Self-Efficacy for Physical Activity—A Question of Item Framing and Age?

in Journal of Aging and Physical Activity

Click name to view affiliation

Johanna Popp
Search for other papers by Johanna Popp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nanna Notthoff
Search for other papers by Nanna Notthoff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Lisa Marie Warner
Search for other papers by Lisa Marie Warner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Older adults process and remember positive information relatively better than negative information, compared with younger adults; this is known as the positivity effect. This study examined whether older adults compared with younger adults also respond differently to positively and negatively framed questionnaire items. Participants (N = 275; age = 18–81 years) were randomly assigned to a positively or negatively framed version of a self-efficacy for physical activity questionnaire. Self-efficacy, physical activity intentions, and planned physical activity in the following week were regressed on experimental group and age, controlling for baseline physical activity and covariates. A significant Age × Frame interaction showed that item framing made a difference in planned physical activity for the oldest age group (+350 min compared with the youngest group). This study provides initial support for the positivity effect in item framing on physical activity plans, but not on intentions or self-efficacy. Item framing should be taken into consideration for accurate measurement, but could also be a simple intervention approach.

Popp and Notthoff are with the Institut für Psychologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Notthoff is also with Sportwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. Warner is with Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Warner (lisa.warner@medicalschool-berlin.de) is corresponding author.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Material A (PDF 667 KB)
    • Supplementary Material B (PDF 443 KB)
    • Supplementary Material C (PDF 442 KB)
    • Supplementary Material D (PDF 439 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand