Monitoring Accelerations With GPS in Football: Time to Slow Down?

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Click name to view affiliation

Martin Buchheit
Search for other papers by Martin Buchheit in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hani Al Haddad
Search for other papers by Hani Al Haddad in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ben M. Simpson
Search for other papers by Ben M. Simpson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dino Palazzi
Search for other papers by Dino Palazzi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pitre C. Bourdon
Search for other papers by Pitre C. Bourdon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Valter Di Salvo
Search for other papers by Valter Di Salvo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alberto Mendez-Villanueva
Search for other papers by Alberto Mendez-Villanueva in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The aims of the current study were to examine the magnitude of between-GPS-models differences in commonly reported running-based measures in football, examine between-units variability, and assess the effect of software updates on these measures. Fifty identical-brand GPS units (15 SPI-proX and 35 SPIproX2, 15 Hz, GPSports, Canberra, Australia) were attached to a custom-made plastic sled towed by a player performing simulated match running activities. GPS data collected during training sessions over 4 wk from 4 professional football players (N = 53 files) were also analyzed before and after 2 manufacturersupplied software updates. There were substantial differences between the different models (eg, standardized difference for the number of acceleration >4 m/s2 = 2.1; 90% confidence limits [1.4, 2.7], with 100% chance of a true difference). Between-units variations ranged from 1% (maximal speed) to 56% (number of deceleration >4 m/s2). Some GPS units measured 2–6 times more acceleration/deceleration occurrences than others. Software updates did not substantially affect the distance covered at different speeds or peak speed reached, but 1 of the updates led to large and small decreases in the occurrence of accelerations (–1.24; –1.32, –1.15) and decelerations (–0.45; –0.48, –0.41), respectively. Practitioners are advised to apply care when comparing data collected with different models or units or when updating their software. The metrics of accelerations and decelerations show the most variability in GPS monitoring and must be interpreted cautiously.

Buchheit, Al Haddad, Simpson, Di Salvo, and Mendez-Villanueva are with the Football Performance and Science Dept, and Palazzi and Bourdon, the Sport Science Dept, ASPIRE Academy for Sports Excellence, Doha, Qatar. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Martin Buchheit. E-mail: martin.buchheit@aspire.qa, mb@martin-buchheit.net

  • Collapse
  • Expand