Experiences of Undergraduates Publishing Biomechanics Research

in Journal of Applied Biomechanics
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Suffolk
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $88.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $118.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $168.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $224.00

The aim of this study was to investigate student experiences of publishing undergraduate research in biomechanics. A total of 29 former students with experience of publishing peer-reviewed undergraduate biomechanics research completed an online survey regarding their perceived benefits, level of involvement, and experiences in aspects of the research process. On average, students perceived their experiences to be “largely helpful” or greater in all aspects. Areas were identified corresponding to: the greatest perceived benefits (eg, understanding of the research process); the least perceived benefits (eg, statistical analysis skills); the greatest student involvement (eg, reading relevant literature); and the least student involvement (eg, developing hypotheses and/or methods). A thematic analysis of open question responses identified themes relating to: future career, skills, scientific process, intra- and interpersonal factors, and pedagogy. Common intended learning outcomes may be achieved through involvement in the research process independently of the level of staff involvement. Staff should be encouraged to involve students in publishable biomechanics research projects where this is possible without compromising research standards and should explore ways of recreating the publishing process internally for all students.

McErlain-Naylor (S.McErlain-Naylor@uos.ac.uk) is with the School of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, United Kingdom.

  • 1.

    Cook-Sather A, Bovill C, Felten P. Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for FacultySan Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Jarvis J, Dickerson C, Stockwell L. Staff-student partnership in practice in higher education: the impact on learning and teaching. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;90:220225. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.085

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Wenstone R. A Manifesto for Partnership. 2015. https://www.nus.org.uk/PageFiles/12238/AManifestoforPartnership.pdf

  • 4.

    Council on Undergraduate Research. Joint Statement of Principles in Support of Undergraduate Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities; 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Zydney AL, Bennett JS, Shahid A, Bauer K. Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate research experience in science and engineering. J Eng Educ. 2002;91(3):291297. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00706.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Morales DX, Grineski SE, Collins TW. Increasing research productivity in undergraduate research experiences: exploring predictors of collaborative faculty–student publications. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017;16(3):ar42. PubMed ID: 28747352 doi:10.1187/cbe.16-11-0326

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Koch C, Johnson WB. Documenting the benefits of undergraduate mentoring. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 2000;20(4):172175. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=psyc_fac

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Busch JW. Mentoring in graduate schools of education: Mentors’ perceptions. Am Educ Res J. 1985;22(2):257265. doi:10.3102/00028312022002257

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Healey M. Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. J Geogr High Educ. 2005;29(2):183201. doi:10.1080/03098260500130387

  • 10.

    Griffiths R. Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: the case of the built environment disciplines. Stud High Educ. 2004;29(6):709726. doi:10.1080/0307507042000287212

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Healey M, Jenkins A. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy; 2009.

  • 12.

    Cuneo C, Harnish D, Roy D, Vajoczki S. Lessons learned: The McMaster inquiry story from innovation to institutionalization. New Dir Teach Learn. 2012;129:93104. doi:10.1002/tl.20010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Mickley Steinmetz KR, Reid AK. Providing outstanding undergraduate research experiences and sustainable faculty development in load. Front Psychol. 2019;10:196. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00196

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Wieth MB, Francis AP, Christopher AN. Use of a creative problem solving (CPS) approach in a senior thesis course to advance undergraduate publications. Front Psychol. 2019;10:749. PubMed ID: 31024393 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00749

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Giuliano T, Skorinko JLM, Fallon M. Editorial: engaging undergraduates in publishable research: best practices. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1878. PubMed ID: 31507477 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01878

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Salsman N, Dulaney C, Chinta R, Zascavage V, Joshi H. Student effort in and perceived benefits from undergraduate research. Coll Stud J. 2013;47(1):202211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Matthews SJ, Rosa MN. Trials, tribulations, and triumphs: research and publishing from the undergraduate perspective. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2411. PubMed ID: 30559700 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02411

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Golding RM, Breen LJ, Krause AE, Allen PJ. The summer undergraduate research experience as a work-integrated learning opportunity and potential pathway to publication in psychology. Front Psychol. 2019;10:541. PubMed ID: 30949090 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00541

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Healey M. Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In: Barnett R, ed. Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press; 2005:3042.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Braxton JM, Hargens LL. Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In: Smart JC, ed. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. 11th ed. New York, NY: Agathon Press; 1996:146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Weiner SA, Watkinson C. What do students learn from participation in an undergraduate research journal? Results of an assessment. J Librariansh Sch Commun. 2014;2(2):1125. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1125

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Garceau LR, Ebben WP, Knudson D V. Teaching practices of the undergraduate introductory biomechanics faculty: a North American survey. Sport Biomech. 2012;11(4):542558. doi:10.1080/14763141.2012.725764

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Deutsch H, Young O, Shapiro R, et al. Present status of kinesiology: results of a national survey. In: Dillman CJ, Sears R, eds. Proceedings: Kinesiology: A National Conference on Teaching. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1978:1727.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Marett JR, Pavlacka JA, Siler WL, Shapiro R. Kinesiology status update: a national survey. In: Shapiro R, Marrett JR, eds. Proceedings: Second National Symposium on Teaching Kinesiology and Biomechanics in Sports. Colorado Springs, CO: United States Olympic Committee; 1984:715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Satern MN. Teaching undergraduate biomechanics/kinesiology: a national study. AAHPERD National Convention; 1997.

