Easy Task and Choice: Motivational Interventions Facilitate Motor Skill Learning in Children

in Journal of Motor Learning and Development

Click name to view affiliation

Seyyed Mohammadreza MousaviCollege of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Search for other papers by Seyyed Mohammadreza Mousavi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
*
and
Takehiro IwatsukiDepartment of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona College, Altoona, PA, USA

Search for other papers by Takehiro Iwatsuki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2021-0023
Keywords:
enhanced expectancies; autonomy support; self-efficacy
First Published Online:
12 Nov 2021
In Print:
Volume 10: Issue 1
Page Range:
61–75
Restricted access

Expectancies for success and autonomy support have been shown to facilitate motor learning and enhance motor performance. The purpose of the study was to examine whether we replicated (a) enhanced expectancies and autonomy support intervention enhanced motor skill learning in children, and (b) identified the underlying psychological mechanism. Sixty children kicked soccer balls with their dominant leg to a squared area target. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the four groups: enhanced expectancies and autonomy support (EE/AS), enhanced expectancies (EE), autonomy support (AS), or control (CON) groups. Participants learning the skill were or were not provided enhanced expectation instructions by making the task success easier and provided an opportunity to choose one of the three colored balls during their practice. Two days later, they performed retention and transfer tests. Results indicated that the EE/AS group had the highest scores, with main effects of autonomy support being significant and enhanced expectancies being marginally significant for the retention test and significant for the transfer test. The EE/AS group had the highest self-efficacy and perceived choice scores. Therefore, having high expectancies for success and being autonomous were important ingredients for facilitating motor skill learning in children.

Iwatsuki (tui36@psu.edu) is corresponding author, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4227-0151

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Journal of Motor Learning and Development

Cover Journal of Motor Learning and Development

  • Abdollahipour, R., Nieto, M.P., Psotta, R., & Wulf, G. (2017). External focus of attention and autonomy support have additive benefits for motor performance in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 32, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.05.004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Aiken, C.A., Post, P.G., Hout, M.C., & Fairbrother, J.T. (2020). Self-controlled amount and pacing of practice facilitate learning of a sequential timing task. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(4), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1704498

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • An, J., Lewthwaite, R., Lee, S., & Wulf, G. (2020). Choice of practice-task order enhances golf skill learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 50, Article 101737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101737

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ávila, L.T.G., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 849–853. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cameron C.E., Cottone E.A., Murrah W.M., & Grissmer, D.W. (2016). How are motor skills linked to children’s school performance and academic achievement? Child Development Perspectives, 10(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12168

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Carter, M.J., & Ste-Marie, D.M. (2017). Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1879–1888. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1250-7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chauvel, G., Wulf, G., & Maquestiaux, F. (2015). Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 717–721. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0744-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(5), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2014). Effects of generic versus nongeneric feedback on motor learning in children. PLoS One, 9(2), Article e88989. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088989

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chiviacowsky, S., & Lessa, H.T. (2017). Choices over feedback enhance motor learning in older adults. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0031

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., de Medeiros, F.L., Kaefer, A., & Tani, G. (2008). Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(3), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599505

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Campos, T. (2012). Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Gait and Posture, 35(4), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clark, S.E., & Ste-Marie, D.M. (2007). The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children’s self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(5), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600947090

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

  • Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Drews, R., Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2013). Children’s motor skill learning is influenced by their conceptions of ability. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 1(2), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.1.2.38

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Eitam, B., Kennedy, P.M., & Higgins, E.T. (2013). Motivation from control. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3370-7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feltz, D. L., Chow, G. M., & Hepler, T. J. (2008). Path analysis of self-efficacy and diving performance revisited. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.3.401

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gonçalves, G.S., Cardozo, P.L., Valentini, N.C., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2018). Enhancing performance expectancies through positive comparative feedback facilitates the learning of basketball free throw in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 36, 174–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.03.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Halperin, I., Chapman, D.W., Martin, D.T., Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2016). Choices enhance punching performance of competitive kickboxers. Psychological Research, 81(5), 1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0790-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hartman, J.M. (2007). Self-controlled use of a perceived physical assistance device during a balancing task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(3), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.104.3.1005-1016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hooyman, A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2014). Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement Science, 36, 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.04.005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hutchinson, J.C., Sherman, T., Martinovic, N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2008). The effect of manipulated self-efficacy on perceived and sustained effort. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200802351151

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iwatsuki, T., Abdollahipour, Z., Rudolf, P., Lewthwaite, L., & Wulf, G. (2017). Autonomy facilitates repeated maximum force productions. Human Movement Science, 55, 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.08.016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iwatsuki, T., Navalta, J.W., & Wulf, G. (2019). Autonomy enhances running efficiency. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(6), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1522939

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iwatsuki, T., & Regis, C.J. (2021). Relatively easy criteria for success enhances motor learning by altering perceived competence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(2), 900–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520981237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iwatsuki, T., Shih, H., Abdollahipour, Z., & Wulf, G. (2021). More bang for the buck: Autonomy support increases muscular efficiency. Psychological Research, 37, 685–691.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Janelle, C.M., Barba, D.A., Frehlich, S.G., Tennant, L.K., & Cauraugh, J.H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(4), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1997.10608008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kok, M., Komen, A., van Capelleveen, L., & van der Kamp, J. (2020). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a physical education setting: An exploratory study on the shot-put. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lemos, A., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2017). Autonomy support enhances performance expectancies, positive affect, and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 31, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.03.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lewthwaite, R., Chiviacowsky, S., Drews, R., & Wulf, G. (2015). Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1383–1388. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0814-7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903111839

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V.V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McKay, B., & Ste-Marie, D.M. (2020). Autonomy support via instructionally irrelevant choice not beneficial for motor performance or learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1795056

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moritz, S.E., Feltz, D.L., Fahrbach, K.R., & Mack, D.E. (2000). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2000.10608908

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ong, N.T., Lohse, K.R., & Hodges, N.J. (2015). Manipulating target size influences perceptions of success when learning a dart-throwing skill but does not impact retention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Palmer, K., Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2016). Enhanced expectancies facilitate golf putting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Patall, E., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J.C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Post, P.G., Fairbrother, J.T., & Barros, J.A.C. (2011). Self-controlled amount of practice benefits learning of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599780

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ryan, R.M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Saemi, E., Porter, J.M., Ghotbi-Varzaneh, A., Zarghami, M., & Maleki, F. (2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(4), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sanli, E.A., Patterson, J.T., Bray, S.R., & Lee, T.D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 611. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schmidt, R.A., Lee, T.D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H.N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Human kinetics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schultz, W. (1998). Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schultz, W. (2000). Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/35044563

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schultz, W. (2013). Updating dopamine reward signals. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stoate, I., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(8), 815–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.671533

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Trempe, M., Sabourin, M., & Proteau, L. (2012). Success modulates consolidation of a visuomotor adaptation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 52–60.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wehlmann, J.A., & Wulf, G. (2020). Bullseye: Effects of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies on dart throwing. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 16(2), 317–323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wulf, G., & Adams, N. (2014). Small choices can enhance balance learning. Human Movement Science, 38, 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.10.007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P.L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science, 37, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2015). External focus and autonomy support: Two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits. Human Movement Science, 40, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wulf, G., Iwatsuki, T., Machin, B., Kellogg, J., Copeland, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2018). Lassoing skill through learner choice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1341378

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2009). Conceptions of ability affect motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(5), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.3200/35-08-083

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., Cardozo, P.L., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2018). Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3036 2747 119
Full Text Views 32 21 0
PDF Downloads 39 28 1