Effects of Caffeine on Repetitions to Failure and Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Training

Click name to view affiliation

J. Matt Green
Search for other papers by J. Matt Green in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Jason Wickwire
Search for other papers by P. Jason Wickwire in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John R. McLester
Search for other papers by John R. McLester in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Shawn Gendle
Search for other papers by Shawn Gendle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Geoffrey Hudson
Search for other papers by Geoffrey Hudson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert C. Pritchett
Search for other papers by Robert C. Pritchett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
C. Matt Laurent
Search for other papers by C. Matt Laurent in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Context:

Ergogenic effects of caffeine on aerobic or endurance exercise are well documented. Conversely, the ergogenic value of caffeine on high-intensity, primarily anaerobic performance is not well understood even though the proposed mechanisms of action for caffeine permit a strong theoretical basis for application to this type of exercise.

Purpose:

This study examined effects of caffeine (Ca) on number repetitions (reps), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and peak heart rate (PHR) during resistance-training exercise with reps performed to volitional failure.

Methods:

Subjects (N = 17) were tested for 10-rep maximum in bench press (BP) and leg press (LP). In sessions 2 and 3, Ca (~6 mg/kg) or placebo (Pl) was ingested 1 hr beforehand in a double-blind manner and counterbalanced order. Subjects performed 3 sets to failure (BP and LP) with reps, PHR, and RPE recorded each set. Repeated-measures ANOVAs, 2 (trial) × 3 (set), were used to analyze dependent measures with the Tukey honestly significant difference used when necessary as the post hoc test.

Results:

In BP, no significant differences (Ca vs Pl) were observed (reps, RPE, PHR). During set 3 of LP training, Ca was associated with significantly higher reps (12.5 ± 4.2 vs 9.9 ± 2.6) and PHR (158.5 ± 11.9 vs 151.8 ± 13.2). No signifcant RPE differences were found during LP.

Conclusions:

The findings of similar RPE concurrent with higher reps suggest that caffeine can blunt pain responses, possibly delaying fatigue in high-intensity resistance training. Ergogenic effects might be limited to the later sets in a resistance-training session. Further research is warranted regarding ergogenic effects of caffeine during resistance training and potential mechanisms of action.

Green, Gendle, Pritchett, and Laurent are with the Dept of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0312. Wickwire and McLester are with the Dept of Health, Physical Education and Sport Science, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144. Hudson is with the Dept of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798.

  • Collapse
  • Expand