Examining Coaches’ Experiences and Opinions of Anti-Doping Education

in International Sport Coaching Journal
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $41.00

1 year subscription

USD $54.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $77.00

2 year subscription

USD $101.00

Although global policy states that coaches are a key stakeholder group for anti-doping education, very little is known about how performance and participation coaches develop their understanding of anti-doping policy and practice. Therefore, 292 UK-based coaches completed an online survey exploring their experiences of anti-doping education (i.e., topics covered, how and by whom the programmes were delivered and how knowledgeable and well-equipped coaches felt to deal with doping-related matters). The results showed that almost a quarter of the surveyed coaches reported never learning about anti-doping. Only a third had engaged with a formal anti-doping education programme and coaches typically received information on detection-deterrence related topics (e.g., banned substances, testing procedures). Many coaches perceived themselves as only having ‘a little’ knowledge about anti-doping and declared themselves as ‘a little’ equipped to work with their sportspeople on doping-related matters. Nonetheless, 96% of coaches were inclined to learn more about anti-doping in the future. Given the World Anti-Doping Code states that anti-doping education for coaches should be compulsory, it is crucial that insights from coaches are made public to inform the development of evidence-informed anti-doping programmes that are tailored and targeted.

The authors are with the Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Address author correspondence to Laurie B. Patterson at L.Patterson@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
International Sport Coaching Journal
Article Sections
References
  • AllenJ.DimeoP.MorrisR.DixonS. & RobinsonL. (2014). Precipitating or prohibiting factor? Examining coaches’ perspectives of their role in doping and anti-doping. Montreal, Canada: World Anti-Doping Agency. Retrieved from www.wada-ama.org

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AllenJ.MorrisR.DimeoP. & RobinsonL. (2017). Precipitating or prohibiting factor: Coaches’ perceptions of their role and actions in anti-doping. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 12(5) 577587. doi:10.1177/1747954117727653

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BackhouseS. & McKennaJ. (2012). Reviewing coaches’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding doping in sport. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 7167175. doi:10.1260/1747-9541.7.1.167

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BackhouseS.PattersonL. & McKennaJ. (2012). Achieving the Olympic ideal: Preventing doping in sport. Performance Enhancement & Health 18385. doi:10.1016/j.peh.2012.08.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BackhouseS.WhitakerL.PattersonL.EricksonK. & McKennaJ. (2016). Social psychology of doping in sport: A mixed-studies narrative synthesis. Montreal, Canada: World Anti-Doping Agency. Retrieved from www.wada-ama.org

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BloodworthA. & McNameeM. (2010). Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: The views of talented young British athletes. International Journal of Drug Policy 21276282.PubMed ID: 20056401 doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.11.009

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BraunV. & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 377101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BraunV.ClarkeV. & WeateP. (2016). Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In B. Smith& A. Sparkes (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise (pp. 191205). Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CallaryB.RathwellS. & YoungB. (2018). Coach education and learning sources for coaches of masters swimmers. International Sport Coaching Journal 5(1) 4759. doi:10.1123/iscj.2017-0056

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Council of Europe. (1989). Anti-Doping Convention (ETS no. 135). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Retrieved from www.coe.int

  • CreswellJ. & CresswellJ. (2018). Research design: qualitative quantitative and mixed method approaches (5th ed.) London, UK: SAGE.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CulverD. & TrudelP. (2008). Clarifying the concept of communities of practice in sport. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 3(1) 110. doi:10.1260/174795408784089441

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CushionC.NelsonL.ArmourK.LyleJ.JonesR.SandfordR. & O’CallaghanC. (2010). Coach learning and development: A review of literature. Leeds, UK: sportscoach UK.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeVellisR. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: SAGE.

  • DriskaA. & GouldD. (2014). Evaluating a problem-based group learning strategy for online, graduate-level coach education. Kinesiology Review 3(4) 227234. doi:10.1123/kr.2014-0061

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DubinC. (1990). Commission of inquiry into the use of drugs and banned practices intended to increase athletic performance. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Government Publishing Centre. Retrieved from www.gc.ca

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EngelbergT. & MostonS. (2016). Inside the locker room: A qualitative study of coaches’ anti-doping knowledge, beliefs and attitudes. Sport in Society 19(7) 942956. doi:10.1080/17430437.2015.1096244

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EricksonK.BrunerM.MacDonaldD. & CôtéJ. (2008). Gaining insight into actual and preferred sources of coaching knowledge. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 3(4) 527538. doi:10.1260/174795408787186468

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Estâvão CorreiaM. E. & BertramR. (2018). The surfing coaching: Sources of knowledge acquisition. International Sport Coaching Journal 5(1) 1423. doi:10.1123/iscj.2017-0083

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission. (2016). Study on sport qualifications acquired through sport organisations and (sport) educational institutes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from www.publications.europa.eu

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fainaru-WadaM. & WilliamsL. (2006). Game of shadows. New York, NY: Gotham.

  • FjeldheimT. (1992). Sports instructors and leaders: Attitudes toward doping in sports. Collegium Antropologicum 16343348.

  • FungL. & YuanY. (2006). Performance enhancement drugs: Knowledge, attitude and intended behaviour among community coaches in Hong Kong. The Sport Journal 9(3).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • González-RiveraM.Campos-IzquierdoA.VillalbaA. & HallN. (2017). Sources of knowledge used by Spanish coaches: A study according to competition level, gender and professional experience. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 12(2) 162174. doi:10.1177/1747954117694733

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoslinA.E. & DaviesK. (2014). Measuring service quality of international tennis coach education courses. African Journal for Physical Health Education Recreation and Dance 20(1) 1123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Council for Coaching Excellence Association of Summer Olympic International Federations & Leeds Metropolitan University. (2013). International Sport Coaching Framework Version 1.2. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KnowlesM.HoltonE. & SwansonR. (2011). The adult learner (6th ed.). London, UK: Elsevier.

