Purpose: The optimal load for maximal power output during hang power cleans (HPCs) from a mechanical perspective is the 1-repetition-maximum (1RM) load; however, previous research has reported otherwise. The present study thus aimed to investigate the underlying factors that determine optimal load during HPCs. Methods: Eight competitive Olympic weight lifters performed HPCs at 40%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% of their 1RM while the ground-reaction force and bar/body kinematics were simultaneously recorded. The success criterion during HPC was set above parallel squat at the receiving position. Results: Both peak power and relative peak power were maximized at 80% 1RM (3975.7 [439.1] W, 50.4 [6.6] W/kg, respectively). Peak force, force at peak power, and relative values tended to increase with heavier loads (P < .001), while peak system velocity and system velocity at peak power decreased significantly above 80% 1RM (P = .005 and .011, respectively). There were also significant decreases in peak bar velocity (P < .001) and bar displacement (P < .001) toward heavier loads. There was a strong positive correlation between peak bar velocity and bar displacement in 7 of 8 subjects (r > .90, P < .01). The knee joint angle at the receiving position fell below the quarter-squat position above 70% 1RM. Conclusions: Submaximal loads were indeed optimal for maximal power output for HPC when the success criterion was set above the parallel-squat position. However, when the success criterion was defined as the quarter-squat position, the optimal load became the 1RM load.
Takei is with the Graduate School of Sport Sciences, and Hirayama and Okada, the Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Hori N, Newton RU, Andrews WA, Kawamori N, McGuigan MR, Nosaka K. Does performance of hang power clean differentiate performance of jumping, sprinting, and changing of direction? J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:412–418. PubMed ID: 18550955 doi:
HoriN, NewtonRU, AndrewsWA, KawamoriN, McGuiganMR, NosakaK. Does performance of hang power clean differentiate performance of jumping, sprinting, and changing of direction? . 2008;22:412–418. PubMed ID: 18550955 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318166052b18550955)| false
WilsonGJ, NewtonRU, MurphyAJ, HumphriesBJ. The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance. . 1993;25:1279–1286. PubMed ID: 8289617 doi:10.1249/00005768-199311000-000138289617)| false
SuchomelTJ, WrightGA, KernozekTW, KlineDE. Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations. . 2014;28:350–360. PubMed ID: 23689341 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829a36a323689341)| false
Kawamori N, Crum AJ, Blumert PA, et al. Influence of different relative intensities on power output during the hang power clean: identification of the optimal load. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:698–708. PubMed ID: 16095428
KawamoriN, CrumAJ, BlumertPA, et al. Influence of different relative intensities on power output during the hang power clean: identification of the optimal load. . 2005;19:698–708. PubMed ID: 1609542816095428)| false
Kilduff LP, Bevan H, Owen N, et al. Optimal loading for peak power output during the hang power clean in professional rugby players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007;2:260–269. PubMed ID: 19168926 doi:
KilduffLP, BevanH, OwenN, et al. Optimal loading for peak power output during the hang power clean in professional rugby players. . 2007;2:260–269. PubMed ID: 19168926 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2.3.26019168926)| false
Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, McCoy L, Coglianese R, Lehmkuhl M, Schilling B. Power and maximum strength relationships during performance of dynamic and static weighted jumps. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17:140–147. PubMed ID: 12580669
StoneMH, O’BryantHS, McCoyL, CoglianeseR, LehmkuhlM, SchillingB. Power and maximum strength relationships during performance of dynamic and static weighted jumps. . 2003;17:140–147. PubMed ID: 1258066912580669)| false
MaloneySJ, TurnerAN, FletcherIM. Ballistic exercise as a pre-activation stimulus: a review of the literature and practical applications. . 2014;44:1347–1359. PubMed ID: 24943044 doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0214-624943044)| false
Caulfield S, Berninger D. Exercise technique for free weight and machine training. In: Haff GG, Triplett NT, eds. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2015:351–408.
CaulfieldS, BerningerD. Exercise technique for free weight and machine training. In: HaffGG, TriplettNT, eds. . 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2015:351–408.)| false
HartmannH, WirthK, KlusemannM. Analysis of the load on the knee joint and vertebral column with changes in squatting depth and weight load. . 2013;43:993–1008. PubMed ID: 23821469 doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0073-623821469)| false