigue, two-thirds of respondents (67%) indicated higher postmatch fatigue perceived 2 days (48 h) after an official competition. Among these respondents, a higher proportion of answers was observed in wide midfielders (74%), attackers (74%), and central midfielders (68%). Approximately two-thirds of respondents (63%) indicated more than usual and much more than usual perceived postmatch fatigue following away matches. Conclusions: For the first time, our investigation addressed practical aspects that remained unexplored and fundamental to the definition of an optimal player management process following a competition. From a practical standpoint, perspectives of individual elite soccer players substantiated the notion of implementing processes with dedicated recovery protocols within 48 hours postmatch and highlighted the need for differential strategies addressing the additional burden of away matches and travel.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Bangsbo J, Mohr M, Krustrup P. Physical and metabolic demands of training and match-play in the elite football player. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(7):665674. PubMed ID: 16766496 doi:10.1080/02640410500482529

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Enoka RM, Duchateau J. Translating fatigue to human performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(11):22282238. PubMed ID: 27015386 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000929

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Nédélec M, McCall A, Carling C, Legall F, Berthoin S, Dupont G. Recovery in soccer: part I — Post-match fatigue and time course of recovery. Sports Med. 2012;42(12):9971015. PubMed ID: 23046224 doi:10.1007/BF03262308

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Micklewright D, St Clair Gibson A, Gladwell V, Al Salman A. Development and validity of the rating-of-fatigue scale. Sports Med. 2017;47(11):23752393. PubMed ID: 28283993 doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0711-5

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Thorpe RT, Atkinson G, Drust B, Gregson W. Monitoring fatigue status in elite team-sport athletes: implications for practice. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(suppl 1):S227S234. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0434

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Venter RE. Perceptions of team athletes on the importance of recovery modalities. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(suppl 1):S69S76. doi:10.1080/17461391.2011.643924

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Crowther F, Sealey R, Crowe M, Edwards A, Halson S. Team sport athletes’ perceptions and use of recovery strategies: a mixed-methods survey study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2017;9(1):6. PubMed ID: 28250934 doi:10.1186/s13102-017-0071-3

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Silva JR, Rumpf MC, Hertzog M, et al. Acute and residual soccer match-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48(3):539583. PubMed ID: 29098658 doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0798-8

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Carling C, Lacome M, McCall A, et al. Monitoring of post-match fatigue in professional soccer: welcome to the real world. Sports Med. 2018;48(12):26952702. PubMed ID: 29740792 doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0935-z

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Field A, Harper LD, Chrismas BCR, et al. The use of recovery strategies in professional soccer: a worldwide survey. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021;16(12):18041815. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2020-0799

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Brownstein CG, Dent JP, Parker P, et al. Etiology and recovery of neuromuscular fatigue following competitive soccer match-play. Front Physiol. 2017;8:831. PubMed ID: 29118716 doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00831.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Krustrup P, Ortenblad N, Nielsen J, et al. Maximal voluntary contraction force, SR function and glycogen resynthesis during the first 72 h after a high-level competitive soccer game. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(12):29872995. PubMed ID: 21448723 doi:10.1007/s00421-011-1919-y

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Rampinini E, Bosio A, Ferraresi I, Petruolo A, Morelli A, Sassi A. Match-related fatigue in soccer players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(11):21612170. PubMed ID: 21502891 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821e9c5c

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Schilling C, Dowsey MM, Clarke PM, Choong PF. Using patient-reported outcomes for economic evaluation: getting the timing right. Value Health. 2016;19(8):945950. PubMed ID: 27987644 doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.014

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Frost MH, Bonomi AE, Ferrans CE, Wong GY, Hays RD. Patient, clinician, and population perspectives on determining the clinical significance of quality-of-life scores. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(5):488494.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Nédélec M, Halson S, Abaidia AE, Ahmaidi S, Dupont G. Stress, sleep and recovery in elite soccer: a critical review of the literature. Sports Med. 2015;45(10):13871400. PubMed ID: 26206724 doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0358-z

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Jackson C. The chalder fatigue scale (CFQ 11). Occup Med. 2014;65(1):86. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqu168

  • 18.

    Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2009(3):Mr000008. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Amrhein V, Trafimow D, Greenland S. Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: there is no replication crisis if we don’t expect replication. Am Stat. 2019;73(suppl 1):262270. doi:10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat. 1998;52(2):119126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737745. PubMed ID: 20494804 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Di Salvo V, Gregson W, Atkinson G, Tordoff P, Drust B. Analysis of high intensity activity in Premier League soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2009;30(3):205212. PubMed ID: 19214939 doi:10.1055/s-0028-1105950

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Atkinson G, Williamson P, Batterham AM. Issues in the determination of ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’ in physiological research. Exp Physiol. 2019;104(8):12151225. PubMed ID: 31116468 doi:10.1113/EP087712

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Datson N, Lolli L, Drust B, Atkinson G, Weston M, Gregson W. Inter-methodological quantification of the target change for performance test outcomes relevant to elite female soccer players. Sci Med Footb. 2021;6(2):248261. doi:10.1080/24733938.2021.1942538

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Thorpe RT, Strudwick AJ, Buchheit M, Atkinson G, Drust B, Gregson W. Tracking morning fatigue status across in-season training weeks in elite soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(7):947952. PubMed ID: 26816390 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0490

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Malone S, Owen A, Newton M, et al. Wellbeing perception and the impact on external training output among elite soccer players. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(1):2934. PubMed ID: 28442275 doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.03.019

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Jeffries AC, Wallace L, Coutts AJ, McLaren SJ, McCall A, Impellizzeri FM. Athlete-reported outcome measures for monitoring training responses: a systematic review of risk of bias and measurement property quality according to the COSMIN guidelines. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020;15(9):12031215. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2020-0386

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Hemkens LG, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Ioannidis JPA. Routinely collected data and comparative effectiveness evidence: promises and limitations. CMAJ. 2016;188(8):E158E164. PubMed ID: 26883316 doi:10.1503/cmaj.150653

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Wolfe F. Fatigue assessments in rheumatoid arthritis: comparative performance of visual analog scales and longer fatigue questionnaires in 7760 patients. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(10):18961902. PubMed ID: 15468350

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Saw AE, Main LC, Gastin PB. Impact of sport context and support on the use of a self-report measure for athlete monitoring. J Sports Sci Med. 2015;14(4):732739. PubMed ID: 26664269

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1017 1017 35
Full Text Views 57 57 11
PDF Downloads 88 88 14