A Comparison between Two Models of Shoulder Muscle Force Estimation

in Journal of Applied Biomechanics

Click name to view affiliation

Daniel Cury RibeiroFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Search for other papers by Daniel Cury Ribeiro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joelly Mahnic de ToledoFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Search for other papers by Joelly Mahnic de Toledo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roberto Costa KrugFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Search for other papers by Roberto Costa Krug in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jefferson Fagundes LossFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Search for other papers by Jefferson Fagundes Loss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Shoulder injuries are often related to rotator cuff muscles. Although there are various models for muscle force estimation, it is difficult to ensure that the results obtained with such models are reliable. The aim of the current study was to compare two models of muscle force estimation. Eight subjects, seven male and one female (mean age of 24 yr; mean height of 1.83 m), performed five isokinetic maximum concentric contractions of internal and external shoulder rotation. Two models with different algorithms were used. In both, the input data consisted of the measured internal rotation moment. Comparisons were made between the difference and the average results obtained with each model of muscle force estimation. There was reasonable agreement among the results for force between the two models for subscapularis, pectoralis major, and anterior deltoideus muscles results. Conversely, poor correlation was found for the latissimus dorsi, teres major, and middle deltoid. These results suggest that the algorithm structure might have a strong effect on muscle force estimation results.

The authors are with Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre City, RS, Brazil.

  • Collapse
  • Expand