Ramp Angle, Not Plateau Height, Influences Transition Strategies

in Journal of Applied Biomechanics
View More View Less
  • 1 Brooke Army Medical Center
  • | 2 The Pennsylvania State University
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $90.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $120.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $172.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $229.00

In a previous study, we found that participants modified how they transitioned onto and off of ramp configurations depending upon the incline. While the transition strategies were originally attributed to ramp angles, it is possible that the plateau influenced the strategies since the final surface height also differed. Ultimately, for the current study, we hypothesized that an individual’s transition strategies would have significant main effects for ramp angle, but not plateau height. Twelve healthy, young adults transitioned onto 3 distinct ramp configurations, a 2.4-m ramp angled at 12.5° ending at a plateau height of 53 cm, a 1.2-m ramp angled at 23.5° ending at a plateau height of 53 cm, and a 2.4-m ramp angled at 23.5° ending at a plateau height of 99.5 cm. Kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity were measured during the stance phase before contacting the ramp. In support of our hypothesis, impact peak, active peak, and all of the muscle activity variables had a significant main effect for ramp angle, with greater vertical force peaks and muscle activity on steeper ramp transitions. These findings support our previous interpretation that individuals use estimations of ramp angle, not plateau height, to determine their transition strategies.

Sheehan is with The Military Performance Lab, Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, TX. Gottschall is with the Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Address author correspondence to Riley C. Sheehan at rileycsheehan@gmail.com.
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 985 436 4
Full Text Views 5 4 0
PDF Downloads 5 5 0