Context: Warming up in very cold climates and maintaining an elevated body temperature prior to a race is challenging for snow-sport athletes. Purpose: To investigate the effects of active (ACT), passive (PAS), and a combination of ACT and PAS (COM) warm-ups on maximal physical performance in a subzero environment among snow-sport athletes. Methods: Ten junior alpine skiers completed 3 experimental trials in −7.2 (0.2)°C. The ACT involved 5 minutes of moderate cycling, 3 × 15-second accelerations, a 6-second sprint, 5 countermovement jumps (CMJs), and a 10-minute passive transition phase, while in PAS, participants wore a lower-body heated garment for 24 minutes. In COM, participants completed the active warm-up, then wore the heated garment during the transition phase. Two maximal CMJs and a 90-second maximal isokinetic cycling test followed the warm-up. Results: CMJ performance was likely (P = .150) and very likely (P = .013) greater in ACT and COM, respectively, versus PAS. Average power output during the cycling test was likely (P = .074) greater in ACT and COM versus PAS. Participants felt likely to almost certainly warmer (P < .01) and more comfortable (P = .161) during ACT and COM versus PAS. In addition, participants felt likely warmer (P = .136) and very likely more comfortable (P = .161) in COM versus ACT. Conclusions: COM resulted in significantly improved CMJ performance versus PAS while both ACT and COM led to likely improved 90-second cycling performance. Participants felt significantly warmer during ACT and COM versus PAS and likely warmer in COM versus ACT. Therefore, a combined warm-up is recommended for alpine skiers performing in subzero temperatures.
McGawley, Olofsson, and Andersson are with the Swedish Winter Sports Research Center, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden. Spencer is with the Dept of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway, and the Dept of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
WilsonJM, DuncanNM, MarinPJ, et al.Meta-analysis of postactivation potentiation and power: effects of conditioning activity, volume, gender, rest periods, and training status. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(3):854–859. PubMed ID: 22580978 doi:
VeicsteinasA, FerrettiG, MargonatoV, RosaG, TagliabueD. Energy cost of and energy sources for alpine skiing in top athletes. J Appl Physiol. 1984;56(5):1187–1190. PubMed ID: 6725082 doi:10.1152/jappl.19220.127.116.117)| false
GaggeAP, StolwijkJAJ, SaltinB. Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses during exercise at various ambient temperatures. Environ Res. 1969;2(3):209–229. PubMed ID: 5788908 doi:
GaggeAP, StolwijkJAJ, SaltinB. Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses during exercise at various ambient temperatures. Environ Res. 1969;2(3):209–229. PubMed ID: 5788908 doi:10.1016/0013-9351(69)90037-15788908)| false
PatonCD, HopkinsWG. Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(6):444–447. PubMed ID: 16767608 doi:10.1055/s-2005-865781)| false
Barranco-GilD, AlejoLB, ValenzuelaPL, et al. Warming up before a 20-minute endurance effort: is it really worth it?Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020;15(7):964–970. PubMed ID: 32182586 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2019-055432182586)| false
TomarasEK, MacIntoshBR. Less is more: standard warm-up causes fatigue and less warm-up permits greater cycling power output. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(1):228–235. PubMed ID: 21551012 doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00253.2011)| false
CowperG, BarwoodM, GoodallS. Improved 2000-m rowing performance in a cool environment with an external heating garment. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021;16(1):103–109. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2019-0923)| false