CMPC® Certification as a Milestone, Not a Millstone: A Response to Scherzer and Reel

in Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $58.00

1 year subscription

USD $77.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $110.00

2 year subscription

USD $144.00

In this commentary, we respond to Scherzer and Reel’s concerns over the Certified Mental Performance Consultant® (CMPC®) certification program requirements, particularly the certification exam. A reframing is suggested, in which the exam and recertification requirements are viewed as exciting historical milestones and an opportunity for individual professional growth as opposed to a personal inconvenience. In addition, some historical context and rationale for specific aspects of the CMPC certification program are provided, including the rationale for the CMPC credential.

Vealey is with Miami University, Oxford, OH. Galli is with the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Harmison is with James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA.

Address author correspondence to Robin S. Vealey at vealeyrs@miamioh.edu.
Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology
Article Sections
References
  • Association for Applied Sport Psychology. (2018). Candidate handbook: Certified Mental Performance Consultant® (CMPC®) certification program. Retrieved from https://appliedsportpsych.org/site/assets/files/30025/cmpccandidatehandbook2018-06.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DweckC.S. (2006). Mindset. New York, NY: Ballantine.

  • GardnerF.L. (1991). Professionalization of sport psychology: A reply to Silva. The Sport Psychologist 5 5560. doi:10.1123/tsp.5.1.55

  • HarrisonR.P. & FeltzD.L. (1979). The professionalization of sport psychology: Legal considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology 1 182190. doi:10.1123/jsp.1.3.182

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Institute for Credentialing Excellence. (2019). About ICE. Retrieved from https://www.credentialingexcellence.org/p/cm/id/fid=32.

  • National Commission for Certifying Agencies. (2004). Standards for the accreditation of certification programs. Washington, DC: Institute for Credentialing Excellence.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NidefferR.FeltzD. & SalmelaJ. (1982). A rebuttal to Danish and Hale: A committee report. Journal of Sport Psychology 4 36. doi:10.1123/jsp.4.1.3

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PortengaS.T.AoyagiM.W. & CohenA.B. (2017). Helping to build a profession: A working definition of sport and performance psychology. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action 8 4759. doi:10.1080/21520704.2016.1227413

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ScherzerC.B. & ReelJ.J. (2018). CMPC exam for recertification: The good, the bad, the reality. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology 12 467470. doi:10.1123/jcsp.2018-0040

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SilvaJ.M. (1989). Toward the professionalization of sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist 3 265273. doi:10.1123/tsp.3.3.265

  • VealeyR.S. (2006). Smocks and jocks outside the box: The paradigmatic evolution of sport and exercise psychology. Quest 58 128159. doi:10.1080/00336297.2006.10491876

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonJ.C. & PortengaS.T. (2014). An overview of the issues affecting the future of certification in sport psychology. Athletic Insight 6 261276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 58 58 21
Full Text Views 13 13 7
PDF Downloads 12 12 6
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar