Morning Preconditioning Exercise Does Not Increase Afternoon Performance in Competitive Runners

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $114.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $152.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $217.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $289.00

Purpose: Preconditioning exercise is a widely used strategy believed to enhance performance later the same day. The authors examined the influence of preconditioning exercises 6 hours prior to a time-to-exhaustion (TTE) test during treadmill running. Methods: Ten male competitive runners (age = 26 [3] y, height = 184 [8] cm, weight = 73 [9] kg, maximum oxygen consumption = 72 [7] mL·kg−1·min−1) did a preconditioning session of running (RUN) or resistance exercise (RES) or no morning exercise (NoEx) in a randomized order, separated by >72 hours. The RUN consisted of 15 minutes of low-intensity running and 4 × 15 seconds at race pace (21–24 km·h−1) on a treadmill; RES involved 5 minutes of low-intensity running and 2 × 3 repetitions of isokinetic 1-leg shallow squats with maximal mobilization. Following a 6-hour break, electrically evoked force (m. vastus medialis), countermovement jump, running economy, and a TTE of approximately 2 minutes were examined. Results: Relative to NoEx, no difference was seen for RUN or RES in TTE (mean ± 95% CI: −1.3% ± 3.4% and −0.5% ± 6.0%) or running economy (0.2% ± 1.6% and 1.9% ± 2.7%; all Ps > .05). Jump height was not different for the RUN condition (1.0% ± 2.7%]) but tended to be higher in RES than in the NoEx condition (1.5% ± 1.6%, P = .07). The electrically evoked force tended to reveal low-frequency fatigue (reduced 20:50-Hz peak force ratio) only after RES compared to NoEx (−4.5% ± 4.6%, P = .06). Conclusion: The RUN or RES 6 hours prior to approximately 2 minutes of TTE running test did not improve performance in competitive runners.

The authors are with the Dept of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

Losnegard (thomas.losnegard@nih.no) is corresponding author.
  • 1.

    Kilduff LP, Finn CV, Baker JS, Cook CJ, West DJ. Preconditioning strategies to enhance physical performance on the day of competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(6):677681. PubMed ID: 23689163 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Harrison PW, James LP, McGuigan MR, Jenkins DG, Kelly VG. Resistance priming to enhance neuromuscular performance in sport: evidence, potential mechanisms and directions for future research. Sports Med. 2019;49(10):14991514. PubMed ID: 31203499 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    McGowan CJ, Pyne DB, Thompson KG, Raglin JS, Rattray B. Morning exercise: enhancement of afternoon sprint-swimming performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(5):605611. PubMed ID: 27617694 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Cook CJ, Kilduff LP, Crewther BT, Beaven M, West DJ. Morning based strength training improves afternoon physical performance in rugby union players. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(3):317321. PubMed ID: 23707139 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Ekstrand LG, Battaglini CL, McMurray RG, Shields EW. Assessing explosive power production using the backward overhead shot throw and the effects of morning resistance exercise on afternoon performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(1):101106. PubMed ID: 22395279 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Fry AC, Stone MH, Thrush JT, Fleck SJ. Precompetition training sessions enhance competitive performance of high anxiety junior weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res. 1995;9(1):3742.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Marrier B, Durguerian A, Robineau J, et al. Preconditioning strategy in rugby-7s players: beneficial or detrimental? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(7):918–923. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Russell M, King A, Bracken RM, Cook CJ, Giroud T, Kilduff LP. A comparison of different modes of morning priming exercise on afternoon performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(6):763767. PubMed ID: 26658460 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Cook CJ, Crewther BT. The effects of different pre-game motivational interventions on athlete free hormonal state and subsequent performance in professional rugby union matches. Physiol Behav. 2012;106(5):683688. PubMed ID: 22609482 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Sale DG. Postactivation potentiation: role in human performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002;30(3):138143. PubMed ID: 12150573 doi:

  • 11.

    Bauer P, Sansone P, Mitter B, Makivic B, Seitz LB, Tschan H. Acute effects of back squats on countermovement jump performance across multiple sets of a contrast training protocol in resistance-trained Men. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(4):9951000. PubMed ID: 29309389 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Wilson JM, Duncan NM, Marin PJ, et al. Meta-analysis of postactivation potentiation and power: effects of conditioning activity, volume, gender, rest periods, and training status. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(3):854859. PubMed ID: 22580978 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Boullosa D, Beato M, Dello Iacono A, et al. A new taxonomy for postactivation potentiation in sport. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020:15(8):11971200. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Barnes KR, Kilding AE. A randomized crossover study investigating the running economy of highly-trained male and female distance runners in marathon racing shoes versus track spikes. Sports Med. 2019;49(2):331342. PubMed ID: 30374945 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Barnes KR, Kilding AE. Strategies to improve running economy. Sports Med. 2015;45(1):3756. PubMed ID: 25164465 doi:

  • 16.

    Raastad T, Hallén J. Recovery of skeletal muscle contractility after high- and moderate-intensity strength exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82(3):206214. PubMed ID: 10929214 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Raastad T, Owe SG, Paulsen G, et al. Changes in calpain activity, muscle structure, and function after eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(1):8695. PubMed ID: 20010126 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Haugvad A, Haugvad L, Hamarsland H, Paulsen G. Ethanol does not delay muscle recovery but decreases testosterone/cortisol ratio. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(11):21752183. PubMed ID: 24658221 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Losnegard T, Myklebust H, Skattebo O, Stadheim HK, Sandbakk O, Hallen J. The influence of pole length on performance, O2 cost, and kinematics in double poling. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(2):211217. PubMed ID: 27193356 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377381. PubMed ID: 7154893 doi:

  • 21.

    Foss Ø, Hallen J. Validity and stability of a computerized metabolic system with mixing chamber. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26(7):569575. PubMed ID: 16195991 doi:

  • 22.

    Abbiss CR, Laursen PB. Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition. Sports Med. 2008;38(3):239252. PubMed ID: 18278984 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Ingham SA, Fudge BW, Pringle JS, Jones AM. Improvement of 800-m running performance with prior high-intensity exercise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(1):7783. PubMed ID: 22868404 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Olsson K, Cheng AJ, Al-Ameri M, et al. Impaired sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release is the major cause of fatigue-induced force loss in intact single fibres from human intercostal muscle. J Physiol. 2020;598(4):773787. PubMed ID: 31785106 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Saez Saez de Villarreal E, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Izquierdo M. Optimal warm-up stimuli of muscle activation to enhance short and long-term acute jumping performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;100(4):393401. PubMed ID: 17394010 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Komi PV, Rusko H, Vos J, Vihko V. Anaerobic performance capacity in athletes. Acta Physiol Scand. 1977;100(1):107114. PubMed ID: 899821 doi:

  • 27.

    Seitz LB, Haff GG. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46(2):231240. PubMed ID: 26508319 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Rønnestad BR, Hansen EA, Raastad T. In-season strength maintenance training increases well-trained cyclists’ performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110(6):12691282. PubMed ID: 20799042 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Rønnestad BR, Hansen J, Hollan I, Spencer M, Ellefsen S. Impairment of performance variables after in-season strength-training cessation in elite cyclists. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(6):727735. PubMed ID: 26641569 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1214 1214 117
Full Text Views 53 53 10
PDF Downloads 50 50 15