Motor Skill Retention Is Modulated by Strategy Choice During Self-Controlled Knowledge of Results Schedules

in Journal of Motor Learning and Development
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Ottawa
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $42.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $56.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $80.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $107.00

Investigations into the strategies that are used by participants when they control their knowledge of results (KR) schedule during practice have predominantly relied on multiple-choice questionnaires. More recently, open-ended questions have been used to allow participants to produce their own descriptions rather than selecting a strategy from a predetermined list. This approach has in fact generated new information about the cognitive strategies used by learners to request KR during practice (e.g., Laughlin et al., 2015). Consequently, we examined strategy use in self-controlled KR learning situations using open-ended questions at two different time points during practice. An inductive thematic content analysis revealed five themes that represented participants’ unique strategies for requesting KR. This analysis identified two dominant KR strategies: “establish a baseline understanding” in the first half of practice and “confirm a perceived good trial” in the second half of practice. Both strategies were associated with superior retention compared with a yoked group, a group that was unable to engage in KR request strategies because KR was imposed rather than chosen. Our results indicate that the learning advantages of self-controlled KR schedules over yoked schedules may not only depend on what strategy is used, but also when it is used.

Michael Carter, Scott Rathwell, and Diane Ste-Marie are with the School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Michael Carter is now with the Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Address author correspondence to Michael Carter at carterjmike@gmail.com.
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 157 122 8
Full Text Views 15 2 0
PDF Downloads 16 3 0