A Qualitative Exploration of Choking in Elite Golf

in Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Gloucestershire
  • 2 University of Wales, Institute, Cardiff
  • 3 University of Gloucestershire
  • 4 University of Wales, Institute, Cardiff
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $59.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $79.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $113.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $150.00

This study explores the antecedents, mechanisms, influencing variables, and consequences of choking in sport and identifies interventions that may alleviate choking. Through the use of qualitative methods, the experiences of six elite golfers who choked frequently under pressure were examined and compared with five elite golfers who excelled frequently under pressure. The perspectives of four coaches who had worked extensively with elite golfers who had choked and excelled, were also considered. The study indicated that the participants choked as a result of distraction, which was caused by various stressors. Self-confidence, preparation, and perfectionism were identified as key influencing variables of the participants’ choking episodes, and the consequence of choking was a significant drop in performance that affected negatively future performances. Process goals, cognitive restructuring, imagery, simulated training, and a pre/postshot routine were perceived as interventions that may possibly prevent choking.

Denise Hill is a senior lecturer in sport and exercise psychology at the University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, UK.. Sheldon Hanton is a professor of sport psychology at the Cardiff School of Sport, University of Wales, Institute, Cardiff. Nic Matthews is senior lecturer in sports management at the University of Gloucestershire in Gloucester, UK. Scott Fleming is Director of Research and professor of sport and leisure studies at the University of Wales Institute, Cardiff, UK.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 655 563 46
Full Text Views 45 36 4
PDF Downloads 51 40 4