Backwards Design and Program Level Approaches to Coach Development in Higher Education

in International Sport Coaching Journal
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $41.00

1 year subscription

USD $54.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $77.00

2 year subscription

USD $101.00

Because there is no single governing sport body in the United States devoted to coaching education, coaching requirements can vary greatly state-to-state and between organizations within the same state. Therefore, it often is up to club programs or universities to devise individual curriculum for coaching education. For those responsible for coaching education, utilizing backwards design can ensure programs meet the learning and professional development needs of coaches. In backwards design, identifying coaches’ needs and creating program-level learning outcomes occurs prior to specific content selection. Additionally, backwards design encourages instructors to select assessments and learning activities that align with the program-level learning outcomes. In this article, a group of faculty describe their experience utilizing backwards design in creating a college/university certificate program focused on sport coaching. Specifically, a description of the following is included: (a) the process used to create program-level learning outcomes, (b) how to emphasize the program-level learning outcomes throughout the program’s coursework, and (c) a specific example from one course in the curriculum. Finally, we provide lessons learned throughout the process and recommendations for program development in hopes that coach developers can utilize this process in designing their own curricula.

The authors are with the Kinesiology Department, Center for Physical Activity and Sport, Boise State University, Boise ID.

Address author correspondence to Eric M. Martin at ericmmartin@boisestate.edu.
International Sport Coaching Journal
Article Sections
References
  • AbateM.A.StamatakisM.K. & HaggettR.R. (2003). Excellence in curriculum development and assessment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 67(3) 89. doi:10.5688/aj670389

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AllenD. & TannerK. (2003). Approaches to cell biology teaching: Learning content in context—problem-based learning. Cell Biology Education 2(2) 7381. PubMed ID: 12888838 doi:10.1187/cbe.03-04-0019

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarlsonD.L. & MarshallP.A. (2009). Learning the science of research, learning the art of teaching: Planning backwards in a college genetics course. Bioscience Education 13(1) 19. doi:10.3108/beej.13.4

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CôtéJ. & GilbertW. (2009). An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 4(3) 307323. doi:10.1260/174795409789623892

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DennyJ.C.SmithersJ.D.ArmstrongB. & SpickardA.III. (2005). “Where do we teach what?” Finding broad concepts in the medical school curriculum. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20(10) 943946. PubMed ID: 16191143 doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0203.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EricksonK.BrunerM.W.MacDonaldD.J. & CôtéJ. (2008). Gaining insight into actual and preferred sources of coaching knowledge. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 3(4) 527538. doi:10.1260/174795408787186468

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HardenR.M. (2001). AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher 23(2) 123137. PubMed ID: 11371288 doi:10.1080/01421590120036547

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Council for Coaching Excellence and the Association of Summer Olympic International Federations. (2012). International Sport Coaching Framework. Retrieved from https://www.icce.ws/_assets/files/news/ISCF_1_aug_2012.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kelting-GibsonL.M. (2005). Comparison of curriculum development practices. Educational Research Quarterly 29(1) 2636.

  • MartinE.M. (2017). Idaho High School Activities Association 2017 coaches’ needs assessment. (Unpublished company report). Boise, ID: Idaho High School Activities Association.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MillikenF.J. & MartinsL.L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 21 402433. doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RichardsJ.C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal 44(1) 533. doi:10.1177/0033688212473293

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RothD. (2007). Understanding by design: a framework for effecting curricular development and assessment. CBE—Life Sciences Education 6(2) 9597. PubMed ID: 31452391

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SHAPE America. (2017). National standards for sport coaches by core responsibility. Retrieved from https://www.shapeamerica.org/uploads/pdfs/2018/standards/National-Standards-for-Sport-Coaches-DRAFT.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States Olympic Committee. (2017). Quality coaching framework. Retrieved from https://www.teamusa.org/About-the-USOC/Athlete-Development/CoachingEducation/Quality-Coaching-Framework

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VieiraC. & MaganaA.J. (2013). Using backwards design process for the design and implementation of computer science (CS) principles: A case study of a Colombian elementary and secondary teacher development program. Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference 2013 879885.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WhettenD.A. (2007). Principles of effective course design: What I wish I had known about learning-centered teaching 30 years ago. Journal of Management Education 31(3) 339357. doi:10.1177/1052562906298445

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WigginsG. & McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 138 138 43
Full Text Views 36 36 18
PDF Downloads 30 30 16
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar