A Comparison of Methods Used for Quantifying Internal Training Load in Women Soccer Players

Click name to view affiliation

Helen Alexiou
Search for other papers by Helen Alexiou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Aaron J. Coutts
Search for other papers by Aaron J. Coutts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to compare the session-RPE method for quantifying internal training load (TL) with various HR-based TL quantification methods in a variety of training modes with women soccer players.

Methods:

Fifteen elite women soccer players took part in the study (age: 19.3 ± 2.0 y and VO2max: 50.8 ± 2.7 mL·kg−1·min−1). Session-RPE, heart rate, and duration were recorded for 735 individual training sessions and matches over a period of 16 wk. Correlation analysis was used to compare session-RPE TLs with three commonly used HR-based methods for assessing TL.

Results:

The mean correlation for session-RPE TL with Banister’s TRIMP, LTzone TL and Edwards’s TL were (r = 0.84, 0.83, and 0.85, all P < .01, respectively). Correlations for session-RPE TL and three HR-based methods separated by session type were all significant (all P < .05). The strongest correlations were reported for technical (r = 0.68 to 0.82), conditioning (r = 0.60 to 0.79), and speed sessions (r = 0.61 to 0.79).

Conclusion:

The session-RPE TL showed a significant correlation with all training types common to soccer. Higher correlations were found with less intermittent, aerobic-based training sessions and suggest that HR-based TLs relate better to session-RPE TLs in less intermittent training activities. These results support previous findings showing that the session-RPE TL compares favorably with HR-based methods for quantifying internal TL in a variety of soccer training activities.

The authors are with the School of Leisure, Sport, and Tourism, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 8053 1078 109
Full Text Views 274 85 2
PDF Downloads 283 83 3