  • Lara-BercialS. & MallettC. (2016). The practices and developmental pathways of professional and Olympic serial winning coaches. International Sport Coaching Journal 3(3) 221239. doi:10.1123/iscj.2016-0083

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lara-BercialS.NorthJ.HämäläinenK.OltmannsK.MinkhorstJ. & PetrovicL. (2017). European Sport Coaching Framework. Retrieved from http://www.coachlearn.eu/european-sport-coaching-framework.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LaureP.ThouveninF. & LecerfT. (2001). Attitudes of coaches towards doping. Journal of Sports Medicine & Physical Fitness 41132136.PubMed ID: 11317161

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MandicG.F.PericM.KrzeljL.StankovicS. & ZenicN. (2013). Sports nutrition and doping factors in synchronized swimming: Parallel analysis among athletes and coaches. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 12(4) 753760.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MazanovJ.HemphillD.ConnorJ.QuirkF. & BackhouseS. (2015). Australian athlete support personnel lived experience of anti-doping. Sport Management Review 18(2) 218230. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.05.007

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McLarenR. (2016). The Independent Person 2nd Report. Commissioned Report for the World Anti-Doping Agency. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/mclaren_report_part_ii_2.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MesquitaI.RibeiroJ.SantosS. & MorganK. (2014). Coach learning and coach education: Portuguese expert coaches’ perspective. Sport Psychologist 28(2) 124136. doi:10.1123/tsp.2011-0117

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MorganK.JonesR.GilbourneD. & LlewellynD. (2013). Changing the face of coach education: Using ethno-drama to depict lived realities. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 18(5) 520533. doi:10.1080/17408989.2012.690863

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NelsonL.CushionC. & PotracP. (2013). Enhancing the provision of coach education: the recommendations of UK coaching practitioners. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 18(2) 204218. doi:10.1080/17408989.2011.649725

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NorthJ. (2009). The UK coaching workforce. Leeds, UK: Sports Coach UK. Retrieved from www.ukcoaching.org

  • OutramS. & StewartB. (2015). Doping through supplement use: A review of the available empirical data. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism 25(1) 5459.PubMed ID: 25722470 doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0174

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PattersonL. & BackhouseS. (2018). “An important cog in the wheel”, but not the driver: Coaches’ perceptions of their role in doping prevention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 37117127. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.05.004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PattersonL.B.DuffyP.J. & BackhouseS.H. (2014). Are coaches anti-doping? Exploring issues of engagement with education and research. Substance Use & Misuse 49(9) 11821185. doi:10.3109/10826084.2014.912469

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London, UK: SAGE.

  • PetersC.SchulzT.OberhofferR. & MichnaH. (2009). Doping and doping prevention: Knowledge, attitudes and expectations of athletes and coaches. Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Sportmedizin 607378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RobsonC. (2011). Real world research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

  • RodekJ.SekulicD. & KondricM. (2012). Dietary supplementation and doping-related factors in high-level sailing. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 9(1) 5160.PubMed ID: 23217197 doi:10.1186/1550-2783-9-51

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SajberD.RodekJ.EscalanteY.Olujic´D. & SekulicD. (2013). Sport nutrition and doping factors in swimming; parallel analysis among athletes and coaches. Collegium Antropologicum 37(Suppl. 2) 179186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithB. & McGannonK. (2017). Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11(1) 101121. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sports CoachUK. (2011). Sports coaching in the UK III. Retrieved from https://www.ukcoaching.org/sites/default/files/Sports-Coaching-in-the-UK-III.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StodterA. & CushionC. (2017). What works in coach learning, how, and for whom? A grounded process of soccer coaches’ professional learning. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health 9(3) 321338. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2017.1283358

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StoszkowskiJ. & CollinsD. (2016). Sources, topics and use of knowledge by coaches. Journal of Sports Sciences 34(9) 794802. PubMed ID: 26222481 doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1072279

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TabachnickB. & FidellL. (2013). Using multivariate statistics: Pearson new international edition (6th ed.) Essex, UK: Pearson.

  • TrudelP.CulverD. & WertnerP. (2013). Looking at coach development from the coach-learner’s perspective: considerations for coach development administrators. In P. PotracW. Gilbert & J. Denison (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Sports Coaching (pp. 375387). London, UK: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UKAD. (2012a). Coach Clean. Retrieved from http://ukad.coachwisehub.com/store/39534-coach-clean-ukad

  • UKAD. (2012b). Online learning resource now available for coaches. Retrieved from https://www.ukad.org.uk/news/article/coach-clean-launch

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UKAD. (2017). Rule violations. Retrieved from https://www.ukad.org.uk/anti-doping-rule-violations/current-violations

  • UngerleiderS. (2001). Faust’s Gold. Inside the East German Doping Machine. New York, NY: Thomas Dunne.

  • VankhadloA. & PlanidaE. (2013). Knowledge attitudes and practice of coaches belonging to different generations in relation to doping behaviour or athletes. Montreal, Canada: World Anti-Doping Agency. Retrieved from www.wada-ama.org

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WADA. (2010). CoachTrue. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/education-awareness/tools-for-stakeholders/coachtrue

  • WADA. (2015). World Anti-Doping Code. Montreal, Canada: World Anti-Doping Agency. Retrieved from www.wada-ama.org

  • WADA. (2016). Coach’s Tool Kit. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/education-and-awareness/coachs-tool-kit

Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 224 224 106
Full Text Views 13 13 2
PDF Downloads 7 7 3
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar