Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD  $107.00

1 year subscription

USD  $142.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD  $203.00

2 year subscription

USD  $265.00

Background: Pacing studies suggest the distribution of effort for optimizing performance. Cross-sectional studies of 1-mile world records (WRs) suggest that WR progression includes a smaller coefficient of variation of velocity. Purpose: This study evaluates whether intraindividual pacing used by elite runners to break their own WR (1 mile, 5 km, and 10 km) is related to the evolution of pacing strategy. We provide supportive data from analysis in subelite runners. Methods: Men’s WR performances (with 400-m or 1-km splits) in 1 mile, 5 km, and 10 km were retrieved from the IAAF database (from 1924 to present). Data were analyzed relative to pacing pattern when a runner improved their own WR. Similar analyses are presented for 10-km performance in subelite runners before and after intensified training. Results: WR performance was improved in 1 mile (mean [SD]: 3:59.4 [11.2] to 3:57.2 [8.6]), 5 km (13:27 [0:33] to 13:21 [0:33]), and 10 km (28:35 [1:27] to 28:21 [1:21]). The average coefficient of variation did not change in the 1 mile (3.4% [1.8%] to 3.6% [1.6%]), 5 km (2.4% [0.9%] to 2.2% [0.8%]), or 10 km (1.4% [0.1%] to 1.5% [0.6%]) with improved WR. When velocity was normalized to the percentage mean velocity for each race, the pacing pattern was almost identical. Very similar patterns were observed in subelite runners in the 10 km. When time improved from 49:20 (5:30) to 45:56 (4:58), normalized velocity was similar, terminal RPE increased (8.4 [1.6] to 9.1 [0.8]), coefficient of variation was unchanged (4.4% [1.1%] to 4.8% [2.1%]), and VO2max increased (49.8 [7.4] to 55.3 [8.8] mL·min−1·kg−1). Conclusion: The results suggest that when runners break their own best performances, they employ the same pacing pattern, which is different from when WRs are improved in cross-sectional data.

Foster is with the Dept of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA. de Koning and Porcari are with the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA. de Koning and Versteeg are with VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Thiel is with the University of Applied Sciences—Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Boullosa is with Catholic University—Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil. Bok is with the University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Foster ( is corresponding author.
  • 1.

    Joyner M, Coyle EF. Endurance exercise performance: the physiology of champions. J Physiol. 2008;586:35–44. PubMed ID: 17901124 doi:

  • 2.

    Abbiss CR, Laursen PB. Describing and understanding pacing strategy during athletic competition. Sports Med. 2008;38:239–252 PubMed ID: 18278984 doi:

  • 3.

    Thiel C, Foster C, Banzer W, De Koning J. Pacing in Olympic track races: competitive tactics versus best performance strategy. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:1107–1115. PubMed ID: 22738897 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    de Koning JJ, Foster C, Lucia A, Bobbert MF, Hettinga FJ, Porcari JP. Using modeling to understand how athletes in different disciplines solve the same problem: swimming versus running versus speed skating. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011;6:276–280. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Foster C, de Koning JJ, Thiel C. Evolutionary patterns of improved 1-mile running performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:715–719. PubMed ID: 24509568 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Patton CD, Hopkins WG. Competition performance of elite Olympic distance triathletes: reliability and smallest worthwhile enhancement. Sportscience. 2005;9:17–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Aftalion A, Bonnans JF. Optimization of running strategies based on anaerobic energy and variations in velocity. SIAM J Appl Math. 2014;74:1615–1636. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 391 391 40
Full Text Views 33 33 5
PDF Downloads 31 31 4