Is the Optimal Load for Maximal Power Output During Hang Power Cleans Submaximal?

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $107.00

1 year subscription

USD $142.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $203.00

2 year subscription

USD $265.00

Purpose: The optimal load for maximal power output during hang power cleans (HPCs) from a mechanical perspective is the 1-repetition-maximum (1RM) load; however, previous research has reported otherwise. The present study thus aimed to investigate the underlying factors that determine optimal load during HPCs. Methods: Eight competitive Olympic weight lifters performed HPCs at 40%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% of their 1RM while the ground-reaction force and bar/body kinematics were simultaneously recorded. The success criterion during HPC was set above parallel squat at the receiving position. Results: Both peak power and relative peak power were maximized at 80% 1RM (3975.7 [439.1] W, 50.4 [6.6] W/kg, respectively). Peak force, force at peak power, and relative values tended to increase with heavier loads (P < .001), while peak system velocity and system velocity at peak power decreased significantly above 80% 1RM (P = .005 and .011, respectively). There were also significant decreases in peak bar velocity (P < .001) and bar displacement (P < .001) toward heavier loads. There was a strong positive correlation between peak bar velocity and bar displacement in 7 of 8 subjects (r > .90, P < .01). The knee joint angle at the receiving position fell below the quarter-squat position above 70% 1RM. Conclusions: Submaximal loads were indeed optimal for maximal power output for HPC when the success criterion was set above the parallel-squat position. However, when the success criterion was defined as the quarter-squat position, the optimal load became the 1RM load.

Takei is with the Graduate School of Sport Sciences, and Hirayama and Okada, the Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.

Takei (seiichiro@fuji.waseda.jp) is corresponding author.
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Article Sections
References
  • 1.

    Cormie PMcGuigan MRNewton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2—training considerations for improving maximal power production. Sports Med. 2011;41:125146. PubMed ID: 21244105 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Ronai PScibek E. The hang power clean. ACSMs Health Fit J. 2016;20:5055.

  • 3.

    Hori NNewton RUAndrews WAKawamori NMcGuigan MRNosaka K. Does performance of hang power clean differentiate performance of jumping, sprinting, and changing of direction? J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:412418. PubMed ID: 18550955 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Kaneko MFuchimoto TToji HSuei K. Training effect of different loads on the force-velocity relationship and mechanical power output in human muscle. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1983;5:5055.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Wilson GJNewton RUMurphy AJHumphries BJ. The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:12791286. PubMed ID: 8289617 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Suchomel TJBeckham GKWright GA. The impact of load on lower body performance variables during the hang power clean. Sports Biomech. 2014;13:8795. doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Suchomel TJWright GAKernozek TWKline DE. Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:350360. PubMed ID: 23689341 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Suchomel TJSole CJ. Power–time curve comparison between weightlifting derivatives. J Sports Sci Med. 2017;16(3):407413. PubMed ID: 28912659

  • 9.

    Kawamori NCrum AJBlumert PAet al. Influence of different relative intensities on power output during the hang power clean: identification of the optimal load. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:698708. PubMed ID: 16095428

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Kilduff LPBevan HOwen Net al. Optimal loading for peak power output during the hang power clean in professional rugby players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007;2:260269. PubMed ID: 19168926 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Stone MHO’Bryant HSMcCoy LCoglianese RLehmkuhl MSchilling B. Power and maximum strength relationships during performance of dynamic and static weighted jumps. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17:140147. PubMed ID: 12580669

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Maloney SJTurner ANFletcher IM. Ballistic exercise as a pre-activation stimulus: a review of the literature and practical applications. Sports Med. 2014;44:13471359. PubMed ID: 24943044 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Suchomel TJLamont HSMoir GL. Understanding vertical jump potentiation: a deterministic model. Sports Med. 2016;46:809828. PubMed ID: 26712510 doi:

  • 14.

    Caulfield SBerninger D. Exercise technique for free weight and machine training. In: Haff GGTriplett NT eds. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2015:351408.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Suchomel TJSole CJ. Force-time–curve comparison between weight-lifting derivatives. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(4):431439. doi:

  • 16.

    Hopkins WG. A scale of magnitude for effect statistics. https://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html. Updated August 7 2006. Accessed February 3 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Hartmann HWirth KKlusemann M. Analysis of the load on the knee joint and vertebral column with changes in squatting depth and weight load. Sports Med. 2013;43:9931008. PubMed ID: 23821469 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Schoenfeld BJ. Squatting kinematics and kinetics and their application to exercise performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:34973506. PubMed ID: 20182386 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Suchomel TJComfort PLake JP. Enhancing the force–velocity profile of athletes using weight-lifting derivatives. Strength Cond J. 2017;39:1020. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 160 160 38
Full Text Views 12 12 8
PDF Downloads 7 7 6
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar