Manual Materials Handling in Simulated Motion Environments

in Journal of Applied Biomechanics
View More View Less
  • 1 McMaster University
  • 2 Memorial University of Newfoundland
  • 3 University of New Brunswick
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $88.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $118.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $168.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $224.00

Seafaring occupations have been shown to place operators at an increased risk for injury. The purpose of this study was to understand better the demands of a moving environment on the ability of a person to perform specific lifting tasks. Subjects lifted a 15-kg load under four different lifting conditions. A 6-degree-of-freedom ship motion simulator imposed repeatable deck motions under foot while subjects executed the lifting tasks. Subjects were oriented in three different positions on the simulator floor to inflict different motion profiles. Electromyographic records of four muscles were collected bilaterally, and thoracolumbar kinematics were measured. A repeated-measures ANOVA was employed to assess trunk motions and muscle activities across lifting and motion conditions. The erector spinae muscles showed a trend toward significant differences for motion effects. Maximal sagittal velocities were significantly smaller for all motion states in comparison with the stable condition (p ≤ .01), whereas maximum twisting and lateral bending velocities were higher (p ≤ .05). Results suggest working in a moving environment will likely increase the operator’s risk for overexertion injuries, particularly to the trunk region.

Holmes is with the Occupational Biomechanics Laboratory, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; MacKinnon and Mills are with the School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL; and Matthews and Albert are with the Department of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB.