Classification and Comparison of Biomechanical Response Strategies for Accommodating Landing Impact

in Journal of Applied Biomechanics
View More View Less
  • 1 Texas Tech University
  • 2 University of Oregon
  • 3 Human Performance and Wellness, Inc.
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $88.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $118.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $168.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $224.00

The purposes of this study were to (a) present a theoretical model to explain the methods by which individuals accommodate impact force in response to increases in an applied stressor, (b) use the model and a correlation procedure to classify a sample of individuals based on their observed response patterns, and (c) statistically evaluate the classification process. Ten participants performed landings from three heights while video and force platform data were being collected. Magnitudes of impact-force characteristics from ground reaction force and lower extremity joint moments were evaluated relative to changes in landing momentum. Correlation between impact force and landing momentum was used to classify participant responses into either a positive or negative biomechanical strategy, as defined by the model. Positive and negative groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results indicated that all responses fit within the categories defined by the model. Some individuals preferred positive strategies while others preferred negative ones depending on the specific variable. Only one participant consistently exhibited the negative strategy for all variables. Positive and negative groups were determined to be statistically different, p ≤ 0.05, for 61% of the comparisons, suggesting actual differences between groups. The proposed model appeared robust and accounted for all responses in the current experiment. The model should be evaluated further using landing and other impact activities; it should be refined and used to help researchers understand individual impact-response strategies in order to identify those who may be at risk for impact related injuries.

C.R. James is with the Dept. of Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences, Box 43011 Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409-3011; B.T. Bates is with the Dept. of Exercise and Movement Science, Univ. of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; J.S. Dufek is with Human Performance and Wellness, Inc., 240 Potosi Way, Henderson, NV 89074.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 99 86 2
Full Text Views 20 20 0
PDF Downloads 29 29 0