Tibial Acceleration Reliability and Minimal Detectable Difference During Overground and Treadmill Running

in Journal of Applied Biomechanics

Click name to view affiliation

Kevin G. AubolDrexel University

Search for other papers by Kevin G. Aubol in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Jillian L. HawkinsDrexel University

Search for other papers by Jillian L. Hawkins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
, and
Clare E. MilnerDrexel University

Search for other papers by Clare E. Milner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
Restricted access

Measurements of tibial acceleration during running must be reliable to ensure valid results and reduce errors. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and minimal detectable difference (MDD) of peak axial and peak resultant tibial acceleration during overground and treadmill running. The authors also compared reliability and MDDs when peak tibial accelerations were determined by averaging 5 or 10 trials. Tibial acceleration was measured during overground and treadmill running of 19 participants using a lightweight accelerometer mounted to the tibia. Peak axial and peak resultant tibial accelerations were determined for each trial. Intraclass correlation coefficients determined within-session reliability, and MDDs were also calculated. Within-session reliability was excellent for all conditions (intraclass correlation coefficients  = .95–.99). The MDDs ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 g for peak axial acceleration and from 1.6 to 2.0 g for peak resultant acceleration and were lowest for peak axial tibial acceleration during overground running. Averaging 10 trials did not improve reliability compared to averaging 5 trials but did result in small reductions in MDDs. For peak axial tibial acceleration only, lower MDDs indicate that overground running may be the better option for detecting small differences.

The authors are with the Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Aubol (kga43@drexel.edu) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Davis I, Milner C, Hamill J. Does increased loading during running lead to tibial stress fractures? A prospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(5):S58.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, Hamill J, Davis IS. Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(2):323328. PubMed ID: 16531902 doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000183477.75808.92

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Van den Berghe P, Six J, Gerlo J, Leman M, De Clercq D. Validity and reliability of peak tibial accelerations as real-time measure of impact loading during over-ground rearfoot running at different speeds. J Biomech. 2019;86:238242. PubMed ID: 30824234 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.039

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Sheerin KR, Besier TF, Reid D, Hume PA. The one-week and six-month reliability and variability of three-dimensional tibial acceleration in runners. Sports Biomech. 2018;17(4):531540. PubMed ID: 29171352 doi:10.1080/14763141.2017.1371214

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sports Sci. 1992;17(4):338345.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA. Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech. 1980;13(5):397406. PubMed ID: 7400169 doi:10.1016/0021-9290(80)90033-0

  • 7.

    Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17(1):101110. PubMed ID: 9463853 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Milner CE, Hawkins JL, Aubol KG. Tibial impact acceleration during running outdoors is higher than during laboratory gait analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;52(6):13611366.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.

  • 10.

    Aubol KG, Hawkins JL, Milner CE. Foot contact identification using a tibial mounted accelerometer during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):775. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000562812.76264.46

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Portney L, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2009

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2198 845 94
Full Text Views 46 3 0
PDF Downloads 41 5 0