Effects of Arms-Only Swimming Training on Performance, Movement Economy, and Aerobic Power

Click name to view affiliation

Maria Konstantaki
Search for other papers by Maria Konstantaki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Edward Winter
Search for other papers by Edward Winter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ian Swaine
Search for other papers by Ian Swaine in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Context:

Forward propulsion in freestyle swimming is predominantly achieved through arm action. Few studies have assessed the effects of arm training on arm power and swimming performance, yet there have not been any investigations on the effects of arms-only swimming training on swimming performance and physiological responses to arm exercise.

Purpose:

To investigate the changes in arms-only and full-stroke swimming performance, movement economy and aerobic power after an arms-only swimming training program.

Methods:

Fifteen male county level swimmers were assigned either to an experimental (ES, n = 8) or control group (CS, n = 7). For six weeks ES performed arms-only freestyle swimming exercises for 20% of their weekly training distance three times per week, whereas CS performed their usual swimming training. Before and after the training program, both groups performed a) two time trials, 186 m using arms-only (186ARMS) and 372 m using full-stroke (372FULL) freestyle swimming, and b) an incremental arm-pulling exercise test. The time to complete the trials was recorded. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), peak exercise intensity (EIpeak) submaximal oxygen uptake at 60 W (VO2−60) and exercise intensity at ventilatory threshold (VTW) were determined from the exercise test.

Results:

After training, ES had improved in 186ARMS (−14.2 ± 3.6%, P = .03), VO2−60 (−22.5 ± 2.3%, P = .04), EIpeak (+17.8 ± 4.2%, P = .03), and VTW (+18.9 ± 2.3%, P = .02), but not in VO2peak (P = .09) or in 372FULL (P = .07). None of the measures changed in CS (P > .05).

Conclusion:

Arms-only swimming training at 20% of the weekly training distance is an effective method to improve arm conditioning during the preparatory phase of the annual training cycle.

Konstantaki is with the School of Sport, Leisure, & Travel, Buckinghamshire New University, Wellesbourne Campus, Buckinghamshire, U.K.; Winter is with the Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Crescent Campus, Sheffield, Yorkshire, U.K.; and Swaine is with Sport Science, Canterbury Christ Church University. Canterbury, Kent, U.K.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2698 258 55
Full Text Views 43 8 0
PDF Downloads 44 4 0