    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Garceau LR, Knudson DV, Ebben WP. Fourth North American survey of undergraduate biomechanicsinstructioninkinesiology/exercise science. In: Vilas-Boas JP, Machado ML, Kim W, Velosoet AP, eds. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports. Porto, Portugal; 2011:951954.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Fugard AJB, Potts HWW. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2015;18(6):669684. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Braun V, Clarke V. (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2016;19(6):739743. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Hammersley M. Sampling and thematic analysis: a response to Fugard and Potts. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2015;18(6):687688. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005456

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Braun V, Clarke V. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: Sage; 2013.

  • 31.

    Mabrouk PA, Peters K. Student perspectives on undergraduate research (UR) experiences in chemistry and biology. CUR Q. 2000;21(1):2533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Adler D, Kelly ST. vioplot: violin plot. R package version 0.3.2. 2018. https://github.com/TomKellyGenetics/vioplot.

  • 33.

    Sheldon MR, Fillyaw MJ, Thompson WD. The use and interpretation of the Friedman test in the analysis of ordinal-scale data in repeated measures designs. Physiother Res Int. 1996;1(4):221228. PubMed ID: 9238739 doi:10.1002/pri.66

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Conover WJ, Iman RL. On multiple-comparisons procedures. Los Alamos Sci Lab Tech Rep LA-7677-MS. 1979.

  • 35.

    Conover WJ. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1999.

  • 36.

    Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):6570.

  • 37.

    Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952;47(260):583621. doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57(1):289300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

  • 40.

    Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436445. doi:10.2307/798843

  • 41.

    Brew A. Research and teaching from the students’ perspective. International Policies and Practices for Academic Enquiry: An International Colloquium. Winchester, UK; 2007:1921.

    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Murtonen M. University students’ research orientations: do negative attitudes exist toward quantitative methods? Scand J Educ Res. 2005;49(3):263280. doi:10.1080/00313830500109568

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Biggs J. Aligning teaching for constructing learning. High Educ Acad. 2003;1(4). doi:10.1063/1.3100776

  • 44.

    Craney C, McKay T, Mazzeo A, Morris J, Prigodich C, de Groot R. Cross-discipline perceptions of the undergraduate research experience. J Higher Educ. 2011;82(1):92113. doi:10.1353/jhe.2011.0000

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Hodge D, Pasquesi K, Hirsh M, LePore P. From convocation to capstone: developing the student as scholar. Keynote Address at the Association of American Colleges and Universities Network for Academic Renewal Conference. Long Beach, California; 2007.

    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Hattie J, Marsh HW. The relationship between research and teaching: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 1996;66(4):507542. doi:10.3102/00346543066004507

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Jenkins A. Adaptation of US Undergraduate Research Schemes for Mainstream Development in the UK and Other International Contexts: Principles and Policies; 2008. http://www.alanjenkins.info/publications/jenkins_final_report.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Brew A, Boud D. Teaching and research: establishing the vital link with learning. High Educ. 1995;29(3):261273. doi:10.1007/BF01384493

  • 49.

    Healey M, Jenkins A. Strengthening the teaching-research linkage in undergraduate courses and programs. New Dir Teach Learn. 2006;107:4555. doi:10.1002/tl.244

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Jenkins A, Healey M, Zetter R. Linking Teaching and Research in Disciplines and Departments. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy; 2007. http://edshare.soton.ac.uk/349/1/LinkingTeachingAndResearch_April07.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Jenkins A, Breen R, Brew A, Lindsay R. Reshaping Teaching in Higher Education: Linking Teaching With Research. London: SEDA/RoutledgeFalmer; 2003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Walkington H. Students as Researchers: Supporting Undergraduate Research in the Disciplines in Higher Education; https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/students-researchers-supporting-undergraduate-research-disciplines-higher-education?PageSpeed=noscript

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Morrison JA, Barthell JF, Boettcher A, et al. Recognizing and Valuing the Mentoring of Undergraduate Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activity by Faculty Members: Workload, Tenure, Promotion, and Award Systems; 2019. https://www.cur.org/assets/1/23/CURWhitePaper2.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 63 63 63
Full Text Views 13 13 13
PDF Downloads 7 7 7