Training Characteristics of a World Championship 5000-m Finalist and Multiple Continental Record Holder Over the Year Leading to a World Championship Final

in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $114.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $152.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $217.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $289.00

Purpose: Optimal training for endurance performance remains a debated topic. In this case study, the training of a world-class middle-/long-distance runner over a year’s duration is presented. Methods: The training is analyzed via 2 methods to define training intensity distribution (TID) (1) by physiological zones and (2) by zones based on race pace. TID was analyzed over the full season, but also over the final 6, 12, and 26 weeks to allow for consideration of periodization/phases of season. The results of both methods are compared. Other training data measured include volume and number of sessions. Results: The average weekly volume for the athlete was 145.8 (24.8) km·wk−1. TID by physiological analysis was polarized for the last 6 weeks of the season but was pyramidal when analyzed over the final 12, 26, and 52 weeks of the season. TID by race-pace analysis was pyramidal across all time points. The athlete finished 12th in the final of the World Championship 5000-m and made the semifinal of the 1500-m. He was ranked in the top 16 in the world for 1500, 5000, and 10,000 m. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate a potential flaw with recent work suggesting polarized training as the most effective means to improve endurance performance. Here, different analysis methods produced 2 different types of TID. A polarized distribution was only seen when analyzed by physiological approach, and only during the last 6 weeks of a 52-week season. Longer-term prospective studies relating performance and physiological changes are suggested.

Kenneally and Santos-Concejero is with the Dept of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. Casado is with the Center for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain. Gomez-Ezeiza is with the Inst of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, and the International Olympic Committee Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.

Casado (arturocasado1500@gmail.com) is corresponding author.
  • 1.

    Seiler KS, Kjerland GO. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16(1):4956. PubMed ID: 16430681 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Casado A, Hanley B, Ruiz-Perez LM. Deliberate practice in training differentiates the best Kenyan and Spanish long-distance runners. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020;20(7):887895. PubMed ID: 31724902 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Stoggl T, Sperlich B. Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training. Front Physiol. 2014;5:33. PubMed ID: 24550842 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Kenneally M, Casado A, Santos-Concejero J. The effect of periodization and training intensity distribution on middle- and long-distance running performance: a systematic review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(9):11141121. PubMed ID: 29182410 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Seiler SaT E. Intervals, threshold and long slow distance: the role of intensity and duration in endurance training. Sports Science. 2009;13:3253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Rosenblat MA, Perrotta AS, Vicenzino B, Polarized vs. Threshold training intensity distribution on endurance sport performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;33(12). doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Kenneally M, Casado A, Gomez-Ezeiza J, Santos-Concejero J. Training intensity distribution analysis by race pace vs. physiological approach in world-class middle- and long-distance runners. Eur J Sport Sci. 2021;21(6):18. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Tjelta LI. The training of international level distance runners. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2016;11(1):122134. doi:

  • 9.

    Enoksen E, Tjelta AR, Tjelta LI. Distribution of training volume and intensity of elite male and female track and marathon runners. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2011;6(2):273293. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Casado A, Hanley B, Santos-Concejero J, Ruiz-Perez LM. World-class long-distance running performances are best predicted by volume of easy runs and deliberate practice of short-interval and tempo runs  [published online April 30, 2019]. J Strength Cond Res. doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Jones AM KB, Clark IE, Rice HM, Fulkerson E, Wylie LJ, Wilkerson DP, Vanhatalo A, Wilkins BW. Physiological demands of running at 2-hour marathon race pace. J Appl Physiol. 2020;130(2). doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Leif Inge T. A longitudinal case study of the training of the 2012 European 1500 m track champion. Int J Appl Sports Sci. 2013;25(1):1118. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 6387 6387 415
Full Text Views 68 68 7
PDF Downloads 110 110 10